Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Ivan Tomas and the Smuggler for the Pope
View through CrossRef
During the pontificate of Pope Pius XII (1939 - 1958) the relations between the Holy See and the European communist countries were strained or severed. In such circumstances the trial of the Archbishop of Zagreb, Alojzije Stepinac, was held in the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia (FPRY), ending in 1946 when he was sentenced to 16 years in prison. After serving a five-year prison sentence, Stepinac was given a choice to go to Rome or to serve the rest of the sentence under house arrest in his hometown of Krašić. After Stepinac was appointed cardinal in 1953, the FPRY severed diplomatic relations with the Holy See, and Stepinac lost the opportunity to go to Rome and take over the cardinal's insignia.
At the time Croatian Catholic priest Ivan Tomas was working at Vatican Radio in Rome. The result of Tomas's effort and the help of an American tourist of Slovenian origin, Frances Yenko Chilcoat, was an interesting and unusual journey of Stepinac’s cardinal robe and its safe arrival to the territory of the FPRY in 1954. Yenko Chilcoat described her endeavour in a memoir entitled Smuggler for the Pope, published in 2006.
This paper will first explain the international political context of the time of her arrival from the United States of America to Europe and the church-state relations between the Holy See and the FPRY after World War II. Furthermore, the paper will verify the authenticity of Yenko Chilcoat's memoir and the credibility of her claims, analyse Tomas's role in the transfer of the cardinal robe, as well as the consequences of the cardinal robe coming into Stepinac's possession. Finally, a conclusion will be made about the meaning and the importance of Stepinac's cardinal robe transfer from Rome to the FPRY in the context of the contemporary church-state relations.
Title: Ivan Tomas and the Smuggler for the Pope
Description:
During the pontificate of Pope Pius XII (1939 - 1958) the relations between the Holy See and the European communist countries were strained or severed.
In such circumstances the trial of the Archbishop of Zagreb, Alojzije Stepinac, was held in the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia (FPRY), ending in 1946 when he was sentenced to 16 years in prison.
After serving a five-year prison sentence, Stepinac was given a choice to go to Rome or to serve the rest of the sentence under house arrest in his hometown of Krašić.
After Stepinac was appointed cardinal in 1953, the FPRY severed diplomatic relations with the Holy See, and Stepinac lost the opportunity to go to Rome and take over the cardinal's insignia.
At the time Croatian Catholic priest Ivan Tomas was working at Vatican Radio in Rome.
The result of Tomas's effort and the help of an American tourist of Slovenian origin, Frances Yenko Chilcoat, was an interesting and unusual journey of Stepinac’s cardinal robe and its safe arrival to the territory of the FPRY in 1954.
Yenko Chilcoat described her endeavour in a memoir entitled Smuggler for the Pope, published in 2006.
This paper will first explain the international political context of the time of her arrival from the United States of America to Europe and the church-state relations between the Holy See and the FPRY after World War II.
Furthermore, the paper will verify the authenticity of Yenko Chilcoat's memoir and the credibility of her claims, analyse Tomas's role in the transfer of the cardinal robe, as well as the consequences of the cardinal robe coming into Stepinac's possession.
Finally, a conclusion will be made about the meaning and the importance of Stepinac's cardinal robe transfer from Rome to the FPRY in the context of the contemporary church-state relations.
Related Results
Ivan IV the Terrible, Tsar of Russia
Ivan IV the Terrible, Tsar of Russia
Ivan IV (Ivan Vasil’evich, Ivan the Terrible, Ivan Groznyi [the Awe-Inspiring]) was born in 1530 and ruled from 1533 to 1547 as Grand Prince of Moscow and All Russia and from 1547 ...
Features of Ivan Ohiienko's language style
Features of Ivan Ohiienko's language style
The article analyzes the peculiarities of the language style of the outstanding Ukrainian scientist, Professor Ivan Ohiienko. Ivan Ohiienko is known to have made a great contributi...
Entrevista a Fr. Adalberto Cardona Gómez, O.P.
Entrevista a Fr. Adalberto Cardona Gómez, O.P.
Es un honor para la revista Sol de Aquino (SDA) contar con una reflexión hecha por el padre Adalberto Cardona en torno a lo que ha sido el pensamiento de Tomás de Aquino en su vida...
Entrevista a Fr. Adalberto Cardona Gómez, O.P.
Entrevista a Fr. Adalberto Cardona Gómez, O.P.
Es un honor para la revista Sol de Aquino (SDA) contar con una reflexión hecha por el padre Adalberto Cardona en torno a lo que ha sido el pensamiento de Tomás de Aquino en su vida...
Ivan the Terrible as a problem of Russian Philosophy of History
Ivan the Terrible as a problem of Russian Philosophy of History
The purpose of the article is to consider the historiosophical ideas about the personality of Ivan IV the Terrible and his role in the history of the Russian state. To achieve this...
GENDER TERMINOLOGY IN PROJECTION ON IVAN OHPIENKO WORKS
GENDER TERMINOLOGY IN PROJECTION ON IVAN OHPIENKO WORKS
Modern Ukrainian society strives for the formation of gender equal rights for men and women, which should be manifested at the level of social needs, as well as at the level of con...
Linguistic construction of Ivan Ohiienko's epistolary: gender aspect
Linguistic construction of Ivan Ohiienko's epistolary: gender aspect
This article is devoted to analysing the means of communication through correspond-ence between Ivan Ohiienko and male/female representatives In particular, аttention is being give...
Tomás de Aquino - "Comentário às sentenças de Pedro Lombardo", Livro II, distinção 1, questão 1, artigo 5
Tomás de Aquino - "Comentário às sentenças de Pedro Lombardo", Livro II, distinção 1, questão 1, artigo 5
Apresenta-se aqui uma tradução do Comentário às Sentenças de Pedro Lombardo, de Tomás de Aquino, mais especificamente do Livro II, distinção 1, questão 1, art. 5. Neste texto Tomás...

