Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Erratum
View through CrossRef
Wagner, J., Luyster, R.J., Moustapha, H., Tager-Flusberg, H., and Nelson, C. A. (2016). Differential attention to faces in infant siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder and associations with later social and language ability. International Journal of Behavioral Development. Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/0165025416673475 Owing to errors made by SAGE, the above mentioned article, first published online on November 8th 2016, contained errors. SAGE apologises to the authors and to the readers. The following corrections apply: Line 6 of the article abstract originally read ‘For time scanning faces overall, HRA- and LRC showed similar patterns of attention, and this was significantly greater than in HRA-.’ This has been corrected to read ‘For time scanning faces overall, HRA+ and LRC showed similar patterns of attention, and this was significantly greater than in HRA-.’ The last line of the caption for Figure 2 originally read ‘Error bars are + standard error to the mean.’ This has been corrected to read ‘Error bars are +/- standard error to the mean.’ The formatting of Table 2 was incorrect. The correct table is presented below: [Table: see text] These corrections have been made in the most recent online version of the article, and will also be included in all subsequent versions of the article online and in print.
Title: Erratum
Description:
Wagner, J.
, Luyster, R.
J.
, Moustapha, H.
, Tager-Flusberg, H.
, and Nelson, C.
A.
(2016).
Differential attention to faces in infant siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder and associations with later social and language ability.
International Journal of Behavioral Development.
Epub ahead of print.
doi: 10.
1177/0165025416673475 Owing to errors made by SAGE, the above mentioned article, first published online on November 8th 2016, contained errors.
SAGE apologises to the authors and to the readers.
The following corrections apply: Line 6 of the article abstract originally read ‘For time scanning faces overall, HRA- and LRC showed similar patterns of attention, and this was significantly greater than in HRA-.
’ This has been corrected to read ‘For time scanning faces overall, HRA+ and LRC showed similar patterns of attention, and this was significantly greater than in HRA-.
’ The last line of the caption for Figure 2 originally read ‘Error bars are + standard error to the mean.
’ This has been corrected to read ‘Error bars are +/- standard error to the mean.
’ The formatting of Table 2 was incorrect.
The correct table is presented below: [Table: see text] These corrections have been made in the most recent online version of the article, and will also be included in all subsequent versions of the article online and in print.
Related Results
Editors’ Note
Editors’ Note
In 2016 and 2017, Sociological Research Online published the following article and two subsequent responses: Gorard S (2016) Damaging Real Lives Through Obstinacy: Re-emphasising ...
Notice of forthcoming erratum
Notice of forthcoming erratum
The recently published peer-reviewed protocol article entitled Purification of Islets of Langerhans from Porcine Pancreas by John M. Graham (TheScientificWorldJOURNAL (2002) 2, 165...
Cascaded frequency conversion under nonlinear stimulated Raman adiabatic passage: erratum
Cascaded frequency conversion under nonlinear stimulated Raman adiabatic passage: erratum
We present an erratum to our Letter [Opt. Lett.
46, 1486 (2021)OPLEDP0146-959210.1364/OL.418085]. This
erratum corrects an inadvertent error in defining the electric fiel...

