Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Assessment of Immigrants’ Premium and Tax Payments for Health Care and the Costs of Their Care
View through CrossRef
ImportanceSome worry that immigrants burden the US economy and particularly the health care system. However, no analyses to date have assessed whether immigrants’ payments for premiums and taxes that fund health care programs exceed third-party payers’ expenditures on their behalf.ObjectiveTo assess immigrants’ net financial contributions to US health care programs.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional analysis used 2017 data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and the Current Population Survey (CPS) and 2014 to 2018 data from the American Community Survey. The main analyses used data from the calendar year 2017. Data from the calendar years 2012 to 2016 were also reported. Data were analyzed from June 15, 2020, to August 14, 2022. Participants comprised 210 669 community-dwelling respondents to the MEPS and CPS (main analysis) and nursing home residents who were included in the American Community Survey (additional analysis).ExposuresCitizenship and immigration status.Main Outcomes and MeasuresTotal and per capita payments for premiums and taxes that fund health care as well as third-party payers’ expenditures for health care in 2018 US dollars.ResultsAmong 210 669 participants, 51.0% were female, 18.3% were Hispanic, 12.3% were non-Hispanic Black, 60.3% were non-Hispanic White, and 9.2% were of other races and/or ethnicities. A total of 180 084 participants were respondents to the 2018 CPS, and 30 585 were respondents to the 2017 MEPS. Among the 180 084 CPS respondents, immigrants accounted for 14.1% (weighted to be nationally representative), with the subgroup of citizen immigrants accounting for 6.8%, documented noncitizen immigrants accounting for 3.7%, and undocumented immigrants accounting for 3.6%; US-born citizens constituted 85.9% of the population. Relative to US-born citizens, immigrants were more often age 18 to 64 years (79.6% vs 58.3%), of Hispanic ethnicity (45.0% vs 14.0%), and uninsured (16.8% vs 7.4%); similar percentages (51.4% vs 50.9%) were female. US-born citizens vs immigrants paid similar amounts in premiums and taxes ($6269 per capita [95% CI, $6185-$6353 per capita] vs $6345 per capita [95% CI, $6220-$6470 per capita]). However, third-party expenditures for immigrants’ health care ($5061 per capita; 95% CI, $4673-$5448 per capita) were lower than their expenditures for the care of US-born citizens ($6511 per capita; 95% CI, $6275-$6747 per capita). Immigrants, in general, paid significantly more per person (net contribution, $1284; 95% CI, $876-$1691) than was paid on their behalf. Most of this surplus was accounted for by undocumented immigrants, whose contributions exceeded their expenditures by $4418 per person (95% CI, $4047-$4789 per person). US-born citizens collectively paid $67.2 billion (95% CI, −$2.3 to $136.3 billion) less in premiums and taxes than third-party payers paid for their care. This deficit was mostly offset by the $58.3 billion (95% CI, $39.8-$76.8 billion) net surplus of payments from immigrants, 89% of which ($51.9 billion; 95% CI, $47.5-$56.3 billion) was attributable to undocumented immigrants.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, immigrants appeared to subsidize the health care of other US residents, suggesting that concerns that immigrants deplete health care resources may be unfounded.
American Medical Association (AMA)
Title: Assessment of Immigrants’ Premium and Tax Payments for Health Care and the Costs of Their Care
Description:
ImportanceSome worry that immigrants burden the US economy and particularly the health care system.
However, no analyses to date have assessed whether immigrants’ payments for premiums and taxes that fund health care programs exceed third-party payers’ expenditures on their behalf.
ObjectiveTo assess immigrants’ net financial contributions to US health care programs.
Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional analysis used 2017 data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and the Current Population Survey (CPS) and 2014 to 2018 data from the American Community Survey.
The main analyses used data from the calendar year 2017.
Data from the calendar years 2012 to 2016 were also reported.
Data were analyzed from June 15, 2020, to August 14, 2022.
Participants comprised 210 669 community-dwelling respondents to the MEPS and CPS (main analysis) and nursing home residents who were included in the American Community Survey (additional analysis).
ExposuresCitizenship and immigration status.
Main Outcomes and MeasuresTotal and per capita payments for premiums and taxes that fund health care as well as third-party payers’ expenditures for health care in 2018 US dollars.
ResultsAmong 210 669 participants, 51.
0% were female, 18.
3% were Hispanic, 12.
3% were non-Hispanic Black, 60.
3% were non-Hispanic White, and 9.
2% were of other races and/or ethnicities.
A total of 180 084 participants were respondents to the 2018 CPS, and 30 585 were respondents to the 2017 MEPS.
Among the 180 084 CPS respondents, immigrants accounted for 14.
