Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Deontological versus Teleological Views of Deception in Medical Research

View through CrossRef
The need for valid research remains urgent and a priority for all authentic studies. One of the research procedures (allowed in special circumstances) is the deception of research participants for some reasons in order to use them in the study. Questions emerge on whether deceiving participants is acceptable, and how deception actually compromises the respect for persons. Arguments for or against deception in research usually anchor on either deontological or teleological reasons. This however creates tension. This study has suggested determination on whether deception in research is right or wrong, based on how those studies balance concern for science versus research participants’ welfare. The most authentic study, as proposed in this paper, is a research approach which only accepts to use deception in research, when both the concern for science and concern for participants remains simultaneously high; and not deception at the expense of the research participants.
Title: Deontological versus Teleological Views of Deception in Medical Research
Description:
The need for valid research remains urgent and a priority for all authentic studies.
One of the research procedures (allowed in special circumstances) is the deception of research participants for some reasons in order to use them in the study.
Questions emerge on whether deceiving participants is acceptable, and how deception actually compromises the respect for persons.
Arguments for or against deception in research usually anchor on either deontological or teleological reasons.
This however creates tension.
This study has suggested determination on whether deception in research is right or wrong, based on how those studies balance concern for science versus research participants’ welfare.
The most authentic study, as proposed in this paper, is a research approach which only accepts to use deception in research, when both the concern for science and concern for participants remains simultaneously high; and not deception at the expense of the research participants.

Related Results

Deception-Based Security Framework for IoT: An Empirical Study
Deception-Based Security Framework for IoT: An Empirical Study
<p><b>A large number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices in use has provided a vast attack surface. The security in IoT devices is a significant challenge considering c...
The Role of Computer Deception in Network Security
The Role of Computer Deception in Network Security
With the rapid development of Internet technology, computer has become an indispensable part of modern society. However, with the popularization of computer technology, the problem...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Self-deception
Self-deception
In this paper I defend non-intentional conception of self-deception. First, I?ll make clear distinction between deceiving, lying, and deluding. Then, taking Cartesian metodol...
Teleological thinking is driven by aberrant associations
Teleological thinking is driven by aberrant associations
Teleological thought — the tendency to ascribe purpose to objects and events — is useful in some cases (encouraging explanation-seeking), but harmful in others (fueling delusions a...
Please, Please, Just Tell Me: The Linguistic Features of Humorous Deception
Please, Please, Just Tell Me: The Linguistic Features of Humorous Deception
Prior research undertaken for the purpose of identifying deceptive language has focused on deception as it is used for nefarious ends, such as purposeful lying. However, despite th...
A normative account of self-deception, overconfidence, and paranoia
A normative account of self-deception, overconfidence, and paranoia
Self-deception, paranoia, and overconfidence involve misbeliefs about self, others, and world. They are often considered mistaken. Here we explore whether they might be adaptive, a...
13 Self‐Deception and Three Psychiatric Delusions
13 Self‐Deception and Three Psychiatric Delusions
Abstract Audi has suggested that the difference between self‐deception and delusion with respect to a false proposition turns on whether the subject believes the fal...

Back to Top