Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Arthur Schopenhauer
View through CrossRef
Arthur Schopenhauer (b. 1788–d. 1860) was a private scholar and philosopher. Although Schopenhauer was largely ignored by the professional academic philosophical community during his lifetime, he exerted increasing influence on German and international philosophy, literature, and the arts later in life and more profoundly after his death. Schopenhauer’s philosophy can be explained as a distinctly original synthesis of Kant, Plato, and Eastern thought, especially Hinduism and Buddhism. Schopenhauer understands his philosophy as the true heir of Kant’s critical idealism, on some parts of which Schopenhauer develops his own brand of post-Kantian transcendental idealism. The world for Schopenhauer has two aspects: the phenomenal world we experience in sensation and perception, and a transcendental world of Kantian Thing-in-itself, which Schopenhauer identifies with Will. The world as Will is pure willing, for Schopenhauer, in the sense that it is uncaused, undirected, unmotivated blind urging. The Will is willing without willing anything in particular, or for any particular reason, and even without any cause, while lacking all logical and mathematical properties. The world as Will, lacking any specific object, is inevitably objectified in the world as representation in conflict, strife, competition, opposition, and suffering. The world in reality, identified by Schopenhauer as Will, because it must be objectified in conflict, is seen by Schopenhauer philosophically, for this reason, from a technically pessimistic perspective. The Kantian distinction between the mind’s experiential world (Vorstellung) and Thing-in-itself, the world as it is in itself and independently of thought (Ding an sich), interpreted by Schopenhauer not as Kantian noumenon but knowable intuitively and supported by metaphysical reasoning as pure willing (der Wille), links together all the several parts of Schopenhauer’s philosophical system, like spokes from a wheel’s hub. Beginning with his epistemology and metaphysics, and proceeding systematically to his philosophy of science, logic and mathematics; philosophy of religion; philosophy of art; ethics, moral, and political philosophy, Schopenhauer encourages the image of a flower opening when he describes developing the several related parts of his philosophy as the progressive unfolding of a single idea.
Title: Arthur Schopenhauer
Description:
Arthur Schopenhauer (b.
1788–d.
1860) was a private scholar and philosopher.
Although Schopenhauer was largely ignored by the professional academic philosophical community during his lifetime, he exerted increasing influence on German and international philosophy, literature, and the arts later in life and more profoundly after his death.
Schopenhauer’s philosophy can be explained as a distinctly original synthesis of Kant, Plato, and Eastern thought, especially Hinduism and Buddhism.
Schopenhauer understands his philosophy as the true heir of Kant’s critical idealism, on some parts of which Schopenhauer develops his own brand of post-Kantian transcendental idealism.
The world for Schopenhauer has two aspects: the phenomenal world we experience in sensation and perception, and a transcendental world of Kantian Thing-in-itself, which Schopenhauer identifies with Will.
The world as Will is pure willing, for Schopenhauer, in the sense that it is uncaused, undirected, unmotivated blind urging.
The Will is willing without willing anything in particular, or for any particular reason, and even without any cause, while lacking all logical and mathematical properties.
The world as Will, lacking any specific object, is inevitably objectified in the world as representation in conflict, strife, competition, opposition, and suffering.
The world in reality, identified by Schopenhauer as Will, because it must be objectified in conflict, is seen by Schopenhauer philosophically, for this reason, from a technically pessimistic perspective.
The Kantian distinction between the mind’s experiential world (Vorstellung) and Thing-in-itself, the world as it is in itself and independently of thought (Ding an sich), interpreted by Schopenhauer not as Kantian noumenon but knowable intuitively and supported by metaphysical reasoning as pure willing (der Wille), links together all the several parts of Schopenhauer’s philosophical system, like spokes from a wheel’s hub.
Beginning with his epistemology and metaphysics, and proceeding systematically to his philosophy of science, logic and mathematics; philosophy of religion; philosophy of art; ethics, moral, and political philosophy, Schopenhauer encourages the image of a flower opening when he describes developing the several related parts of his philosophy as the progressive unfolding of a single idea.
Related Results
Karl Christian Friedrich Krause’s Influence on Schopenhauer’s Philosophy
Karl Christian Friedrich Krause’s Influence on Schopenhauer’s Philosophy
Arthur Schopenhauer and Karl Christian Friedrich Krause used to live in the same house in Dresden in 1815 to 1816. Both Schopenhauer and Krause took a huge interest in Indian philo...
Schopenhauer e a Religião
Schopenhauer e a Religião
O que segue é a tradução do artigo Schopenhauer und die Religion, de Paul Deussen, apresentado pelo autor durante o terceiro Congresso da Schopenhauer-Gesellschaft (Sociedade Schop...
Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and D. H. Lawrence’s Women in Love
Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and D. H. Lawrence’s Women in Love
D. H. Lawrence began to read Schopenhauer and Nietzsche while a student at Nottingham University College. The influence of the two philosophers on his early short stories and his n...
Um epistolário filosófico: a correspondência entre Schopenhauer e Johann August Becker
Um epistolário filosófico: a correspondência entre Schopenhauer e Johann August Becker
A correspondência entre Schopenhauer e seus discípulos – cuja edição italiana eu acabei de finalizar, realizando a tradução e a redação de um aparato crítico novo e completo – é a ...
Reinhold und Schopenhauer - Zwei Denkwelten im Banne von Vorstellung und Wille
Reinhold und Schopenhauer - Zwei Denkwelten im Banne von Vorstellung und Wille
Reinhold und Schopenhauer – Vernunftkritik und Willensfreiheit Um die Jahrhundertwende zum 19. Jahrhundert publizierten Karl Leonhard Reinhold und Arthur Schopenhauer ihre Gedanken...
Schopenhauer e o darwinismo, de David Asher
Schopenhauer e o darwinismo, de David Asher
Antes de qualquer coisa, o leitor do presente artigo encontrará uma grande preocupação de David Asher em transmitir o pensamento filosófico de Schopenhauer para o leitor britânico ...
Karl Kraus lettore di Schopenhauer
Karl Kraus lettore di Schopenhauer
A partir de um artigo de Bernard Adamy, publicado no Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch de 1985 e intitulado Schopenhauer Rezeption bei Karl Kraus, o presente texto pretende pôr em evidência os...
O ateu asceta e o padre hedonista; The ascetic atheist and the hedonistic priest
O ateu asceta e o padre hedonista; The ascetic atheist and the hedonistic priest
Este artigo tem como objetivo propor uma investigação sobre o conceito de Vontade a partir de Malebranche (1638-1715) e Schopenhauer (1788-1860). Partimos do pressuposto de que, gu...


