Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The contribution of stimulus frequency and attention to the N2 and P3 in Go/Nogo: A multilab replication and new analyses

View through CrossRef
Numerous EEG studies have found that stimuli that require withholding a response (Nogo stimuli) elicit two scalp-recorded event-related potentials (ERPs), the frontal N2 and the frontocentral P3, that are larger than for stimuli that require a response (Go stimuli). The functional significance of these ERPs is not entirely clear, with some accounts focusing on inhibitory processes, and others focusing on a conflict monitoring explanation. Our understanding of the role of these components is further complicated by the presence of potential confounds in traditional Go/Nogo tasks. One important confound present in many studies is the lower frequency of Nogo stimuli relative to Go stimuli. Since the N2 and P3 are generally modulated by stimulus frequency and novelty, the Nogo enhancement could reflect an automatic mismatch process elicited by infrequent Nogo stimuli. A seminal study by Eimer (1993) involved matching the probability of Go/Nogo stimuli to test the contribution of stimulus frequency and manipulating spatial attention to test the explanation that an automatic stimulus mismatch process could be driving these differences. Such an explanation for the frontal N2 predicts that there should be no modulation of frontal N2 Go/Nogo effects by spatial attention. Results showed a larger N2 and P3 for Nogo than Go stimuli, indicating that stimulus frequency is not the determinant factor for these effects. Furthermore, N2 and P3 Go/Nogo effects were modulated by the attentional cue, suggesting that they are not the result of an automatic mismatch process. Subsequent research has also shown larger N2 and P3 amplitudes for Nogo stimuli when Go and Nogo stimuli are equiprobable, but the results have not been entirely consistent because of variability in the paradigms used. The purpose of the present study is to directly replicate the original study by Eimer (1993) and to test the robustness of the results to variations in the analysis pipelines. As part of the #EEGManyLabs project, 5 labs will independently replicate the original study, resulting in a multisite replication with high statistical power. Individual replications will also be integrated via a meta-analysis. Together, these studies will provide important information about the replicability of classic EEG findings and advance our understanding of the role of the frontal N2 and frontocentral P3 during inhibition tasks.
Title: The contribution of stimulus frequency and attention to the N2 and P3 in Go/Nogo: A multilab replication and new analyses
Description:
Numerous EEG studies have found that stimuli that require withholding a response (Nogo stimuli) elicit two scalp-recorded event-related potentials (ERPs), the frontal N2 and the frontocentral P3, that are larger than for stimuli that require a response (Go stimuli).
The functional significance of these ERPs is not entirely clear, with some accounts focusing on inhibitory processes, and others focusing on a conflict monitoring explanation.
Our understanding of the role of these components is further complicated by the presence of potential confounds in traditional Go/Nogo tasks.
One important confound present in many studies is the lower frequency of Nogo stimuli relative to Go stimuli.
Since the N2 and P3 are generally modulated by stimulus frequency and novelty, the Nogo enhancement could reflect an automatic mismatch process elicited by infrequent Nogo stimuli.
A seminal study by Eimer (1993) involved matching the probability of Go/Nogo stimuli to test the contribution of stimulus frequency and manipulating spatial attention to test the explanation that an automatic stimulus mismatch process could be driving these differences.
Such an explanation for the frontal N2 predicts that there should be no modulation of frontal N2 Go/Nogo effects by spatial attention.
Results showed a larger N2 and P3 for Nogo than Go stimuli, indicating that stimulus frequency is not the determinant factor for these effects.
Furthermore, N2 and P3 Go/Nogo effects were modulated by the attentional cue, suggesting that they are not the result of an automatic mismatch process.
Subsequent research has also shown larger N2 and P3 amplitudes for Nogo stimuli when Go and Nogo stimuli are equiprobable, but the results have not been entirely consistent because of variability in the paradigms used.
The purpose of the present study is to directly replicate the original study by Eimer (1993) and to test the robustness of the results to variations in the analysis pipelines.
As part of the #EEGManyLabs project, 5 labs will independently replicate the original study, resulting in a multisite replication with high statistical power.
Individual replications will also be integrated via a meta-analysis.
Together, these studies will provide important information about the replicability of classic EEG findings and advance our understanding of the role of the frontal N2 and frontocentral P3 during inhibition tasks.

Related Results

Evaluating the effectiveness of anti-Nogo treatment in spinal cord injuries
Evaluating the effectiveness of anti-Nogo treatment in spinal cord injuries
AbstractAs humans, we cannot regenerate axons within the central nervous system (CNS), therefore, making any damage to it permanent. This leads to the loss of sensory and motor fun...
Single‐Molecule Optical Replication Mapping (ORM) Suggests Human Replication Timing is Regulated by Stochastic Initiation
Single‐Molecule Optical Replication Mapping (ORM) Suggests Human Replication Timing is Regulated by Stochastic Initiation
DNA replication timing is regulated by the timing of initiation across the genome. However, there is no consensus as to how initiation timing is regulated. Deterministic models con...
Hepatitis C Virus Replication Depends on Endosomal Cholesterol Homeostasis
Hepatitis C Virus Replication Depends on Endosomal Cholesterol Homeostasis
ABSTRACT Similar to other positive-strand RNA viruses, hepatitis C virus (HCV) causes massive rearrangements of intracellular membranes, resulting in a membranous web (MW...
Event-Related Brain Potentials N140 and P300 during Somatosensory Go/NoGo Tasks Are Modulated by Movement Preparation
Event-Related Brain Potentials N140 and P300 during Somatosensory Go/NoGo Tasks Are Modulated by Movement Preparation
The Go/NoGo task requires attention and sensory processing to distinguish a motor action cue or ‘Go stimulus’ from a ‘NoGo stimulus’ requiring no action, as well as motor preparati...
Identification of 1600 replication origins in S. cerevisiae
Identification of 1600 replication origins in S. cerevisiae
Abstract There are approximately 500 known origins of replication in the yeast genome, and the process by which DNA replication initiates at these locations is well understood. In ...
The Interaction of ADHD-Traits and Trait Anxiety on Inhibitory Control
The Interaction of ADHD-Traits and Trait Anxiety on Inhibitory Control
ADHD and anxiety frequently occur together; however, the cognitive outcomes of co-morbid anxiety and ADHD are not straightforward. A potential explanation for conflicting results i...
Covert attention increases the gain of stimulus-evoked population codes
Covert attention increases the gain of stimulus-evoked population codes
AbstractCovert spatial attention has a variety of effects on the responses of individual neurons. However, relatively little is known about the net effect of these changes on senso...
Single-cell replication profiling reveals stochastic regulation of the mammalian replication-timing program
Single-cell replication profiling reveals stochastic regulation of the mammalian replication-timing program
AbstractIn mammalian cells, distinct replication domains (RDs), corresponding to structural units of chromosomes called topologically-associating domains (TADs), replicate at diffe...

Back to Top