Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Door to needle time for thrombolysis: A secondary analysis of the TIPS cluster randomized controlled trial

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background The Thrombolysis ImPlementation in Stroke (TIPS) study evaluated a hospital-based intervention aimed at improving the rates of intravenous thrombolysis in Australia. The current study assessed the effects of this intervention on the door-to-needle time for intravenous thrombolysis and also determined the intervention effects on door-to-needle time within metropolitan and non-metropolitan hospital locations. Methods TIPS was a clustered randomized controlled trial that involved 20 hospitals in Australia, with 10 hospitals receiving a multi-component practice-change intervention. De-identified patient data collected in the trial included the arrival, assessment, and treatment times for acute ischemic stroke patients. A posthoc exploration using mixed-effects regression modelling was used to assess intervention effects on door-to-needle time, and the effects within hospital location (metropolitan versus non-metropolitan). Results The intervention vs. control difference in the door-to-needle times was non-significant overall or within a hospital location. To provide additional context for the findings, we also evaluated the results within each intervention hospitals. During the active-intervention period, the intervention hospitals showed a significant decrease in the door-to-needle time of 9.25 minutes (95%CI: -16.93, -1.57), but during the post-intervention period, the result was not significant. During the active intervention period, control hospitals showed a significant decrease in the door-to-needle time of 5.26 minutes (95% CI: -8.37; -2.14) and during the post-intervention period, the decrease was 12.13 minutes (95%CI: -17.44, -6.81). Conclusion Across these primary stroke care centres in Australia, a secular trend towards shorter door-to-needle times across both intervention and control hospitals was evident. The intervention resulted in only a modest but significant reduction within experimental groups during the active intervention period, which was not sustained during the post-intervention period.
Title: Door to needle time for thrombolysis: A secondary analysis of the TIPS cluster randomized controlled trial
Description:
Abstract Background The Thrombolysis ImPlementation in Stroke (TIPS) study evaluated a hospital-based intervention aimed at improving the rates of intravenous thrombolysis in Australia.
The current study assessed the effects of this intervention on the door-to-needle time for intravenous thrombolysis and also determined the intervention effects on door-to-needle time within metropolitan and non-metropolitan hospital locations.
Methods TIPS was a clustered randomized controlled trial that involved 20 hospitals in Australia, with 10 hospitals receiving a multi-component practice-change intervention.
De-identified patient data collected in the trial included the arrival, assessment, and treatment times for acute ischemic stroke patients.
A posthoc exploration using mixed-effects regression modelling was used to assess intervention effects on door-to-needle time, and the effects within hospital location (metropolitan versus non-metropolitan).
Results The intervention vs.
control difference in the door-to-needle times was non-significant overall or within a hospital location.
To provide additional context for the findings, we also evaluated the results within each intervention hospitals.
During the active-intervention period, the intervention hospitals showed a significant decrease in the door-to-needle time of 9.
25 minutes (95%CI: -16.
93, -1.
57), but during the post-intervention period, the result was not significant.
During the active intervention period, control hospitals showed a significant decrease in the door-to-needle time of 5.
26 minutes (95% CI: -8.
37; -2.
14) and during the post-intervention period, the decrease was 12.
13 minutes (95%CI: -17.
44, -6.
81).
Conclusion Across these primary stroke care centres in Australia, a secular trend towards shorter door-to-needle times across both intervention and control hospitals was evident.
The intervention resulted in only a modest but significant reduction within experimental groups during the active intervention period, which was not sustained during the post-intervention period.

Related Results

Frequency of in-Hospital complications in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction with and without thrombolysis.
Frequency of in-Hospital complications in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction with and without thrombolysis.
Objective: To compare the frequency of in-hospital complications in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction with and without thrombolysis. Study Design: Descriptive...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Constructing a VANET based on cluster chains
Constructing a VANET based on cluster chains
SUMMARYThe paper proposes a scheme on constructing a vehicular ad‐hoc network based on cluster chains. In the cluster construction algorithm, the distance from a potential cluster ...
Abstract WMP1: Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Mechanical Thrombectomy: the THRACE Randomized Trial
Abstract WMP1: Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Mechanical Thrombectomy: the THRACE Randomized Trial
Background and purpose: The benefit of mechanical thrombectomy added to intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke has been largely demonstrated. H...

Back to Top