Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Aerosol Research Observation Station (AEROS)
View through CrossRef
Abstract. Information on atmospheric particles' concentration and sizes is important for environmental and human health reasons. Air quality monitoring stations (AQMSs) for measuring particulate matter (PM) concentrations are found across the United States, but only three AQMSs measure PM2.5 concentrations (mass of particles with an aerodynamic diameter of < 2.5 µm) in the Southern High Plains of West Texas (area ≥ 1.8 × 105 km2). This area is prone to many dust events (∼ 21 yr−1), yet no information is available on other PM
sizes, total particle number concentration, or size distribution during
these events. The Aerosol Research Observation Station (AEROS) was designed
to continuously measure these particles' mass concentrations (PM1,
PM2.5, PM4, and PM10) and number concentrations (0.25–35.15 µm) using three optical particle sensors
(Grimm 11-D, OPS, and DustTrak) to better understand the impact of dust events on local air quality. The AEROS aerosol measurement unit features a temperature-controlled shed with a dedicated inlet and custom-built dryer
for each of the three aerosol instruments used. This article provides a
description of AEROS as well as an intercomparison of the different
instruments using laboratory and atmospheric particles. Instruments used in
AEROS measured a similar number concentration with an average difference of 2 ± 3 cm−1 (OPS and Grimm 11-D using similar particle size ranges) and a similar mass concentration, with an average difference of 8 ± 3.6 µg m−3 for different PM sizes between the three instruments.
Grimm 11-D and OPS had a similar number concentration and size distribution, using a similar particle size range and similar PM10 concentrations (mass of particles with an aerodynamic diameter of < 10 µm).
Overall, Grimm 11-D and DustTrak had good agreement in mass concentration, and comparison using laboratory particles was better than that with atmospheric particles. Overall, DustTrak measured lower mass concentrations compared to
Grimm 11-D for larger particle sizes and higher mass concentrations for lower PM sizes. Measurement with AEROS can distinguish between various
pollution events (natural vs. anthropogenic) based on their mass concentration and size distribution, which will help to improve knowledge of
the air quality in this region.
Title: The Aerosol Research Observation Station (AEROS)
Description:
Abstract.
Information on atmospheric particles' concentration and sizes is important for environmental and human health reasons.
Air quality monitoring stations (AQMSs) for measuring particulate matter (PM) concentrations are found across the United States, but only three AQMSs measure PM2.
5 concentrations (mass of particles with an aerodynamic diameter of < 2.
5 µm) in the Southern High Plains of West Texas (area ≥ 1.
8 × 105 km2).
This area is prone to many dust events (∼ 21 yr−1), yet no information is available on other PM
sizes, total particle number concentration, or size distribution during
these events.
The Aerosol Research Observation Station (AEROS) was designed
to continuously measure these particles' mass concentrations (PM1,
PM2.
5, PM4, and PM10) and number concentrations (0.
25–35.
15 µm) using three optical particle sensors
(Grimm 11-D, OPS, and DustTrak) to better understand the impact of dust events on local air quality.
The AEROS aerosol measurement unit features a temperature-controlled shed with a dedicated inlet and custom-built dryer
for each of the three aerosol instruments used.
This article provides a
description of AEROS as well as an intercomparison of the different
instruments using laboratory and atmospheric particles.
Instruments used in
AEROS measured a similar number concentration with an average difference of 2 ± 3 cm−1 (OPS and Grimm 11-D using similar particle size ranges) and a similar mass concentration, with an average difference of 8 ± 3.
6 µg m−3 for different PM sizes between the three instruments.
Grimm 11-D and OPS had a similar number concentration and size distribution, using a similar particle size range and similar PM10 concentrations (mass of particles with an aerodynamic diameter of < 10 µm).
Overall, Grimm 11-D and DustTrak had good agreement in mass concentration, and comparison using laboratory particles was better than that with atmospheric particles.
Overall, DustTrak measured lower mass concentrations compared to
Grimm 11-D for larger particle sizes and higher mass concentrations for lower PM sizes.
Measurement with AEROS can distinguish between various
pollution events (natural vs.
anthropogenic) based on their mass concentration and size distribution, which will help to improve knowledge of
the air quality in this region.
Related Results
The Aerosol Research Observation Station (AEROS)
The Aerosol Research Observation Station (AEROS)
Abstract. Information on atmospheric particles’ concentration and sizes are important for environmental and human health reasons. Air quality monitor stations (AQMSs) for measuring...
Aerosol optical and radiative properties over Asia: Ground-based AERONET observations
Aerosol optical and radiative properties over Asia: Ground-based AERONET observations
Aerosols continue to contribute the largest uncertainty in quantifying Earth’s climate change. The uncertainty associated with aerosol radiative forcing is found to be hi...
A holistic aerosol model for Uranus and Neptune, including Dark Spots
A holistic aerosol model for Uranus and Neptune, including Dark Spots
<p>Previous studies of the reflectance spectra of Uranus and Neptune concentrated on individual, narrow wavelength regions, inferring solutions for the vertical struc...
Assessment of dynamic aerosol-radiation interaction in atmospheric models
Assessment of dynamic aerosol-radiation interaction in atmospheric models
In this thesis an assessment of the parameterization of the Aerosol-Radiation Interaction (ARI) in online integrated meteorology-chemistry models has been conducted. The model esti...
The end of the anthropogenic aerosol era?
The end of the anthropogenic aerosol era?
<p>The Earth&#8217;s climate is rapidly changing. Over the past century, aerosols, via their ability to absorb or scatter solar radiation and alter clouds, pl...
Strong light scattering of highly oxygenated organic aerosols impacts significantly on visibility degradation
Strong light scattering of highly oxygenated organic aerosols impacts significantly on visibility degradation
Abstract. Secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) account for a large fraction of atmospheric
aerosol mass and play significant roles in visibility impairment by
scattering solar radiati...
Strong light scattering of highly oxygenated organic aerosols impacts significantly on visibility degradation
Strong light scattering of highly oxygenated organic aerosols impacts significantly on visibility degradation
Abstract. Secondary organic aerosols (SOA) account for a large fraction of atmospheric aerosol mass and play significant roles in visibility impairment by scattering solar radiatio...
Aerosol impacts for convective parameterizations: Applications of the Grell-Freitas Convective Parameterization
Aerosol impacts for convective parameterizations: Applications of the Grell-Freitas Convective Parameterization
<p>The Grell-Freitas (GF) cumulus parameterization is an aerosol-aware, scale-aware convective parameterization that has been used globally and regionally. This prese...

