Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Transformation of the Institution of Constitutional Control in the Republic of Belarus

View through CrossRef
The article examines the stages of the evolution of constitutional control in the Republic of Belarus, through the prism of the development of abstract and concrete control. Characterizing the form of abstract control, attention is drawn to a certain adjustment of abstract subsequent control, introduced with the adoption of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus in 1994, at different stages of constitutional development (1996, 2014, 2022) in relation to subjects of circulation, objects of control. The form of mandatory preliminary control over the constitutionality of laws adopted by Parliament before their signing by the President, introduced in 2008, is analyzed. As a result of the constitutional changes of 2022, the Belarusian model of preliminary constitutional control has undergone a certain transformation associated with its constitutional legitimation, the expansion of objects of preliminary control, as well as the transition from mandatory to optional control over the constitutionality of laws adopted by Parliament before they are signed by the President. Particular attention is paid to the study of the development of specific constitutional control, taking into account a certain adjustment of the constitutional formula in 2022 with the aim of consistent development of the Belarusian model of constitutional justice within the framework of the European model. Attention is focused on the most important constitutional innovation of 2022 – the introduction of a constitutional complaint, which significantly expands citizens’ access to constitutional justice. It is concluded that each stage of the development of constitutional control in Belarus serves as an example of adaptation to the changing conditions of the functioning of constitutional justice. It has been established that the adjustment in 2022 of the Belarusian model of subsequent concrete constitutional control indicates a transformation of the Belarusian model of constitutional control, consisting of the abandonment of elements of a mixed model, and the current stage of the evolution of constitutional control in the Republic of Belarus demonstrates the transition from an abstract form of constitutional control to concrete constitutional control , which means an increasing role of the Constitutional Court not only as a guarantor of the supremacy of the Constitution, but also as a defender of individual rights and freedoms.
Title: Transformation of the Institution of Constitutional Control in the Republic of Belarus
Description:
The article examines the stages of the evolution of constitutional control in the Republic of Belarus, through the prism of the development of abstract and concrete control.
Characterizing the form of abstract control, attention is drawn to a certain adjustment of abstract subsequent control, introduced with the adoption of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus in 1994, at different stages of constitutional development (1996, 2014, 2022) in relation to subjects of circulation, objects of control.
The form of mandatory preliminary control over the constitutionality of laws adopted by Parliament before their signing by the President, introduced in 2008, is analyzed.
As a result of the constitutional changes of 2022, the Belarusian model of preliminary constitutional control has undergone a certain transformation associated with its constitutional legitimation, the expansion of objects of preliminary control, as well as the transition from mandatory to optional control over the constitutionality of laws adopted by Parliament before they are signed by the President.
Particular attention is paid to the study of the development of specific constitutional control, taking into account a certain adjustment of the constitutional formula in 2022 with the aim of consistent development of the Belarusian model of constitutional justice within the framework of the European model.
Attention is focused on the most important constitutional innovation of 2022 – the introduction of a constitutional complaint, which significantly expands citizens’ access to constitutional justice.
It is concluded that each stage of the development of constitutional control in Belarus serves as an example of adaptation to the changing conditions of the functioning of constitutional justice.
It has been established that the adjustment in 2022 of the Belarusian model of subsequent concrete constitutional control indicates a transformation of the Belarusian model of constitutional control, consisting of the abandonment of elements of a mixed model, and the current stage of the evolution of constitutional control in the Republic of Belarus demonstrates the transition from an abstract form of constitutional control to concrete constitutional control , which means an increasing role of the Constitutional Court not only as a guarantor of the supremacy of the Constitution, but also as a defender of individual rights and freedoms.

Related Results

African Annals of Medicine reviewers in 2024
African Annals of Medicine reviewers in 2024
Le comité éditorial des Annales Africaines de Médecine tient à remercier les lecteurs qui ont analysé les manuscrits soumis pour publication au cours de l’année 2024 et ont ainsi d...
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
Since the World War, international cooperation has been made to preserve the peace and interests of the human community, and representative results include the creation of internat...
Amar Putusan Pada Kewenangan Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi
Amar Putusan Pada Kewenangan Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi
The Constitutional Court as an Indonesian state institution in the judicial review of the law against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia has been regulated by Law N...
Crisis of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and its Constitutional Implication
Crisis of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and its Constitutional Implication
This article analyzes the causes and the progress of the crisis in the Polish constitutional court/tribunal since 2015 and reflects on the constitutional implications of the Polish...
Possible Directions for Migration Policy in Belarus
Possible Directions for Migration Policy in Belarus
The article presents the main directions of the Concept of the state migration policy of the Republic of Belarus. The concept contains the following main directions: directions of ...
Public Utility Services in Poland and Belarus
Public Utility Services in Poland and Belarus
The text deals with the definition of public services and their scope in Belarus and Poland. As a result of the conducted research, it was found that it is difficult to accept one ...
Judge Posner, Judge Wilkinson, and Judicial Critique of Constitutional Theory
Judge Posner, Judge Wilkinson, and Judicial Critique of Constitutional Theory
Judge Richard Posner's well-known view is that constitutional theory is useless. And Judge J Harvie Wilkinson III has lambasted constitutional theory for the way in which its "cosm...

Back to Top