Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The abdominal drawing-in manoeuvre for detecting activity in the deep abdominal muscles: is this clinical tool reliable and valid?

View through CrossRef
ObjectiveThe abdominal drawing-in manoeuvre (ADIM) is a common clinical tool for manually assessing whether a preferential activation of the deep abdominal muscles in patients with low back pain (LBP) is ‘correct’ or not. The validity and reliability of manual assessment of the ADIM are, however, as yet unknown. This study evaluated the concurrent and discriminative validity and reliability of the manually assessed ADIM.DesignSingle-blinded cross-sectional study.SettingsGeneral population in Stockholm County, Sweden.ParticipantsThe study sample comprised 38 participants seeking care for LBP, and 15 healthy subjects.MeasuresThe manual ADIM was assessed as correct or not following a standard procedure. Ultrasound imaging (USI) was used as the concurrent reference (gold standard) for the manually assessed ADIM by calculating a ratio of the change in muscle thickness between the resting and the contracted states: the correlation between manual test and USI was calculated. Discriminative validity was analysed by calculating sensitivity and specificity. A sample of 24 participants was analysed with κ coefficients for interobserver reliability between two raters.ResultsThe concurrent validity between the manual ADIM and the ADIM–USI ratios showed poor correlations (r=0.13–0.40). The discriminative validity of the manually assessed ADIM to predict LBP showed a sensitivity/specificity of 0.30/0.73, while the ADIM–USI ratio to predict LBP showed 0.19/0.87. The interobserver reliability for the manually assessed ADIM revealed substantial agreement: K=0.71, CI (95%) 0.41 to 1.00.ConclusionsAlthough the interobserver reliability of the manually assessed ADIM was high, the concurrent and discriminative validity were both low for examining the preferential activity of the deep abdominal muscles. Neither the manually assessed ADIM nor the ultrasound testing discriminated between participants with LBP and healthy subjects regarding preferential activity of the transversus muscle as this ability/inability was also present in healthy subjects.
Title: The abdominal drawing-in manoeuvre for detecting activity in the deep abdominal muscles: is this clinical tool reliable and valid?
Description:
ObjectiveThe abdominal drawing-in manoeuvre (ADIM) is a common clinical tool for manually assessing whether a preferential activation of the deep abdominal muscles in patients with low back pain (LBP) is ‘correct’ or not.
The validity and reliability of manual assessment of the ADIM are, however, as yet unknown.
This study evaluated the concurrent and discriminative validity and reliability of the manually assessed ADIM.
DesignSingle-blinded cross-sectional study.
SettingsGeneral population in Stockholm County, Sweden.
ParticipantsThe study sample comprised 38 participants seeking care for LBP, and 15 healthy subjects.
MeasuresThe manual ADIM was assessed as correct or not following a standard procedure.
Ultrasound imaging (USI) was used as the concurrent reference (gold standard) for the manually assessed ADIM by calculating a ratio of the change in muscle thickness between the resting and the contracted states: the correlation between manual test and USI was calculated.
Discriminative validity was analysed by calculating sensitivity and specificity.
A sample of 24 participants was analysed with κ coefficients for interobserver reliability between two raters.
ResultsThe concurrent validity between the manual ADIM and the ADIM–USI ratios showed poor correlations (r=0.
13–0.
40).
The discriminative validity of the manually assessed ADIM to predict LBP showed a sensitivity/specificity of 0.
30/0.
73, while the ADIM–USI ratio to predict LBP showed 0.
19/0.
87.
The interobserver reliability for the manually assessed ADIM revealed substantial agreement: K=0.
71, CI (95%) 0.
41 to 1.
00.
ConclusionsAlthough the interobserver reliability of the manually assessed ADIM was high, the concurrent and discriminative validity were both low for examining the preferential activity of the deep abdominal muscles.
Neither the manually assessed ADIM nor the ultrasound testing discriminated between participants with LBP and healthy subjects regarding preferential activity of the transversus muscle as this ability/inability was also present in healthy subjects.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Smart manufacturing has been developed since the introduction of Industry 4.0. It consists of resource sharing and networking, predictive engineering, and material and data analyti...
Study of facial muscles function after the chin treatment with hyaluronic acid filler
Study of facial muscles function after the chin treatment with hyaluronic acid filler
A single-blind randomized prospective cohort study was conducted with an assessment of efficacy and safety according to the clinical parameters, ultrasound control and electromyogr...
Respiratory muscle perfusion in ponies during prolonged submaximal exercise in thermoneutral environment
Respiratory muscle perfusion in ponies during prolonged submaximal exercise in thermoneutral environment
Summary Distribution of blood flow among various respiratory muscles was examined in 8 healthy ponies during submaximal exercise lasting 30 minutes, using radionuclide labeled 15-μ...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Renal Ewing Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Renal Ewing Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Primary renal Ewing sarcoma is an extremely rare and aggressive tumor, representing less than 1% of all renal tumors. This case report contributes valuable in...
From Manoeuvre Assistance to Manoeuvre Automation
From Manoeuvre Assistance to Manoeuvre Automation
Abstract One of the greatest challenges in shipping automation is the automatic manoeuvring in areas with high safety standards which are executed today exclusively ...

Back to Top