Javascript must be enabled to continue!
AnAureusof Pompeius Magnus
View through CrossRef
AbstractIn a recent article in this journal, Kathryn Welch and Hannah Mitchell examined a much debated question: to what extent did Roman commanders, and in particular Pompeius, model themselves on Alexander the Great?1The opposing views on this question are best encapsulated by Peter Green on the one side, and Erich Gruen on the other.2One piece of evidence used in this continuing debate is anaureusof Pompeius, but there are two disputes related to it: the date of its issue and the iconography of its obverse. Unfortunately, due to a lack of specific evidence the discussion trying to resolve these disputes often ends without a clear conclusion, and we are left with speculation and conjecture.The reverse of theaureusshows a triumph, and the nub of the question about dating the coin is which triumph does it depict. The argument here is that the coin depicts Pompeius’ third triumph in 61 BC, when he celebrated his extensive conquests in the East. That date will help the argument that the personification on the obverse has Alexander overtones, as some scholars suggest. If that can be established, it will give some idea of Pompeius’ intentions in minting the coin: Pompeius was not only channelling Alexander, but also trying to imply that he had surpassed the Macedonian king’s achievements.
Title: AnAureusof Pompeius Magnus
Description:
AbstractIn a recent article in this journal, Kathryn Welch and Hannah Mitchell examined a much debated question: to what extent did Roman commanders, and in particular Pompeius, model themselves on Alexander the Great?1The opposing views on this question are best encapsulated by Peter Green on the one side, and Erich Gruen on the other.
2One piece of evidence used in this continuing debate is anaureusof Pompeius, but there are two disputes related to it: the date of its issue and the iconography of its obverse.
Unfortunately, due to a lack of specific evidence the discussion trying to resolve these disputes often ends without a clear conclusion, and we are left with speculation and conjecture.
The reverse of theaureusshows a triumph, and the nub of the question about dating the coin is which triumph does it depict.
The argument here is that the coin depicts Pompeius’ third triumph in 61 BC, when he celebrated his extensive conquests in the East.
That date will help the argument that the personification on the obverse has Alexander overtones, as some scholars suggest.
If that can be established, it will give some idea of Pompeius’ intentions in minting the coin: Pompeius was not only channelling Alexander, but also trying to imply that he had surpassed the Macedonian king’s achievements.
Related Results
Pompeius’ Career from 79 to 70 BCE: Constitutional, Political and Historical Considerations
Pompeius’ Career from 79 to 70 BCE: Constitutional, Political and Historical Considerations
Abstract
Cn. Pompeius Magnus is undoubtedly best known for his great commands of 67 and 66 BCE and his subsequent role as ally, then enemy, of Iulius Caesar. Nonethe...
Free polynilpotent groups and the Magnus property
Free polynilpotent groups and the Magnus property
Abstract
Motivated by a classic result for free groups, one says that a group
G has the Magnus property if the following holds: Whenever two
elements generate the sa...
Gustav Magnus und seine Berliner Physiker-Schule
Gustav Magnus und seine Berliner Physiker-Schule
“Gustav Magnus and His Berlin School of Physicists” by Horst Kant (German language).—Horst Kant examines Gustav Magnus’s “Berlin school of physicists” as an informal yet remarkably...
Das Magnus-Haus und die Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft
Das Magnus-Haus und die Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft
“The Magnus House and the German Physical Society” by Theo Mayer-Kuckuk † (German language).—This essay traces the distinctive relationship between the Magnus House and the German ...
Gustav Magnus und die Physikalische Gesellschaft zu Berlin – ein ambivalentes Verhältnis?
Gustav Magnus und die Physikalische Gesellschaft zu Berlin – ein ambivalentes Verhältnis?
“Gustav Magnus and the Physical Society of Berlin—An Ambivalent Relationship?” by Wolfgang Schreier (German language).—Wolfgang Schreier examines Gustav Magnus’s ambivalent relatio...
Spaces, Cities, and Homelands
Spaces, Cities, and Homelands
Abstract
This chapter examines how Appian conceptualizes and uses places and spaces in the Roman History. It begins by studying the sightseeing behaviour of Pompeius...
Gustav Magnus – ein Chemiker prägt die Berliner Physik
Gustav Magnus – ein Chemiker prägt die Berliner Physik
“Gustav Magnus—A Chemist Who Shaped Physics in Berlin” by Stefan L. Wolff (German language).—This essay traces Gustav Magnus’s path from a scientist trained in chemistry to the def...

