Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Russian Movement of the 1960–1980s
View through CrossRef
This article is dedicated to the phenomenon of the Russian movement in the second half of the 20th century — the successors of the political programs of pre‑revolutionary conservatives and post‑revolutionary emigrant conservative thinkers that emerged in the 1960s in the USSR. In this sense, the Russian movement, mainly consisting of dissidents and having an anti‑communist orientation, is contrasted with the so‑called legal Russian party, which attempted to connect the values of pre‑revolutionary Russia with the Soviet period and see it as an organic continuation and embodiment of the former. The history and activities of the All‑Russian Society of Cultural and Historical Heritage and its members I. V. Ogurtsov, V. N. Osipov, and their self‑published journal “Veche”, as well as A.I. Solzhenitsyn and I. R. Shafarevich, are examined. The ideology of the All‑Russian Society of Cultural and Historical Heritage is analyzed, including its attitude towards revolution, economic positions, critique of Marxism‑Leninism, foundations of the desired Christian‑social corporative system, and program of Christianizing society. The key milestones in the history of the journal “Veche” and the almanac “Moscow Collection” are presented. The role of priest Dmitry Dudko in the development of the Russian movement is reviewed. Special attention in the article is given to A.I. Solzhenitsyn, whom the author considers the most influential and key figure in the Russian conservative movement of the second half of the 20th century. The ideological content of the collection “From Under the Rubble” is examined, with Solzhenitsyn and Shafarevich being the central authors. The author concludes that the organizational destruction of the Russian movement in the Soviet Union in the late 1970s and early 1980s predetermined the course of Russian history, paving the way for liberal‑Western forces preparing for the restructuring and radical reforms of the 1990s. As a result, during the critical period for the country from 1987 to 1993, the Russian movement did not produce any universally recognized leaders who could offer an alternative to the liberal course of the country. Nevertheless, the intellectual developments of the Russian movement in subsequent decades have been in demand within the conservative political camp and continue to be so to this day.
Title: The Russian Movement of the 1960–1980s
Description:
This article is dedicated to the phenomenon of the Russian movement in the second half of the 20th century — the successors of the political programs of pre‑revolutionary conservatives and post‑revolutionary emigrant conservative thinkers that emerged in the 1960s in the USSR.
In this sense, the Russian movement, mainly consisting of dissidents and having an anti‑communist orientation, is contrasted with the so‑called legal Russian party, which attempted to connect the values of pre‑revolutionary Russia with the Soviet period and see it as an organic continuation and embodiment of the former.
The history and activities of the All‑Russian Society of Cultural and Historical Heritage and its members I.
V.
Ogurtsov, V.
N.
Osipov, and their self‑published journal “Veche”, as well as A.
I.
Solzhenitsyn and I.
R.
Shafarevich, are examined.
The ideology of the All‑Russian Society of Cultural and Historical Heritage is analyzed, including its attitude towards revolution, economic positions, critique of Marxism‑Leninism, foundations of the desired Christian‑social corporative system, and program of Christianizing society.
The key milestones in the history of the journal “Veche” and the almanac “Moscow Collection” are presented.
The role of priest Dmitry Dudko in the development of the Russian movement is reviewed.
Special attention in the article is given to A.
I.
Solzhenitsyn, whom the author considers the most influential and key figure in the Russian conservative movement of the second half of the 20th century.
The ideological content of the collection “From Under the Rubble” is examined, with Solzhenitsyn and Shafarevich being the central authors.
The author concludes that the organizational destruction of the Russian movement in the Soviet Union in the late 1970s and early 1980s predetermined the course of Russian history, paving the way for liberal‑Western forces preparing for the restructuring and radical reforms of the 1990s.
As a result, during the critical period for the country from 1987 to 1993, the Russian movement did not produce any universally recognized leaders who could offer an alternative to the liberal course of the country.
Nevertheless, the intellectual developments of the Russian movement in subsequent decades have been in demand within the conservative political camp and continue to be so to this day.
Related Results
The Power of the Wave: Activism Rainbow Region-Style
The Power of the Wave: Activism Rainbow Region-Style
Introduction The counterculture that arose during the 1960s and 1970s left lasting social and political reverberations in developed nations. This was a time of increasing affluenc...
Bivariate change point detection in direction and speed of cell organelle movement
Bivariate change point detection in direction and speed of cell organelle movement
In this dissertation a new model for the description of cell organelle movement is defined and a test and change point detection algorithm for changes in the model parameters is pr...
Kuban State University: Russian Philology on the 45th Parallel
Kuban State University: Russian Philology on the 45th Parallel
The article represents the history and modernity of philological scholarship in Kuban State University, the oldest university of classical education in the south of Russia, which h...
How Chinese educators can enhance teaching Russian as a foreign language: an analysis of classroom instruction differences in higher education institutions of China and Russia
How Chinese educators can enhance teaching Russian as a foreign language: an analysis of classroom instruction differences in higher education institutions of China and Russia
Importance. Currently, there are distinct differences in the teaching of Russian as a foreign language between China and Russia in areas such as: a) the learning environment organi...
Russian Studies in Contemporary Korea
Russian Studies in Contemporary Korea
The Russian Language Department of Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (HUFS) —one of the leading universities of the Republic of Korea— was founded in the same year with the Univ...
The Image of Russia in Beat Culture
The Image of Russia in Beat Culture
The article deals with one of the most important unofficial imperial symbols of Russia - the Russian bayonet. For quite a long historical period, 1790-1945, the bayonet remained a ...
History of relations between the Russian Imperial Consulate in Jerusalem and the Russian Ecclesiastical Mission in Jerusalem
History of relations between the Russian Imperial Consulate in Jerusalem and the Russian Ecclesiastical Mission in Jerusalem
Importance.
The Holy Land, centered in Jerusalem, has always been for Russia not only one of the most important spiritual centers, but also an object of foreign...
Russian Identity in Regional Diversity: The Role of Trust
Russian Identity in Regional Diversity: The Role of Trust
The article presents the results of a study of the dynamics of Russian identity and the level of generalised trust in Russia and Russian regions. The empirical basis for the study ...

