Regional diversity in drug-induced lung diseases among the USA, European Union, and Japan

BackgroundDrug-induced lung disease (DILD) is a considerable and potentially fatal adverse event with poorly understood risk factors. Large-scale, data-driven analyses investigating regional discrepancies in DILD incidence are lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential association among DILD prevalence, regional differences and other factors based on large-scale data base.MethodsThis retrospective observational study analyzed spontaneous adverse event reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database between January 2010 and December 2020. Regional disparities in DILD incidence were assessed among reports from the United States of America (USA), the European Union (EU), and Japan (JP). Using multivariate logistic regression accounting for age, sex, and reporting years, we calculated the reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses were performed for different types of anticancer agents, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), and cytotoxic agents.ResultsRegional differences in RORs were observed for anticancer drugs in reports from JP and the EU compared with those from the USA (JP, ROR 4.432; EU, ROR 1.291) and for non-anticancer drugs (JP, ROR 3.481; EU, ROR 1.086). Significantly higher RORs were observed for all anticancer drug regimens reported in JP than in the USA (TKIs, ROR 3.274; ICIs, ROR 2.170; ADCs, ROR 2.335; cytotoxic agents, ROR 3.989). The EU reports exhibited higher RORs for TKIs and cytotoxic agents than the USA reports, with no significant differences in ICIs or ADCs (TKIs, ROR 1.679; ICIs, ROR 1.041; ADCs, ROR 1.046; cytotoxic agents, ROR 1.418).ConclusionThe prevalence of DILD in JP, the EU, and the USA differed. These findings have important implications in evaluating the safety profiles of drugs and patient safety in drug development and clinical practice. This study is the first to identify regional differences in DILDs using a large global database.