Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Heterogeneous Differential Privacy

View through CrossRef
The massive collection of personal data by personalization systems has rendered the preservation of privacy of individuals more and more difficult. Most of the proposed approaches to preserve privacy in personalization systems usually address this issue uniformly across users, thus ignoring the fact that users have different privacy attitudes and expectations (even among their own personal data). In this paper, we propose to account for this non-uniformity of privacy expectations by introducing the concept of heterogeneous differential privacy. This notion captures both the variation of privacy expectations among users as well as across different pieces of information related to the same user. We also describe an explicit mechanism achieving heterogeneous differential privacy,  which is a modification of the Laplacian mechanism by Dwork, McSherry, Nissim and Smith. In a nutshell, this mechanism achieves heterogeneous differential privacy by manipulating the sensitivity of the function using a linear transformation on the input domain. Finally, we evaluate on real datasets the impact of the proposed  mechanism with respect to a semantic clustering task. The results of our experiments demonstrate that heterogeneous differential privacy can account for different privacy attitudes while sustaining a good level of utility as measured by the recall for the semantic clustering task.
Title: Heterogeneous Differential Privacy
Description:
The massive collection of personal data by personalization systems has rendered the preservation of privacy of individuals more and more difficult.
Most of the proposed approaches to preserve privacy in personalization systems usually address this issue uniformly across users, thus ignoring the fact that users have different privacy attitudes and expectations (even among their own personal data).
In this paper, we propose to account for this non-uniformity of privacy expectations by introducing the concept of heterogeneous differential privacy.
This notion captures both the variation of privacy expectations among users as well as across different pieces of information related to the same user.
We also describe an explicit mechanism achieving heterogeneous differential privacy,  which is a modification of the Laplacian mechanism by Dwork, McSherry, Nissim and Smith.
In a nutshell, this mechanism achieves heterogeneous differential privacy by manipulating the sensitivity of the function using a linear transformation on the input domain.
Finally, we evaluate on real datasets the impact of the proposed  mechanism with respect to a semantic clustering task.
The results of our experiments demonstrate that heterogeneous differential privacy can account for different privacy attitudes while sustaining a good level of utility as measured by the recall for the semantic clustering task.

Related Results

Augmented Differential Privacy Framework for Data Analytics
Augmented Differential Privacy Framework for Data Analytics
Abstract Differential privacy has emerged as a popular privacy framework for providing privacy preserving noisy query answers based on statistical properties of databases. ...
Privacy and Security for Digital Health: Assessing Risks and Harms to Users
Privacy and Security for Digital Health: Assessing Risks and Harms to Users
Electronic Health (e-Health), such as mobile health (mHealth) and Health Information Systems (HIS), benefits healthcare consumers and professionals. However, it also poses potentia...
Privacy Risk in Recommender Systems
Privacy Risk in Recommender Systems
Nowadays, recommender systems are mostly used in many online applications to filter information and help users in selecting their relevant requirements. It avoids users to become o...
Differential privacy learned index
Differential privacy learned index
Indexes are fundamental components of database management systems, traditionally implemented through structures like B-Tree, Hash, and BitMap indexes. These index structures map ke...
THE SECURITY AND PRIVACY MEASURING SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNET OF THINGS DEVICES
THE SECURITY AND PRIVACY MEASURING SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNET OF THINGS DEVICES
The purpose of the article: elimination of the gap in existing need in the set of clear and objective security and privacy metrics for the IoT devices users and manufacturers and a...
Privacy Threats and Privacy Preservation in Multiple Data Releases of High-Dimensional Datasets
Privacy Threats and Privacy Preservation in Multiple Data Releases of High-Dimensional Datasets
A major challenge is when datasets are released to be utilized in the outside scope of data-collecting organizations, it is how to balance data utilities and data privacy. To achie...
Factors Affecting Students’ Privacy Paradox and Privacy Protection Behavior
Factors Affecting Students’ Privacy Paradox and Privacy Protection Behavior
AbstractIn this exploratory study, we investigate the factors affecting two opposite types of online privacy behavior: 1) online privacy paradox, i.e. a mismatch between users’ onl...

Back to Top