Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study
View through CrossRef
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women with interpregnancy interval of < and ⩾6 months (short and normal interpregnancy interval, respectively) following a spontaneous miscarriage in their last pregnancies. Methods: This was a cohort study that involved pregnant women with a spontaneous pregnancy loss in their last pregnancies. They were recruited at a gestational age of 13–15 weeks and followed up to determine the obstetric and foetal outcomes of their pregnancies at four tertiary hospitals in Nigeria from July 2018 to September 2019. Data collected were analysed using SPSS version 26.0. A Chi-square and multivariate logistic regression analysis were done, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was assumed to be statistically significant. Results: A total of 705 participants were studied, out of which 448 (63.5%) and 257 (36.5%) of the participants had short and normal interpregnancy interval after a spontaneous miscarriage. Over 80% of the participants had first-trimester pregnancy losses and were managed with manual vacuum aspiration in 73.3% of the cases. The majority, 87.5% for the normal interpregnancy interval cohort and 86.4% for the short interpregnancy interval cohort, had live births, while 8.5% and 10.1% of the women in the normal and short interpregnancy interval cohorts, respectively, had repeat miscarriages. There was no statistical difference in the occurrence of live births and repeat miscarriages between both cohorts (p > 0.05). There was no increased risk of occurrence of adverse foetomaternal outcomes in both groups (p > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in the occurrence adverse foetomaternal outcomes between the studied cohorts (p > 0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes in the cohorts of mothers with short and normal interpregnancy interval following miscarriages in their last previous pregnancies.
Title: Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study
Description:
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women with interpregnancy interval of < and ⩾6 months (short and normal interpregnancy interval, respectively) following a spontaneous miscarriage in their last pregnancies.
Methods: This was a cohort study that involved pregnant women with a spontaneous pregnancy loss in their last pregnancies.
They were recruited at a gestational age of 13–15 weeks and followed up to determine the obstetric and foetal outcomes of their pregnancies at four tertiary hospitals in Nigeria from July 2018 to September 2019.
Data collected were analysed using SPSS version 26.
A Chi-square and multivariate logistic regression analysis were done, and a p-value of less than 0.
05 was assumed to be statistically significant.
Results: A total of 705 participants were studied, out of which 448 (63.
5%) and 257 (36.
5%) of the participants had short and normal interpregnancy interval after a spontaneous miscarriage.
Over 80% of the participants had first-trimester pregnancy losses and were managed with manual vacuum aspiration in 73.
3% of the cases.
The majority, 87.
5% for the normal interpregnancy interval cohort and 86.
4% for the short interpregnancy interval cohort, had live births, while 8.
5% and 10.
1% of the women in the normal and short interpregnancy interval cohorts, respectively, had repeat miscarriages.
There was no statistical difference in the occurrence of live births and repeat miscarriages between both cohorts (p > 0.
05).
There was no increased risk of occurrence of adverse foetomaternal outcomes in both groups (p > 0.
05).
Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in the occurrence adverse foetomaternal outcomes between the studied cohorts (p > 0.
05).
Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes in the cohorts of mothers with short and normal interpregnancy interval following miscarriages in their last previous pregnancies.
Related Results
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
IntroductionLike other forms of embodiment, pregnancy has increasingly become subject to representation and interpretation via digital technologies. Pregnancy and the unborn entity...
Nutrition in pregnancy
Nutrition in pregnancy
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
PHYSIOLOGICAL CHANGES DURING PREGNANCY
Changes in body composition and weight gain
Changes in blood composition
Metabolic changes and adaptive responses
K...
Interpregnancy interval and birth defects
Interpregnancy interval and birth defects
BackgroundInterpregnancy interval is a risk factor for various adverse birth outcomes including birth defects. We investigated the relationship between interpregnancy interval and ...
P-383 Development and validation of a visualized prediction model for early miscarriage risk in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI procedures: a real-world multi-center study
P-383 Development and validation of a visualized prediction model for early miscarriage risk in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI procedures: a real-world multi-center study
Abstract
Study question
What are the key predictors of early miscarriage in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment?
...
Communal Load Sharing of Miscarriage Experiences: Thematic Analysis of Social Media Community Support (Preprint)
Communal Load Sharing of Miscarriage Experiences: Thematic Analysis of Social Media Community Support (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Miscarriage is a common experience, affecting 15% of recognized pregnancies, but societal ignorance and taboos often downplay the mental distress...
Obstetric admission and maternal mortality in the intensive care unit in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Obstetric admission and maternal mortality in the intensive care unit in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Obstetric complications are a major contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in low-resource settings such as many countries in Africa. Inte...
Non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy and the effects on maternal and fetal outcomes: A systematic review
Non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy and the effects on maternal and fetal outcomes: A systematic review
Background and objective: Non-obstetric surgery is fairly common in pregnant women. We performed a systematic review to update data on non-obstetric surgery in pregnant women. The ...
Epidemiological Characteristics and Risk Factors of Obstetric Infection After the Universal Two-child Policy in North China: A 5-year Retrospective Study Based on 268, 311 Cases
Epidemiological Characteristics and Risk Factors of Obstetric Infection After the Universal Two-child Policy in North China: A 5-year Retrospective Study Based on 268, 311 Cases
Abstract
PurposeObstetrical infection is one of the causes of maternal death and a difficult problem for many clinicians. Changes in the demographic and obstetric backgroun...

