Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

High-dose external BEAM intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HD-IMRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus HDR brachytherapy boost (LD-IMRT+HDR-B) dose escalation for intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer

View through CrossRef
263 Background: To report early & late toxicity & biochemical outcome in a prospective series of 1,465 patients with intermediate- or high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer treated with either HD-IMRT or with LD-IMRT+HDR-B. Methods: Between 12/1999 and 10/2011, 1,465 patients (pts) with PSA›10, Gleason score›6 and/or T2b-T3 N0 M0 prostate cancer entered the study. Pts were prospectively assigned to one of the two treatment groups: 76 Gy HD-IMRT to the prostate in 38 fractions (group 1; 733 patients) or 46 Gy LD-IMRT followed by 16 Gy HDR-B given in 2 fractions of 8 Gy (group 2, 732 patients), limiting the maximum rectal dose to 85% of the prescribed dose. Both groups were well balanced taking into account patient’s as well as tumor’s characteristics. Toxicities were scored by the EORTC/RTOG morbidity grading scales. Special attention to local, regional or distant recurrence, survival, late effects, PSA and testosterone levels and quality of life was done. Results: All pts completed treatment. None pts included in the group 1 or 2 experienced grade 3 or more rectal toxicity. 94 pts of group 1 (12.8%) and 20 pts of group 2 (2.7%) developed grade 2 rectal toxicity (rectal bleeding or urgency). 49 pts in group 1 (6.7%) and 10 pts in group 2 (1.3%) developed grade 1 rectal bleeding (less than 2 times/week). With a mean follow-up of 112 months, the 10-year free-from-failure survival was 90.7% and 98.3% (p<0.001) in group 1 and 2 respectively; free-from-metastases survival 93.9% and 97.8% (p<0,002)for group 1 and 2 respectively; and cause-specific survival 90.1% and 98.2% (p<0.001). No complications grade 2-4 were seen in either group. Conclusions: IMRT + HDR brachytherapy boost was a safe and extremely effective method of escalating the dose to the prostate without increasing the risk of late effects. Acute as well as late rectal complications were significantly reduced. Control rates were significantly better in the HDR-boosted patients as expected by higher effective-dose. Brachytherapy boost treated patients had a significant longer survival.
Title: High-dose external BEAM intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HD-IMRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus HDR brachytherapy boost (LD-IMRT+HDR-B) dose escalation for intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer
Description:
263 Background: To report early & late toxicity & biochemical outcome in a prospective series of 1,465 patients with intermediate- or high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer treated with either HD-IMRT or with LD-IMRT+HDR-B.
Methods: Between 12/1999 and 10/2011, 1,465 patients (pts) with PSA›10, Gleason score›6 and/or T2b-T3 N0 M0 prostate cancer entered the study.
Pts were prospectively assigned to one of the two treatment groups: 76 Gy HD-IMRT to the prostate in 38 fractions (group 1; 733 patients) or 46 Gy LD-IMRT followed by 16 Gy HDR-B given in 2 fractions of 8 Gy (group 2, 732 patients), limiting the maximum rectal dose to 85% of the prescribed dose.
Both groups were well balanced taking into account patient’s as well as tumor’s characteristics.
Toxicities were scored by the EORTC/RTOG morbidity grading scales.
Special attention to local, regional or distant recurrence, survival, late effects, PSA and testosterone levels and quality of life was done.
Results: All pts completed treatment.
None pts included in the group 1 or 2 experienced grade 3 or more rectal toxicity.
94 pts of group 1 (12.
8%) and 20 pts of group 2 (2.
7%) developed grade 2 rectal toxicity (rectal bleeding or urgency).
49 pts in group 1 (6.
7%) and 10 pts in group 2 (1.
3%) developed grade 1 rectal bleeding (less than 2 times/week).
With a mean follow-up of 112 months, the 10-year free-from-failure survival was 90.
7% and 98.
3% (p<0.
001) in group 1 and 2 respectively; free-from-metastases survival 93.
9% and 97.
8% (p<0,002)for group 1 and 2 respectively; and cause-specific survival 90.
1% and 98.
2% (p<0.
001).
No complications grade 2-4 were seen in either group.
Conclusions: IMRT + HDR brachytherapy boost was a safe and extremely effective method of escalating the dose to the prostate without increasing the risk of late effects.
Acute as well as late rectal complications were significantly reduced.
Control rates were significantly better in the HDR-boosted patients as expected by higher effective-dose.
Brachytherapy boost treated patients had a significant longer survival.

Related Results

Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer Outcome by Biopsy Grade and Risk Group
Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer Outcome by Biopsy Grade and Risk Group
ImportanceAdvocates for removing the cancer label from grade group 1 (GG1) prostate cancer detected on biopsy primarily base their argument on the observation that when only GG1 is...
Nasopharyngeal intracavitary brachytherapy
Nasopharyngeal intracavitary brachytherapy
AbstractBACKGROUNDLocally persistent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) carries an increased risk of local failure if additional treatment is not given. It has been shown that intracav...
Abstract 4602: Clinicopathological and genetic features of prostate cancer in Algerian patients: First report
Abstract 4602: Clinicopathological and genetic features of prostate cancer in Algerian patients: First report
Abstract Background: Prostate cancer is the second most frequent malignancy (after lung cancer) in men worldwide. It is the third most common cancer in men in Algeri...
Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT in radical chemoradiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT in radical chemoradiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
ABSTRACT Background: Radical chemoradiation is the standard of treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus and for patien...

Back to Top