Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Wellbore Strengthening Uncertainties and Workflow Optimizations

View through CrossRef
Abstract Drilling depleted reservoirs is a challenging operation due to significant mud losses and potential risk of wellbore collapse against shale or high-pressure formations if mud weight has been decreased to mitigate mud losses across depleted reservoirs. Wellbore strengthening is an efficient and reliable technique to enable a continuous drilling operation for formations with different pore pressures such as drilling depleted reservoirs with the high mud weight required to support shale or high-pressure reservoirs. If wellbore strengthening has been designed correctly and successfully executed, it could eliminate the total number of casing stages required to drill formations with different pore pressures separately to avoid mud losses or wellbore collapse during drilling. Decreasing casing stages will ensure reaching the target reservoir with larger casing size, thus improving well productivity. Wellbore strengthening technique includes the initiation of short fractures where bridging particles are used to seal and hold the fractures open and prevent any further propagation inside formation. The hoop stress around wellbore will be increased accordingly and enable drilling such depleted reservoirs with higher mud weights. This paper discusses the methodology and assumptions considered in wellbore strengthening design including fracture propagation and the optimum geometry required to yield maximum wellbore strengthening during drilling. The paper will also propose an optimized workflow to be used as guideline for this application. Wellbore strengthening design includes two main parts: fracture width opening and particle size calculations. There are many different analytical methods which can be used to calculate fracture width including PKN, GDK, etc. This paper presents a case study where all methods were screened and compared to the results of a pseudo-3D fracture propagation model. The most appropriate and reliable analytical method to calculate fracture width distribution inside formation during wellbore strengthening has been identified for complex geomechanical environment such as stress anisotropy field. Fracture half-length is usually assumed in wellbore strengthening design to allow the calculations of fracture width. This assumption is not always right, it is associated with high degree of uncertainties and may not represent the optimum fracture geometry. This paper discusses a new design approach where fracture geometry can be optimized including the optimum ratio between invaded and non-invaded zones and the optimum fracture geometry required to maximize wellbore strengthening during drilling depleted reservoirs. A robust, reliable, and optimized workflow is also suggested in this paper to ensure that all uncertainties associated with wellbore strengthening design have been considered and addressed.
Title: Wellbore Strengthening Uncertainties and Workflow Optimizations
Description:
Abstract Drilling depleted reservoirs is a challenging operation due to significant mud losses and potential risk of wellbore collapse against shale or high-pressure formations if mud weight has been decreased to mitigate mud losses across depleted reservoirs.
Wellbore strengthening is an efficient and reliable technique to enable a continuous drilling operation for formations with different pore pressures such as drilling depleted reservoirs with the high mud weight required to support shale or high-pressure reservoirs.
If wellbore strengthening has been designed correctly and successfully executed, it could eliminate the total number of casing stages required to drill formations with different pore pressures separately to avoid mud losses or wellbore collapse during drilling.
Decreasing casing stages will ensure reaching the target reservoir with larger casing size, thus improving well productivity.
Wellbore strengthening technique includes the initiation of short fractures where bridging particles are used to seal and hold the fractures open and prevent any further propagation inside formation.
The hoop stress around wellbore will be increased accordingly and enable drilling such depleted reservoirs with higher mud weights.
This paper discusses the methodology and assumptions considered in wellbore strengthening design including fracture propagation and the optimum geometry required to yield maximum wellbore strengthening during drilling.
The paper will also propose an optimized workflow to be used as guideline for this application.
Wellbore strengthening design includes two main parts: fracture width opening and particle size calculations.
There are many different analytical methods which can be used to calculate fracture width including PKN, GDK, etc.
This paper presents a case study where all methods were screened and compared to the results of a pseudo-3D fracture propagation model.
The most appropriate and reliable analytical method to calculate fracture width distribution inside formation during wellbore strengthening has been identified for complex geomechanical environment such as stress anisotropy field.
Fracture half-length is usually assumed in wellbore strengthening design to allow the calculations of fracture width.
This assumption is not always right, it is associated with high degree of uncertainties and may not represent the optimum fracture geometry.
This paper discusses a new design approach where fracture geometry can be optimized including the optimum ratio between invaded and non-invaded zones and the optimum fracture geometry required to maximize wellbore strengthening during drilling depleted reservoirs.
A robust, reliable, and optimized workflow is also suggested in this paper to ensure that all uncertainties associated with wellbore strengthening design have been considered and addressed.

Related Results

Wellbore Integrity Management: Dealing With Uncertainties
Wellbore Integrity Management: Dealing With Uncertainties
Abstract Amongst all issues plaguing drilling operations, wellbore instability and failure is still a leading contributor to drilling non-productive time (NPT). Fail...
Underground Blowouts In Deep Well Drilling
Underground Blowouts In Deep Well Drilling
ABSTRACT A kick occurs when the wellbore pressure becomes less than the formation pressure, and formation fluid enters the wellbore. When the flow of formation fl...
Wellbore Strengthening through Squeeze Cementing: A Case Study
Wellbore Strengthening through Squeeze Cementing: A Case Study
Abstract Formation strength is an important parameter in drilling operations pressure control because it indicates the wellbore pressure containment envelope above w...
Actual 3D Shape of Wellbore Trajectory: An Objective Description for Complex Steered Wells
Actual 3D Shape of Wellbore Trajectory: An Objective Description for Complex Steered Wells
Abstract All conventional methods for calculating the trajectory of a wellbore involve assumptions. Most calculations assume that segments of the trajectory can be a...
Wellbore Temperature Prediction and Control Through State Space Model
Wellbore Temperature Prediction and Control Through State Space Model
Abstract The present trend of drilling deeper wells has increased the importance of estimating the wellbore temperature distribution and its variation with time. The...
Application of Downhole Well Integrity Technology in the Petroleum Industry, A Case Study in the Horizontal Wellbore
Application of Downhole Well Integrity Technology in the Petroleum Industry, A Case Study in the Horizontal Wellbore
Abstract Wellbore integrity was a thorny issue in China since hundreds of thousands of wells needed to be repaired annually, leading to cost increase and production ...
Physics - Chemical Modelling of Wellbore Stability In Shale Formations
Physics - Chemical Modelling of Wellbore Stability In Shale Formations
Abstract Quantitative prediction of swelling pressure of shale in terms of all chemical (compositional) and mechanical factors is complex because native shale com...

Back to Top