Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Poly(A) binding KPAF4/5 complex stabilizes kinetoplast mRNAs in Trypanosoma brucei

View through CrossRef
Abstract In Trypanosoma brucei, mitochondrial pre-mRNAs undergo 3′-5′ exonucleolytic processing, 3′ adenylation and uridylation, 5′ pyrophosphate removal, and, often, U-insertion/deletion editing. The 3′ modifications are modulated by pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) Kinetoplast Polyadenylation Factors (KPAFs). We have shown that KPAF3 binding to the 3′ region stabilizes properly trimmed transcripts and stimulates their A-tailing by KPAP1 poly(A) polymerase. Conversely, poly(A) binding KPAF4 shields the nascent A-tail from uridylation and decay thereby protecting pre-mRNA upon KPAF3 displacement by editing. While editing concludes in the 5′ region, KPAF1/2 dimer induces A/U-tailing to activate translation. Remarkably, 5′ end recognition and pyrophosphate hydrolysis by the PPsome complex also contribute to mRNA stabilization. Here, we demonstrate that KPAF4 functions as a heterodimer with KPAF5, a protein lacking discernable motifs. We show that KPAF5 stabilizes KPAF4 to enable poly(A) tail recognition, which likely leads to mRNA stabilization during the editing process and impedes spontaneous translational activation of partially-edited transcripts. Thus, KPAF4/5 represents a poly(A) binding element of the mitochondrial polyadenylation complex. We present evidence that RNA editing substrate binding complex bridges the 5′ end-bound PPsome and 3′ end-bound polyadenylation complexes. This interaction may enable mRNA circularization, an apparently critical element of mitochondrial mRNA stability and quality control.
Title: Poly(A) binding KPAF4/5 complex stabilizes kinetoplast mRNAs in Trypanosoma brucei
Description:
Abstract In Trypanosoma brucei, mitochondrial pre-mRNAs undergo 3′-5′ exonucleolytic processing, 3′ adenylation and uridylation, 5′ pyrophosphate removal, and, often, U-insertion/deletion editing.
The 3′ modifications are modulated by pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) Kinetoplast Polyadenylation Factors (KPAFs).
We have shown that KPAF3 binding to the 3′ region stabilizes properly trimmed transcripts and stimulates their A-tailing by KPAP1 poly(A) polymerase.
Conversely, poly(A) binding KPAF4 shields the nascent A-tail from uridylation and decay thereby protecting pre-mRNA upon KPAF3 displacement by editing.
While editing concludes in the 5′ region, KPAF1/2 dimer induces A/U-tailing to activate translation.
Remarkably, 5′ end recognition and pyrophosphate hydrolysis by the PPsome complex also contribute to mRNA stabilization.
Here, we demonstrate that KPAF4 functions as a heterodimer with KPAF5, a protein lacking discernable motifs.
We show that KPAF5 stabilizes KPAF4 to enable poly(A) tail recognition, which likely leads to mRNA stabilization during the editing process and impedes spontaneous translational activation of partially-edited transcripts.
Thus, KPAF4/5 represents a poly(A) binding element of the mitochondrial polyadenylation complex.
We present evidence that RNA editing substrate binding complex bridges the 5′ end-bound PPsome and 3′ end-bound polyadenylation complexes.
This interaction may enable mRNA circularization, an apparently critical element of mitochondrial mRNA stability and quality control.

Related Results

Pentatricopeptide repeat poly(A) binding protein KPAF4 stabilizes mitochondrial mRNAs in Trypanosoma brucei
Pentatricopeptide repeat poly(A) binding protein KPAF4 stabilizes mitochondrial mRNAs in Trypanosoma brucei
AbstractIn Trypanosoma brucei, most mitochondrial mRNAs undergo editing, and 3′ adenylation and uridylation. The internal sequence changes and terminal extensions are coordinated: ...
Molecular Detection of <i>Trypanosoma</i> Species Infecting Small Ruminants in some parts of Plateau State, Nigeria
Molecular Detection of <i>Trypanosoma</i> Species Infecting Small Ruminants in some parts of Plateau State, Nigeria
Trypanosomes occupy a unique position among infectious agents because they are one of the most studied and poorly understood parasitic organisms, particularly regarding their compl...
Pentatricopeptide repeat poly(A) binding protein from mitochondria of trypanosomes
Pentatricopeptide repeat poly(A) binding protein from mitochondria of trypanosomes
AbstractIn Trypanosoma brucei, most mitochondrial mRNAs undergo U-insertion/deletion editing, and 3′ adenylation and uridylation. The internal sequence changes and terminal extensi...
Clinicopathological and Microscopic Features of Trypanosoma brucei and Trypanosoma evansi Induced Infections in Sheep II
Clinicopathological and Microscopic Features of Trypanosoma brucei and Trypanosoma evansi Induced Infections in Sheep II
The present study elucidates further on clinical, gross, and microscopic pathologies induced by single or mixed infections with  Trypanosoma evansi and Trypanosoma brucei in sheep....
Differential virulence and tsetse fly transmissibility of <i>Trypanosoma congolense</i> and <i>Trypanosoma brucei</i> strains
Differential virulence and tsetse fly transmissibility of <i>Trypanosoma congolense</i> and <i>Trypanosoma brucei</i> strains
African animal trypanosomiasis causes significant economic losses in sub-Saharan African countries because of livestock mortalities and reduced productivity. Trypanosomes, the caus...
Monoclonal antibodies that distinguish Trypanosoma congolense, T. vivax and T. brucei
Monoclonal antibodies that distinguish Trypanosoma congolense, T. vivax and T. brucei
Summary Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) were derived against in‐vitro‐propagated procyclic forms of Trypanosoma congolense, T. vivax, T. brucei brucei and T. b. rhodesiense in order ...

Back to Top