Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic treatment for duodenal variceal bleeding: a systematic review
View through CrossRef
Duodenal varix is a rare condition that involves massive bleeding, diagnostic difficulties, and a high rate of rebleeding and mortality. The purpose of this study was to systematically review endoscopic treatment for duodenal variceal bleeding to evaluate its effectiveness and safety. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to 21 November 2019. Ninety-two studies containing 156 patients were finally included, and individual data from 101 patients (mean age: 52.67 ± 13.82 years, male: 64.4%) were collected and further analyzed. We used an analysis of variance and χ
2 or Fisher’s exact tests to analyze individual data from 101 patients. The cause of duodenal variceal bleeding was cirrhosis-related intrahepatic portal hypertension (IPH) in 76.2% of patients. The overall rates of initial hemostasis and treatment success of endoscopic treatment for duodenal variceal bleeding were 89.1 and 81.2%, respectively. The median duration of follow-up was 4.5 (1.0, 12.0) months. The overall rates of rebleeding and mortality were 8.9 and 13.9%, respectively. Among a variety of endoscopic treatments available, only the initial hemostasis rate was significantly different between the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and endoscopic tissue adhesive (ETA) groups (72.7 vs. 94.7%, P = 0.023); differences in treatment success, rebleeding, mortality, and adverse events were not statistically significant among the four groups. Endoscopic intervention is a feasible, well tolerated, and effective modality for the treatment of duodenal variceal bleeding. Among the variety of endoscopic treatments available, ETA with cyanoacrylate may be preferable for duodenal variceal bleeding.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic treatment for duodenal variceal bleeding: a systematic review
Description:
Duodenal varix is a rare condition that involves massive bleeding, diagnostic difficulties, and a high rate of rebleeding and mortality.
The purpose of this study was to systematically review endoscopic treatment for duodenal variceal bleeding to evaluate its effectiveness and safety.
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to 21 November 2019.
Ninety-two studies containing 156 patients were finally included, and individual data from 101 patients (mean age: 52.
67 ± 13.
82 years, male: 64.
4%) were collected and further analyzed.
We used an analysis of variance and χ
2 or Fisher’s exact tests to analyze individual data from 101 patients.
The cause of duodenal variceal bleeding was cirrhosis-related intrahepatic portal hypertension (IPH) in 76.
2% of patients.
The overall rates of initial hemostasis and treatment success of endoscopic treatment for duodenal variceal bleeding were 89.
1 and 81.
2%, respectively.
The median duration of follow-up was 4.
5 (1.
0, 12.
0) months.
The overall rates of rebleeding and mortality were 8.
9 and 13.
9%, respectively.
Among a variety of endoscopic treatments available, only the initial hemostasis rate was significantly different between the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and endoscopic tissue adhesive (ETA) groups (72.
7 vs.
94.
7%, P = 0.
023); differences in treatment success, rebleeding, mortality, and adverse events were not statistically significant among the four groups.
Endoscopic intervention is a feasible, well tolerated, and effective modality for the treatment of duodenal variceal bleeding.
Among the variety of endoscopic treatments available, ETA with cyanoacrylate may be preferable for duodenal variceal bleeding.
Related Results
Association of Anticoagulant Therapy with Bleeding in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Case-Cross over Study Using the National Veterans Health Administration Database
Association of Anticoagulant Therapy with Bleeding in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Case-Cross over Study Using the National Veterans Health Administration Database
Background:
Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) are at a higher risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) i.e., deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism {Amb...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
PREDICTORS OF RE-BLEEDING AFTER OESOPHAGEAL VARICEAL BANDING IN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS AT 4 WEEKS
PREDICTORS OF RE-BLEEDING AFTER OESOPHAGEAL VARICEAL BANDING IN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS AT 4 WEEKS
Background: Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a serious complication in cirrhotic patients. Without recommended management, recurrent bleeding happens in 30-40% within the n...
Bleeding Risk Factors in Thrombocytopenic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies
Bleeding Risk Factors in Thrombocytopenic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies
Introduction
Despite prophylactic platelet transfusions, World Health Organization (WHO) grade ≥ 2 bleeding occurs in 50 to 70% of patients with hematologic malignan...
ETIOLOGY OF GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING IN CHILDREN
ETIOLOGY OF GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING IN CHILDREN
Objectives. Identification of clinical, endoscopic, etiological characteristic of children diagnosed with upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Material and methods. It was co...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Early TIPS versus endoscopic therapy for secondary prophylaxis after management of acute esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
Early TIPS versus endoscopic therapy for secondary prophylaxis after management of acute esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
AbstractBackground and aimsAmerican College of Gastroenterology and American Association for the Study of Liver Disease guidelines recommend endoscopic and pharmacologic treatment ...

