Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Associated Factors in the Population of the Eye Cohort Study in Southeast Iran

View through CrossRef
Objectives: The study aims to determine the age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of refractive errors and its related factors among the adult population of southeastern Iran. Methods: The current study included 9280 individuals aged 35 to 70 years using a multistage random sample method from October 2015 to January 2019 as a part of a Persian cohort study in Zahedan. Uncorrected and corrected vision, objective noncycloplegic, and subjective refraction were measured, with all participants undergoing ophthalmoscopy, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundoscopy, refraction, and retinoscopy. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 statistic software and described as percentage, odds ratio, and 95% confidence interval. Comparisons between groups and relationships among risk factors and refractive errors were performed with chi-square, nominal, and multiple regression analysis. Results: The prevalence of low and moderate myopia, high myopia, low and moderate hyperopia, high hyperopia, low and moderate astigmatism, and high astigmatism was 24.2 (95% CI: 22.40 - 25.90), 1.5(95% CI: 0.00 - 3.53), 16.1(95% CI: 14.20 - 17.90), 1.3(95% CI: 0.00 - 3.30), 35.6 (95% CI: 33.90 - 37.30), and 3.8 (95% CI: 1.80 - 5.70) percent, respectively. The prevalence of refractive errors significantly varied across different age groups overall and by sex (P = 0.01). The proportion of refractive errors also significantly differed by education (P = < 0.001). The prevalence of against the rule, with the rule, and oblique astigmatism was 32.8 % (95% CI: 31.10 - 34.20), 42.1% (40.50 - 43.60), and 24.9% (23.10 - 26.60), respectively. The risk of astigmatism was significantly lower in men than in women (OR = 0.75; 95 % CI: 0.60 - 0.90). Based on multiple regression, the risk of myopia (OR = 2.07; 95 % CI: 1.60 - 2.60) and hyperopia (OR = 25.38; 95 % CI: 18.70 - 34.3) was higher in the age group 65 to 75 years compared to the younger group. Conclusions: The present study provided valuable information on the prevalence of refractive errors in the adult population in south-eastern Iran. The findings underscore the need for comprehensive eye care services, particularly for older individuals and those with lower education levels. Further prospective research is warranted to explore the factors contributing to refractive errors and to develop effective strategies for its prevention and management.
Title: Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Associated Factors in the Population of the Eye Cohort Study in Southeast Iran
Description:
Objectives: The study aims to determine the age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of refractive errors and its related factors among the adult population of southeastern Iran.
Methods: The current study included 9280 individuals aged 35 to 70 years using a multistage random sample method from October 2015 to January 2019 as a part of a Persian cohort study in Zahedan.
Uncorrected and corrected vision, objective noncycloplegic, and subjective refraction were measured, with all participants undergoing ophthalmoscopy, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundoscopy, refraction, and retinoscopy.
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.
0 statistic software and described as percentage, odds ratio, and 95% confidence interval.
Comparisons between groups and relationships among risk factors and refractive errors were performed with chi-square, nominal, and multiple regression analysis.
Results: The prevalence of low and moderate myopia, high myopia, low and moderate hyperopia, high hyperopia, low and moderate astigmatism, and high astigmatism was 24.
2 (95% CI: 22.
40 - 25.
90), 1.
5(95% CI: 0.
00 - 3.
53), 16.
1(95% CI: 14.
20 - 17.
90), 1.
3(95% CI: 0.
00 - 3.
30), 35.
6 (95% CI: 33.
90 - 37.
30), and 3.
8 (95% CI: 1.
80 - 5.
70) percent, respectively.
The prevalence of refractive errors significantly varied across different age groups overall and by sex (P = 0.
01).
The proportion of refractive errors also significantly differed by education (P = < 0.
001).
The prevalence of against the rule, with the rule, and oblique astigmatism was 32.
8 % (95% CI: 31.
10 - 34.
20), 42.
1% (40.
50 - 43.
60), and 24.
9% (23.
10 - 26.
60), respectively.
The risk of astigmatism was significantly lower in men than in women (OR = 0.
75; 95 % CI: 0.
60 - 0.
90).
Based on multiple regression, the risk of myopia (OR = 2.
07; 95 % CI: 1.
60 - 2.
60) and hyperopia (OR = 25.
38; 95 % CI: 18.
70 - 34.
3) was higher in the age group 65 to 75 years compared to the younger group.
Conclusions: The present study provided valuable information on the prevalence of refractive errors in the adult population in south-eastern Iran.
The findings underscore the need for comprehensive eye care services, particularly for older individuals and those with lower education levels.
Further prospective research is warranted to explore the factors contributing to refractive errors and to develop effective strategies for its prevention and management.

Related Results

NICU Medication Errors: Describing the Cause and Nature of Medication Errors in a NICU in Qatar
NICU Medication Errors: Describing the Cause and Nature of Medication Errors in a NICU in Qatar
IntroductionA medication error can be defined as “any error occurring in the medication use process” and focuses on problems with the delivery of medication to a patient [1]. Medic...
Prevalence of First Birth Order with Myopia Among KPK Population
Prevalence of First Birth Order with Myopia Among KPK Population
Objective: To find out the prevalence of myopia and hyperopia among the population of KPK. Study Designed: Cross-sectional analytical study. Place and duration of Study: OPD of ter...
IMPACT OF REFRACTIVE CORRECTION ON VISUAL FATIGUE, EYE MOVEMENT AND READING SPEED IN ADULTS
IMPACT OF REFRACTIVE CORRECTION ON VISUAL FATIGUE, EYE MOVEMENT AND READING SPEED IN ADULTS
Background Refractive errors are a leading cause of visual impairment, significantly affecting daily activities that require sustained attention, such as reading. Uncorrected refra...
Current Perspectives on Cystic Echinococcosis: A Systematic Review
Current Perspectives on Cystic Echinococcosis: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Hydatidosis, a zoonotic disease caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus, is a significant public health concern with notable economic impact. I...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Refracting The Diseased Eye
Refracting The Diseased Eye
Refractive error refers to ocular refractive status where images of objects of regard do not fall on the retina in a relaxed eye - the ametropic eye. Thus, objects are perceived as...
Association of Different Type of Refractive Errors with Parental Cousin Marriages
Association of Different Type of Refractive Errors with Parental Cousin Marriages
Refractive errors are the major reason of visual impairment and its prevalence has increased over time. Refractive errors affect ocular structures as corneal shape, eye’s axial len...
Refractive Errors and their Effect on Academic Performance: A Public Health Perspective in University Students
Refractive Errors and their Effect on Academic Performance: A Public Health Perspective in University Students
Abstract Background Refractive errors such as myopia, hypermetropia, and astigmatism are common vision issues that can lead to blurred vision and affect quality of life and...

Back to Top