Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Assessment of Immigrants’ Premium and Tax Payments for Health Care and the Costs of Their Care
View through CrossRef
ImportanceSome worry that immigrants burden the US economy and particularly the health care system. However, no analyses to date have assessed whether immigrants’ payments for premiums and taxes that fund health care programs exceed third-party payers’ expenditures on their behalf.ObjectiveTo assess immigrants’ net financial contributions to US health care programs.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional analysis used 2017 data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and the Current Population Survey (CPS) and 2014 to 2018 data from the American Community Survey. The main analyses used data from the calendar year 2017. Data from the calendar years 2012 to 2016 were also reported. Data were analyzed from June 15, 2020, to August 14, 2022. Participants comprised 210 669 community-dwelling respondents to the MEPS and CPS (main analysis) and nursing home residents who were included in the American Community Survey (additional analysis).ExposuresCitizenship and immigration status.Main Outcomes and MeasuresTotal and per capita payments for premiums and taxes that fund health care as well as third-party payers’ expenditures for health care in 2018 US dollars.ResultsAmong 210 669 participants, 51.0% were female, 18.3% were Hispanic, 12.3% were non-Hispanic Black, 60.3% were non-Hispanic White, and 9.2% were of other races and/or ethnicities. A total of 180 084 participants were respondents to the 2018 CPS, and 30 585 were respondents to the 2017 MEPS. Among the 180 084 CPS respondents, immigrants accounted for 14.1% (weighted to be nationally representative), with the subgroup of citizen immigrants accounting for 6.8%, documented noncitizen immigrants accounting for 3.7%, and undocumented immigrants accounting for 3.6%; US-born citizens constituted 85.9% of the population. Relative to US-born citizens, immigrants were more often age 18 to 64 years (79.6% vs 58.3%), of Hispanic ethnicity (45.0% vs 14.0%), and uninsured (16.8% vs 7.4%); similar percentages (51.4% vs 50.9%) were female. US-born citizens vs immigrants paid similar amounts in premiums and taxes ($6269 per capita [95% CI, $6185-$6353 per capita] vs $6345 per capita [95% CI, $6220-$6470 per capita]). However, third-party expenditures for immigrants’ health care ($5061 per capita; 95% CI, $4673-$5448 per capita) were lower than their expenditures for the care of US-born citizens ($6511 per capita; 95% CI, $6275-$6747 per capita). Immigrants, in general, paid significantly more per person (net contribution, $1284; 95% CI, $876-$1691) than was paid on their behalf. Most of this surplus was accounted for by undocumented immigrants, whose contributions exceeded their expenditures by $4418 per person (95% CI, $4047-$4789 per person). US-born citizens collectively paid $67.2 billion (95% CI, −$2.3 to $136.3 billion) less in premiums and taxes than third-party payers paid for their care. This deficit was mostly offset by the $58.3 billion (95% CI, $39.8-$76.8 billion) net surplus of payments from immigrants, 89% of which ($51.9 billion; 95% CI, $47.5-$56.3 billion) was attributable to undocumented immigrants.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, immigrants appeared to subsidize the health care of other US residents, suggesting that concerns that immigrants deplete health care resources may be unfounded.
American Medical Association (AMA)
Title: Assessment of Immigrants’ Premium and Tax Payments for Health Care and the Costs of Their Care
Description:
ImportanceSome worry that immigrants burden the US economy and particularly the health care system.
However, no analyses to date have assessed whether immigrants’ payments for premiums and taxes that fund health care programs exceed third-party payers’ expenditures on their behalf.
ObjectiveTo assess immigrants’ net financial contributions to US health care programs.
Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional analysis used 2017 data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and the Current Population Survey (CPS) and 2014 to 2018 data from the American Community Survey.
The main analyses used data from the calendar year 2017.
Data from the calendar years 2012 to 2016 were also reported.
Data were analyzed from June 15, 2020, to August 14, 2022.
Participants comprised 210 669 community-dwelling respondents to the MEPS and CPS (main analysis) and nursing home residents who were included in the American Community Survey (additional analysis).
ExposuresCitizenship and immigration status.
Main Outcomes and MeasuresTotal and per capita payments for premiums and taxes that fund health care as well as third-party payers’ expenditures for health care in 2018 US dollars.
ResultsAmong 210 669 participants, 51.
0% were female, 18.
3% were Hispanic, 12.
3% were non-Hispanic Black, 60.
3% were non-Hispanic White, and 9.
