Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abstract P6-14-10: A retrospective study of peri-prosthesis infection after prosthesis based breast reconstruction in a single breast center in east China and impact of an evidence-based protocol

View through CrossRef
Abstract Purpose To investigate the status of surgical site infection after prosthesis-based breast reconstruction in a single center and evaluate the role of an evidence-based protocol in infection control in immediate prosthesis-based breast reconstruction. Method Two cohorts are included in our study. In the first cohort, a retrospective analysis of consecutive post-mastectomy prosthesis-based reconstructions performed between June of 2010 and April of 2018 at Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine was performed. We reviewed clinicopathological information and the surgical outcomes through the medical record and questionnaire. Then we developed an evidence-based perioperative infection prevention protocol marked by preoperative decolonization and sterility optimization according literatures. In the second cohort, patients had undergone prosthesis-based breast reconstruction after protocol implementation between July of 2018 and April of 2019. We compared the surgical outcomes between this two cohort. In this study a patient was considered to have infection if she had any of these: (1) local inflammatory symptoms in breast that requires intravenous antibiotics or surgical intervention, (2) purulent drainage, (3) pathogenic culture positive. Infections requiring surgical intervention were defined as severe infections. T test was used to analyze quantitative data, Fisher’s two-tailed exact test was used to compare qualitative data. A multi-factor logistic regression analysis was used to analyze risk factors. Results In the first cohort,108 reconstruction procedures were performed among 93 patients. Median follow-up time was 17.5 months. The infection rate was 23.1%(25/108). Three prosthesis were explanted at postoperative 30 days, 50 days and 15 months respectively. The prosthesis salvage rate and total explantation rate were 88%(22/25), 2.8%(3/108) respectively. Culture was performed in only 17 patients with 24 samples. Pathogens were found in 4 samples: S.aureus(n=2), enterococci(n=1) and serratia marcescens(n=1). The average duration of prophylactic antibiotics was 5.4±3.9 days. Cephalosporin was the main prophylactic antibiotics. Therapeutic antibiotics for infected patients were mainly based on empirical agents, with vancomycin widely used. A multi-factor regression analysis indicated that large volume prothesis (V>400CC) was an independent risk factor of severe infection (p<0.05). After the protocol was implemented, 48 breasts were reconstructed among 45 patients. Median follow-up time was 6.5 months. Only one patient was considered as infection for tissue expander exposure following nipple necrosis. Overall, the rate of infection reduced significantly from 23.1% (25/108) to 2.1%(1/48) (P = 0.001). Conclusions Our single center data indicated that incidence of peri-prosthesis infection seems high in medium-sized hospitals in eastern China, but explantation rate is still very low. The evidence-based protocol was associated with a significant decline in infection rates among prosthesis-based breast reconstruction patients. In addition, there are many urgent problems such as inadequate application of prophylactic antibiotics, poor awareness of bacterial culture. We will continue to use this protocol in our practice to control infection. Table 1. Schematic of evidence-based protocolPreoperativeIntraoperativePostoperative*nasal swab culture*intravenous cefazolin(swab negative)or vancomycin(swab MRSA)* prophylactic antibiotics for 24 hours* chlorhexidine* chlorhexidine prep*drain removal in 3 weeks after surgery*intranasal mupirocin*glove change*re-draping*prosthesis minimal touch*betadine and antibiotics (cefazolin, gentamicin) irrigation* betadine and antibiotics rinse pocket*dermabond dressing for incision and drains Citation Format: Liu Jian, Guo Jufeng, Hu Shufang, Nie Shijiao, Chen Qiong, Wang Shuying. A retrospective study of peri-prosthesis infection after prosthesis based breast reconstruction in a single breast center in east China and impact of an evidence-based protocol [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-14-10.
Title: Abstract P6-14-10: A retrospective study of peri-prosthesis infection after prosthesis based breast reconstruction in a single breast center in east China and impact of an evidence-based protocol
Description:
Abstract Purpose To investigate the status of surgical site infection after prosthesis-based breast reconstruction in a single center and evaluate the role of an evidence-based protocol in infection control in immediate prosthesis-based breast reconstruction.
Method Two cohorts are included in our study.
In the first cohort, a retrospective analysis of consecutive post-mastectomy prosthesis-based reconstructions performed between June of 2010 and April of 2018 at Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine was performed.