1% (weighted to be nationally representative), with the subgroup of citizen immigrants accounting for 6.
8%, documented noncitizen immigrants accounting for 3.
7%, and undocumented immigrants accounting for 3.
6%; US-born citizens constituted 85.
9% of the population.
Relative to US-born citizens, immigrants were more often age 18 to 64 years (79.
6% vs 58.
3%), of Hispanic ethnicity (45.
0% vs 14.
0%), and uninsured (16.
8% vs 7.
4%); similar percentages (51.
4% vs 50.
9%) were female.
US-born citizens vs immigrants paid similar amounts in premiums and taxes ($6269 per capita [95% CI, $6185-$6353 per capita] vs $6345 per capita [95% CI, $6220-$6470 per capita]).
However, third-party expenditures for immigrants’ health care ($5061 per capita; 95% CI, $4673-$5448 per capita) were lower than their expenditures for the care of US-born citizens ($6511 per capita; 95% CI, $6275-$6747 per capita).
Immigrants, in general, paid significantly more per person (net contribution, $1284; 95% CI, $876-$1691) than was paid on their behalf.
Most of this surplus was accounted for by undocumented immigrants, whose contributions exceeded their expenditures by $4418 per person (95% CI, $4047-$4789 per person).
US-born citizens collectively paid $67.
2 billion (95% CI, −$2.
3 to $136.
3 billion) less in premiums and taxes than third-party payers paid for their care.
This deficit was mostly offset by the $58.
3 billion (95% CI, $39.
8-$76.
8 billion) net surplus of payments from immigrants, 89% of which ($51.
9 billion; 95% CI, $47.
5-$56.
3 billion) was attributable to undocumented immigrants.
Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, immigrants appeared to subsidize the health care of other US residents, suggesting that concerns that immigrants deplete health care resources may be unfounded.
Related Results
Simplified Budget Preparation
Simplified Budget Preparation
In the present economic system the budget preparation is massive, multi staged, time consuming and laborious process. There are thousands of different high or very low valued goods...
THE ROLE OF TAX KNOWLEDGE AS A MODERATION IN THE RELATIONSHIP OF TAX SANCTIONS, TAX AUDIT, AND TAX AMNESTY TOWARDS CORPORATE TAX COMPLIANCE
THE ROLE OF TAX KNOWLEDGE AS A MODERATION IN THE RELATIONSHIP OF TAX SANCTIONS, TAX AUDIT, AND TAX AMNESTY TOWARDS CORPORATE TAX COMPLIANCE
Tax is a source of state revenue that plays an important role in the development and improvement of a country's economy. According to Law Number 16 of 2009 concerning the fourth am...
The impact of attitude towards an e-tax system on tax compliance of Vietnamese enterprises: Adoption of an e-tax system as a mediator
The impact of attitude towards an e-tax system on tax compliance of Vietnamese enterprises: Adoption of an e-tax system as a mediator
PURPOSE: Tax compliance is a topic of concern for many scholars all over the world. Most of them point out factors affecting tax compliance, and one significant factor is the adopt...
TAX PLANNING IN THE ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
TAX PLANNING IN THE ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
The differences between the concepts of “tax planning”, “tax minimization” and “tax optimization” are investigated and it is established that tax minimization is the maximum reduct...
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
1 INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 5 -- 2 GENERAL BACKGROUND: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 7 -- 2.1 CHRONIC AND COMPLEX MENTAL DISORDERS: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE -- S...
FEATURES OF CORPORATE INCOME TAX IN KAZAKHSTAN
FEATURES OF CORPORATE INCOME TAX IN KAZAKHSTAN
The relevance of the article is that today one of the fundamentally important problems is to strengthen the financial system and ensure the entry of the national economy of Kazakhs...
The Influence of Tax Knowledge, Tax Service Quality, Tax Audit, and Use of Tax Sanctions on Tax Evasion: The Case Study of KPP Pratama Seberang Ulu 1 Palembang
The Influence of Tax Knowledge, Tax Service Quality, Tax Audit, and Use of Tax Sanctions on Tax Evasion: The Case Study of KPP Pratama Seberang Ulu 1 Palembang
Tax evasion and tax avoidance and is part of tax planning which aims to reduce the amount of tax payments. As an illegal act, it is clear that tax evasion violates the law so that...
<b>Factors that Influence the Taxpayers’ Perception of the Tax Evasion: Evidence from Pakistan</b>
<b>Factors that Influence the Taxpayers’ Perception of the Tax Evasion: Evidence from Pakistan</b>
The research study's aim is to investigate and identify factors influencing tax evasion (Tax system, Tax knowledge, Tax fairness, Tax Morale, and Tax compliance cost). It also exp...