2% were of other races and/or ethnicities.
A total of 180 084 participants were respondents to the 2018 CPS, and 30 585 were respondents to the 2017 MEPS.
Among the 180 084 CPS respondents, immigrants accounted for 14.
1% (weighted to be nationally representative), with the subgroup of citizen immigrants accounting for 6.
8%, documented noncitizen immigrants accounting for 3.
7%, and undocumented immigrants accounting for 3.
6%; US-born citizens constituted 85.
9% of the population.
Relative to US-born citizens, immigrants were more often age 18 to 64 years (79.
6% vs 58.
3%), of Hispanic ethnicity (45.
0% vs 14.
0%), and uninsured (16.
8% vs 7.
4%); similar percentages (51.
4% vs 50.
9%) were female.
US-born citizens vs immigrants paid similar amounts in premiums and taxes ($6269 per capita [95% CI, $6185-$6353 per capita] vs $6345 per capita [95% CI, $6220-$6470 per capita]).
However, third-party expenditures for immigrants’ health care ($5061 per capita; 95% CI, $4673-$5448 per capita) were lower than their expenditures for the care of US-born citizens ($6511 per capita; 95% CI, $6275-$6747 per capita).
Immigrants, in general, paid significantly more per person (net contribution, $1284; 95% CI, $876-$1691) than was paid on their behalf.
Most of this surplus was accounted for by undocumented immigrants, whose contributions exceeded their expenditures by $4418 per person (95% CI, $4047-$4789 per person).
US-born citizens collectively paid $67.
2 billion (95% CI, −$2.
3 to $136.
3 billion) less in premiums and taxes than third-party payers paid for their care.
This deficit was mostly offset by the $58.
3 billion (95% CI, $39.
8-$76.
8 billion) net surplus of payments from immigrants, 89% of which ($51.
9 billion; 95% CI, $47.
5-$56.
3 billion) was attributable to undocumented immigrants.
Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, immigrants appeared to subsidize the health care of other US residents, suggesting that concerns that immigrants deplete health care resources may be unfounded.
Related Results
The impact of attitude towards an e-tax system on tax compliance of Vietnamese enterprises: Adoption of an e-tax system as a mediator
The impact of attitude towards an e-tax system on tax compliance of Vietnamese enterprises: Adoption of an e-tax system as a mediator
PURPOSE: Tax compliance is a topic of concern for many scholars all over the world. Most of them point out factors affecting tax compliance, and one significant factor is the adopt...
TAX PLANNING IN THE ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
TAX PLANNING IN THE ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
The differences between the concepts of “tax planning”, “tax minimization” and “tax optimization” are investigated and it is established that tax minimization is the maximum reduct...
FEATURES OF CORPORATE INCOME TAX IN KAZAKHSTAN
FEATURES OF CORPORATE INCOME TAX IN KAZAKHSTAN
The relevance of the article is that today one of the fundamentally important problems is to strengthen the financial system and ensure the entry of the national economy of Kazakhs...
The Influence of Tax Knowledge, Tax Service Quality, Tax Audit, and Use of Tax Sanctions on Tax Evasion: The Case Study of KPP Pratama Seberang Ulu 1 Palembang
The Influence of Tax Knowledge, Tax Service Quality, Tax Audit, and Use of Tax Sanctions on Tax Evasion: The Case Study of KPP Pratama Seberang Ulu 1 Palembang
Tax evasion and tax avoidance and is part of tax planning which aims to reduce the amount of tax payments. As an illegal act, it is clear that tax evasion violates the law so that...
An Analysis of the Severance Tax
An Analysis of the Severance Tax
The purposes of this thesis are to examine the strengths and weaknesses of the severance tax, to study the methods of administering the severance tax and to examine the severance t...
Tax non-compliance among SMCs in Malaysia: tax audit evidence
Tax non-compliance among SMCs in Malaysia: tax audit evidence
Purpose– The pervasiveness of tax non-compliance remains a serious concern to most tax authorities around the world. The negative impact of tax non-compliance on the economy and th...
The tax compliance burden in the functioning of small and medium-sized enterprises in the Durban Central Business District
The tax compliance burden in the functioning of small and medium-sized enterprises in the Durban Central Business District
Several attempts have been made to examine the effect of tax compliance burden in the functioning of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) but to date, tax compliance is still ...
Gross and net tax shield valuation
Gross and net tax shield valuation
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to show that distinguishing between gross and net tax shields arising from interest deductions is important to firm valuation. The distinction ...

