Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Zagros orogeny: a subduction-dominated process

View through CrossRef
AbstractThis paper presents a synthetic view of the geodynamic evolution of the Zagros orogen within the frame of the Arabia–Eurasia collision. The Zagros orogen and the Iranian plateau preserve a record of the long-standing convergence history between Eurasia and Arabia across the Neo-Tethys, from subduction/obduction processes to present-day collision (from ~ 150 to 0 Ma). We herein combine the results obtained on several geodynamic issues, namely the location of the oceanic suture zone, the age of oceanic closure and collision, the magmatic and geochemical evolution of the Eurasian upper plate during convergence (as testified by the successive Sanandaj–Sirjan, Kermanshah and Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic arcs), theP–T–thistory of the few Zagros blueschists, the convergence characteristics across the Neo-Tethys (kinematic velocities, tomographic constraints, subduction zones and obduction processes), together with a survey of recent results gathered by others. We provide lithospheric-scale reconstructions of the Zagros orogen from ~ 150 to 0 Ma across two SW–NE transects. The evolution of the Zagros orogen is also compared to those of the nearby Turkish and Himalayan orogens. In our geotectonic scenario for the Zagros convergence, we outline three main periods/regimes: (1) the Mid to Late Cretaceous (115–85 Ma) corresponds to a distinctive period of perturbation of subduction processes and interplate mechanical coupling marked by blueschist exhumation and upper-plate fragmentation, (2) the Paleocene–Eocene (60–40 Ma) witnesses slab break-off, major shifts in arc magmatism and distributed extension within the upper plate, and (3) from the Oligocene onwards (~ 30–0 Ma), collision develops with a progressive SW migration of deformation and topographic build-up (Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone: 20–15 Ma, High Zagros: ~12–8 Ma; Simply Folded Belt: 5–0 Ma) and with partial slab tear at depths (~10 Ma to present). Our reconstructions underline the key role played by subduction throughout the whole convergence history. We finally stress that such a long-lasting subduction system with changing boundary conditions also makes the Zagros orogen an ideal natural laboratory for subduction processes.
Title: Zagros orogeny: a subduction-dominated process
Description:
AbstractThis paper presents a synthetic view of the geodynamic evolution of the Zagros orogen within the frame of the Arabia–Eurasia collision.
The Zagros orogen and the Iranian plateau preserve a record of the long-standing convergence history between Eurasia and Arabia across the Neo-Tethys, from subduction/obduction processes to present-day collision (from ~ 150 to 0 Ma).
We herein combine the results obtained on several geodynamic issues, namely the location of the oceanic suture zone, the age of oceanic closure and collision, the magmatic and geochemical evolution of the Eurasian upper plate during convergence (as testified by the successive Sanandaj–Sirjan, Kermanshah and Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic arcs), theP–T–thistory of the few Zagros blueschists, the convergence characteristics across the Neo-Tethys (kinematic velocities, tomographic constraints, subduction zones and obduction processes), together with a survey of recent results gathered by others.
We provide lithospheric-scale reconstructions of the Zagros orogen from ~ 150 to 0 Ma across two SW–NE transects.
The evolution of the Zagros orogen is also compared to those of the nearby Turkish and Himalayan orogens.
In our geotectonic scenario for the Zagros convergence, we outline three main periods/regimes: (1) the Mid to Late Cretaceous (115–85 Ma) corresponds to a distinctive period of perturbation of subduction processes and interplate mechanical coupling marked by blueschist exhumation and upper-plate fragmentation, (2) the Paleocene–Eocene (60–40 Ma) witnesses slab break-off, major shifts in arc magmatism and distributed extension within the upper plate, and (3) from the Oligocene onwards (~ 30–0 Ma), collision develops with a progressive SW migration of deformation and topographic build-up (Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone: 20–15 Ma, High Zagros: ~12–8 Ma; Simply Folded Belt: 5–0 Ma) and with partial slab tear at depths (~10 Ma to present).
Our reconstructions underline the key role played by subduction throughout the whole convergence history.
We finally stress that such a long-lasting subduction system with changing boundary conditions also makes the Zagros orogen an ideal natural laboratory for subduction processes.

Related Results

Geodynamic modelling of continental subduction beneath oceanic lithosphere
Geodynamic modelling of continental subduction beneath oceanic lithosphere
Subduction of an oceanic plate beneath either an oceanic, or a continental, overriding plate requires two main conditions to occur in a steady state: i) a high enough subduction ra...
Dynamics of multiple microcontinent accretion during oceanic subduction
Dynamics of multiple microcontinent accretion during oceanic subduction
Microcontinent accretion during oceanic subduction is one of the main contributors to continental crustal growth. Many of the continental mountain belts we find today were built fr...
Sismotectonique du prisme de la Barbade : implications sur le potentiel sismogénique de la zone de subduction des Antilles
Sismotectonique du prisme de la Barbade : implications sur le potentiel sismogénique de la zone de subduction des Antilles
La zone de subduction des Petites Antilles résulte de la subduction des plaques nord- et sud-américaines sous la plaque Caraïbe dans une direction SW à ~ 2 cm/an. Cette zone pourra...
The fate of Marine Magnetic Anomalies in Subduction Zone
The fate of Marine Magnetic Anomalies in Subduction Zone
Le destin des anomalies magnétiques océaniques en zone de subduction L'objet de cette étude est de comprendre les causes de la diminution des anomalies magnétiques ...
From orogenic range to orogenic plateau, what evolution along the Tethys subduction zone from the Alps to Tibet?
From orogenic range to orogenic plateau, what evolution along the Tethys subduction zone from the Alps to Tibet?
For long, the continental lithosphere considered less dense than the mantle, was not supposed to be able to subduct. Nevertheless, continental subduction has been proposed for deca...
Tracing hotspot traces in the Andes
Tracing hotspot traces in the Andes
Two segments of subduction of the Nazca plate beneath the South American plate occur at low angles based on seismic hypocenter locations, approaching nearly horizontal below ~100 k...

Back to Top