We reviewed clinicopathological information and the surgical outcomes through the medical record and questionnaire.
Then we developed an evidence-based perioperative infection prevention protocol marked by preoperative decolonization and sterility optimization according literatures.
In the second cohort, patients had undergone prosthesis-based breast reconstruction after protocol implementation between July of 2018 and April of 2019.
We compared the surgical outcomes between this two cohort.
In this study a patient was considered to have infection if she had any of these: (1) local inflammatory symptoms in breast that requires intravenous antibiotics or surgical intervention, (2) purulent drainage, (3) pathogenic culture positive.
Infections requiring surgical intervention were defined as severe infections.
T test was used to analyze quantitative data, Fisher’s two-tailed exact test was used to compare qualitative data.
A multi-factor logistic regression analysis was used to analyze risk factors.
Results In the first cohort,108 reconstruction procedures were performed among 93 patients.
Median follow-up time was 17.
5 months.
The infection rate was 23.
1%(25/108).
Three prosthesis were explanted at postoperative 30 days, 50 days and 15 months respectively.
The prosthesis salvage rate and total explantation rate were 88%(22/25), 2.
8%(3/108) respectively.
Culture was performed in only 17 patients with 24 samples.
Pathogens were found in 4 samples: S.
aureus(n=2), enterococci(n=1) and serratia marcescens(n=1).
The average duration of prophylactic antibiotics was 5.
4±3.
9 days.
Cephalosporin was the main prophylactic antibiotics.
Therapeutic antibiotics for infected patients were mainly based on empirical agents, with vancomycin widely used.
A multi-factor regression analysis indicated that large volume prothesis (V>400CC) was an independent risk factor of severe infection (p<0.
05).
After the protocol was implemented, 48 breasts were reconstructed among 45 patients.
Median follow-up time was 6.
5 months.
Only one patient was considered as infection for tissue expander exposure following nipple necrosis.
Overall, the rate of infection reduced significantly from 23.
1% (25/108) to 2.
1%(1/48) (P = 0.
001).
Conclusions Our single center data indicated that incidence of peri-prosthesis infection seems high in medium-sized hospitals in eastern China, but explantation rate is still very low.
The evidence-based protocol was associated with a significant decline in infection rates among prosthesis-based breast reconstruction patients.
In addition, there are many urgent problems such as inadequate application of prophylactic antibiotics, poor awareness of bacterial culture.
We will continue to use this protocol in our practice to control infection.
Table 1.
Schematic of evidence-based protocolPreoperativeIntraoperativePostoperative*nasal swab culture*intravenous cefazolin(swab negative)or vancomycin(swab MRSA)* prophylactic antibiotics for 24 hours* chlorhexidine* chlorhexidine prep*drain removal in 3 weeks after surgery*intranasal mupirocin*glove change*re-draping*prosthesis minimal touch*betadine and antibiotics (cefazolin, gentamicin) irrigation* betadine and antibiotics rinse pocket*dermabond dressing for incision and drains Citation Format: Liu Jian, Guo Jufeng, Hu Shufang, Nie Shijiao, Chen Qiong, Wang Shuying.
A retrospective study of peri-prosthesis infection after prosthesis based breast reconstruction in a single breast center in east China and impact of an evidence-based protocol [abstract].
In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-14-10.

Related Results

Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Abstract IntroductionDesmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), also called aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare, benign, locally aggressive condition. Mammary DTF originates from fibroblasts ...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Subgingival microbiome in patients with healthy and ailing dental implants
Subgingival microbiome in patients with healthy and ailing dental implants
AbstractDental implants are commonly used to replace missing teeth. However, the dysbiotic polymicrobial communities of peri-implant sites are responsible for peri-implant diseases...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Patient informational needs about breast reconstruction post-mastectomy.
Patient informational needs about breast reconstruction post-mastectomy.
88 Background: For many women, receiving a breast cancer diagnosis is further complicated by decisions they will face about breast reconstruction post-mastectomy. While women are ...
GUÍA DE PRÁCTICA CLÍNICA PARA LA PREVENCIÓN Y EL TRATAMIENTO DE ENFERMEDADES PERIIMPLANTARES
GUÍA DE PRÁCTICA CLÍNICA PARA LA PREVENCIÓN Y EL TRATAMIENTO DE ENFERMEDADES PERIIMPLANTARES
Introduction: the incidence of peri-implant diseases is high, and their optimal management is still debated. The purpose was to explore the levels of available evidence and to sugg...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

Back to Top