Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study
View through CrossRef
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women with interpregnancy interval of < and ⩾6 months (short and normal interpregnancy interval, respectively) following a spontaneous miscarriage in their last pregnancies. Methods: This was a cohort study that involved pregnant women with a spontaneous pregnancy loss in their last pregnancies. They were recruited at a gestational age of 13–15 weeks and followed up to determine the obstetric and foetal outcomes of their pregnancies at four tertiary hospitals in Nigeria from July 2018 to September 2019. Data collected were analysed using SPSS version 26.0. A Chi-square and multivariate logistic regression analysis were done, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was assumed to be statistically significant. Results: A total of 705 participants were studied, out of which 448 (63.5%) and 257 (36.5%) of the participants had short and normal interpregnancy interval after a spontaneous miscarriage. Over 80% of the participants had first-trimester pregnancy losses and were managed with manual vacuum aspiration in 73.3% of the cases. The majority, 87.5% for the normal interpregnancy interval cohort and 86.4% for the short interpregnancy interval cohort, had live births, while 8.5% and 10.1% of the women in the normal and short interpregnancy interval cohorts, respectively, had repeat miscarriages. There was no statistical difference in the occurrence of live births and repeat miscarriages between both cohorts (p > 0.05). There was no increased risk of occurrence of adverse foetomaternal outcomes in both groups (p > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in the occurrence adverse foetomaternal outcomes between the studied cohorts (p > 0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes in the cohorts of mothers with short and normal interpregnancy interval following miscarriages in their last previous pregnancies.
Title: Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study
Description:
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women with interpregnancy interval of < and ⩾6 months (short and normal interpregnancy interval, respectively) following a spontaneous miscarriage in their last pregnancies.
Methods: This was a cohort study that involved pregnant women with a spontaneous pregnancy loss in their last pregnancies.
They were recruited at a gestational age of 13–15 weeks and followed up to determine the obstetric and foetal outcomes of their pregnancies at four tertiary hospitals in Nigeria from July 2018 to September 2019.
Data collected were analysed using SPSS version 26.
A Chi-square and multivariate logistic regression analysis were done, and a p-value of less than 0.
05 was assumed to be statistically significant.
Results: A total of 705 participants were studied, out of which 448 (63.
5%) and 257 (36.
5%) of the participants had short and normal interpregnancy interval after a spontaneous miscarriage.
Over 80% of the participants had first-trimester pregnancy losses and were managed with manual vacuum aspiration in 73.
3% of the cases.
The majority, 87.
5% for the normal interpregnancy interval cohort and 86.
4% for the short interpregnancy interval cohort, had live births, while 8.
5% and 10.
1% of the women in the normal and short interpregnancy interval cohorts, respectively, had repeat miscarriages.
There was no statistical difference in the occurrence of live births and repeat miscarriages between both cohorts (p > 0.
05).
There was no increased risk of occurrence of adverse foetomaternal outcomes in both groups (p > 0.
05).
Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in the occurrence adverse foetomaternal outcomes between the studied cohorts (p > 0.
05).
Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes in the cohorts of mothers with short and normal interpregnancy interval following miscarriages in their last previous pregnancies.
Related Results
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
IntroductionLike other forms of embodiment, pregnancy has increasingly become subject to representation and interpretation via digital technologies. Pregnancy and the unborn entity...
Tracing Hematological Shifts in Pregnancy: How Anemia and Thrombocytopenia Evolve Across Trimesters
Tracing Hematological Shifts in Pregnancy: How Anemia and Thrombocytopenia Evolve Across Trimesters
Abstract
Introduction
Given pregnancy's significant impact on hematological parameters, monitoring these changes across trimesters is crucial. This study aims to evaluate hematolog...
Nutrition in pregnancy
Nutrition in pregnancy
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
PHYSIOLOGICAL CHANGES DURING PREGNANCY
Changes in body composition and weight gain
Changes in blood composition
Metabolic changes and adaptive responses
K...
Knowledge about unintended pregnancy shortly after childbirth: An issue of ineffective counseling or adherence?
Knowledge about unintended pregnancy shortly after childbirth: An issue of ineffective counseling or adherence?
Background: Being aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period is often overlooked but remains a significant...
Interpregnancy interval and birth defects
Interpregnancy interval and birth defects
BackgroundInterpregnancy interval is a risk factor for various adverse birth outcomes including birth defects. We investigated the relationship between interpregnancy interval and ...
P-383 Development and validation of a visualized prediction model for early miscarriage risk in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI procedures: a real-world multi-center study
P-383 Development and validation of a visualized prediction model for early miscarriage risk in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI procedures: a real-world multi-center study
Abstract
Study question
What are the key predictors of early miscarriage in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment?
...
The relationship between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and mother’s preceding pregnancies (PP)
The relationship between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and mother’s preceding pregnancies (PP)
Abstract
Introduction
Following the investigation of the mother’s preceding pregnancies on fetal development and postnatal surv...
Communal Load Sharing of Miscarriage Experiences: Thematic Analysis of Social Media Community Support (Preprint)
Communal Load Sharing of Miscarriage Experiences: Thematic Analysis of Social Media Community Support (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Miscarriage is a common experience, affecting 15% of recognized pregnancies, but societal ignorance and taboos often downplay the mental distress...

