Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

THE INTUBATION CHALLENGE: COMPARING MODIFIED MALLAMPATI SCORE AND THYROMENTAL DISTANCE

View through CrossRef
Airway management is a cornerstone of safe anesthesia practice, and failure to anticipate a difficult airway can result in life-threatening complications. The Modified Mallampati Score (MMS) and Thyromental Distance Test (TMDT) are among the most widely used preoperative predictors. However, when used individually, their predictive accuracy remains variable. Combining these tests may improve diagnostic performance and support safer airway management in surgical patients. Objective: To evaluate and compare the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of MMS and TMDT individually and in combination for predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients undergoing elective surgery. Methods: This comparative observational study enrolled 150 patients with ASA physical status I or II scheduled for elective procedures under general anesthesia. Preoperative airway assessment was performed using MMS and TMDT, with Cormack–Lehane (CL) grading during laryngoscopy serving as the gold standard. Demographic data, surgical specialty, intubator experience, and the use of special equipment were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each test and their combination. Results: MMS showed a sensitivity of 42.3%, specificity of 92.0%, PPV of 52.3%, and NPV of 88.4%. TMDT had a sensitivity of 23.07%, specificity of 92.0%, PPV of 37.5%, and NPV of 85.1%. The combined use of MMS and TMDT improved specificity to 98.4%, PPV to 66.7%, and maintained a high NPV of 84.8%, though sensitivity decreased to 15.4%. Difficult intubations were more frequent in females (80.8%) and general surgery cases (100%), while the use of special equipment was significantly associated with difficulty (p = 0.000). Conclusion: While neither MMS nor TMDT alone offers both high sensitivity and specificity, their combined use enhances diagnostic accuracy and should be considered a valuable component of routine preoperative airway assessment.  
Title: THE INTUBATION CHALLENGE: COMPARING MODIFIED MALLAMPATI SCORE AND THYROMENTAL DISTANCE
Description:
Airway management is a cornerstone of safe anesthesia practice, and failure to anticipate a difficult airway can result in life-threatening complications.
The Modified Mallampati Score (MMS) and Thyromental Distance Test (TMDT) are among the most widely used preoperative predictors.
However, when used individually, their predictive accuracy remains variable.
Combining these tests may improve diagnostic performance and support safer airway management in surgical patients.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of MMS and TMDT individually and in combination for predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients undergoing elective surgery.
Methods: This comparative observational study enrolled 150 patients with ASA physical status I or II scheduled for elective procedures under general anesthesia.
Preoperative airway assessment was performed using MMS and TMDT, with Cormack–Lehane (CL) grading during laryngoscopy serving as the gold standard.
Demographic data, surgical specialty, intubator experience, and the use of special equipment were recorded.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each test and their combination.
Results: MMS showed a sensitivity of 42.
3%, specificity of 92.
0%, PPV of 52.
3%, and NPV of 88.
4%.
TMDT had a sensitivity of 23.
07%, specificity of 92.
0%, PPV of 37.
5%, and NPV of 85.
1%.
The combined use of MMS and TMDT improved specificity to 98.
4%, PPV to 66.
7%, and maintained a high NPV of 84.
8%, though sensitivity decreased to 15.
4%.
Difficult intubations were more frequent in females (80.
8%) and general surgery cases (100%), while the use of special equipment was significantly associated with difficulty (p = 0.
000).
Conclusion: While neither MMS nor TMDT alone offers both high sensitivity and specificity, their combined use enhances diagnostic accuracy and should be considered a valuable component of routine preoperative airway assessment.
 .

Related Results

Anticipation of Difficult Airway by Neck Circumference to Thyromental Distance Ratio
Anticipation of Difficult Airway by Neck Circumference to Thyromental Distance Ratio
INTRODUCTIONUnanticipated difficult intubation scenario is a major concern for anaesthetists which contributes to perioperative morbidity and mortality. Characteristics of difficult ...
Rocuronium versus Cisatracurium for Rapid Sequence Induction of Anesthesia in Morbidly Obese Patients
Rocuronium versus Cisatracurium for Rapid Sequence Induction of Anesthesia in Morbidly Obese Patients
Introduction and Aim: Obesity is a challenging problem for anesthetists. Difficult airway with risk of aspiration and regurgitation increases with obesity. Therefore, the need for ...
A spray-as-you-go airway topical anesthesia attenuates cardiovascular responses for double-lumen tube tracheal intubation
A spray-as-you-go airway topical anesthesia attenuates cardiovascular responses for double-lumen tube tracheal intubation
Abstract Background: The spray-as-you-go airway topical anesthesia and nerve block technique are commonly used in awake tracheal intubation. However, their effects have not...
Approach Combining the Airway Scope and the Bougie for Minimizing Movement of the Cervical Spine during Endotracheal Intubation
Approach Combining the Airway Scope and the Bougie for Minimizing Movement of the Cervical Spine during Endotracheal Intubation
Background The Airway Scope (AWS, AWS-S100; Hoya-Pentax, Tokyo, Japan), a recently introduced video laryngoscope, has been reported to reduce movement of the cervical s...
Clinical evaluation of Ambu® AuraGain™ as a conduit for intubation in paediatric patients: a descriptive study
Clinical evaluation of Ambu® AuraGain™ as a conduit for intubation in paediatric patients: a descriptive study
Introduction: Many paediatric difficult airway guidelines have recommended supraglottic airway devices (SGAs) as an indispensable tool in the algorithm for managing failed intubati...
Comparing Hemodynamic Variability During Intubation Using Macintosh and Video Laryngoscopy in Difficult Airway
Comparing Hemodynamic Variability During Intubation Using Macintosh and Video Laryngoscopy in Difficult Airway
Background: Hemodynamic alterations during intubation can significantly impact patient outcomes, especially in difficult airway scenarios, yet there is limited comparative research...

Back to Top