Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

GPT-agents based on medical guidelines can improve the responsiveness and explainability of outcomes for traumatic brain injury rehabilitation

View through CrossRef
AbstractThis study explored the application of generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) agents based on medical guidelines using large language model (LLM) technology for traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation-related questions. To assess the effectiveness of multiple agents (GPT-agents) created using GPT-4, a comparison was conducted using direct GPT-4 as the control group (GPT-4). The GPT-agents comprised multiple agents with distinct functions, including “Medical Guideline Classification”, “Question Retrieval”, “Matching Evaluation”, “Intelligent Question Answering (QA)”, and “Results Evaluation and Source Citation”. Brain rehabilitation questions were selected from the doctor-patient Q&A database for assessment. The primary endpoint was a better answer. The secondary endpoints were accuracy, completeness, explainability, and empathy. Thirty questions were answered; overall GPT-agents took substantially longer and more words to respond than GPT-4 (time: 54.05 vs. 9.66 s, words: 371 vs. 57). However, GPT-agents provided superior answers in more cases compared to GPT-4 (66.7 vs. 33.3%). GPT-Agents surpassed GPT-4 in accuracy evaluation (3.8 ± 1.02 vs. 3.2 ± 0.96, p = 0.0234). No difference in incomplete answers was found (2 ± 0.87 vs. 1.7 ± 0.79, p = 0.213). However, in terms of explainability (2.79 ± 0.45 vs. 07 ± 0.52, p < 0.001) and empathy (2.63 ± 0.57 vs. 1.08 ± 0.51, p < 0.001) evaluation, the GPT-agents performed notably better. Based on medical guidelines, GPT-agents enhanced the accuracy and empathy of responses to TBI rehabilitation questions. This study provides guideline references and demonstrates improved clinical explainability. However, further validation through multicenter trials in a clinical setting is necessary. This study offers practical insights and establishes groundwork for the potential theoretical integration of LLM-agents medicine.
Title: GPT-agents based on medical guidelines can improve the responsiveness and explainability of outcomes for traumatic brain injury rehabilitation
Description:
AbstractThis study explored the application of generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) agents based on medical guidelines using large language model (LLM) technology for traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation-related questions.
To assess the effectiveness of multiple agents (GPT-agents) created using GPT-4, a comparison was conducted using direct GPT-4 as the control group (GPT-4).
The GPT-agents comprised multiple agents with distinct functions, including “Medical Guideline Classification”, “Question Retrieval”, “Matching Evaluation”, “Intelligent Question Answering (QA)”, and “Results Evaluation and Source Citation”.
Brain rehabilitation questions were selected from the doctor-patient Q&A database for assessment.
The primary endpoint was a better answer.
The secondary endpoints were accuracy, completeness, explainability, and empathy.
Thirty questions were answered; overall GPT-agents took substantially longer and more words to respond than GPT-4 (time: 54.
05 vs.
9.
66 s, words: 371 vs.
57).
However, GPT-agents provided superior answers in more cases compared to GPT-4 (66.
7 vs.
33.
3%).
GPT-Agents surpassed GPT-4 in accuracy evaluation (3.
8 ± 1.
02 vs.
3.
2 ± 0.
96, p = 0.
0234).
No difference in incomplete answers was found (2 ± 0.
87 vs.
1.
7 ± 0.
79, p = 0.
213).
However, in terms of explainability (2.
79 ± 0.
45 vs.
07 ± 0.
52, p < 0.
001) and empathy (2.
63 ± 0.
57 vs.
1.
08 ± 0.
51, p < 0.
001) evaluation, the GPT-agents performed notably better.
Based on medical guidelines, GPT-agents enhanced the accuracy and empathy of responses to TBI rehabilitation questions.
This study provides guideline references and demonstrates improved clinical explainability.
However, further validation through multicenter trials in a clinical setting is necessary.
This study offers practical insights and establishes groundwork for the potential theoretical integration of LLM-agents medicine.

Related Results

Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Photo by Maxim Berg on Unsplash INTRODUCTION The brain is one of the most foundational parts of being human, and we are still learning about what makes humans unique. Advancements ...
Performance of Novel GPT-4 in Otolaryngology Knowledge Assessment
Performance of Novel GPT-4 in Otolaryngology Knowledge Assessment
Abstract Purpose GPT-4, recently released by OpenAI, improves upon GPT-3.5 with increased reliability and expanded capabilities, including user-spec...
Brain volume abnormalities and clinical outcomes following paediatric traumatic brain injury
Brain volume abnormalities and clinical outcomes following paediatric traumatic brain injury
Abstract Long-term outcomes are difficult to predict after paediatric traumatic brain injury. The presence or absence of focal brain injuries often do not explain co...
[RETRACTED] Gro-X Brain Reviews - Is Gro-X Brain A Scam? v1
[RETRACTED] Gro-X Brain Reviews - Is Gro-X Brain A Scam? v1
[RETRACTED]➢Item Name - Gro-X Brain➢ Creation - Natural Organic Compound➢ Incidental Effects - NA➢ Accessibility - Online➢ Rating - ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐➢ Click Here To Visit - Official Website - ...
Analisis Penggunaan GPT dalam Pembelajaran Klinik Optik I di ARO Gapopin
Analisis Penggunaan GPT dalam Pembelajaran Klinik Optik I di ARO Gapopin
Perkembangan teknologi kecerdasan buatan (Artificial Intelligence/AI), khususnya model bahasa besar seperti Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT), telah membawa transformasi bes...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...

Back to Top