Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A single-center experience of using milk scintigraphy in 251 pediatric patients: A retrospective study
View through CrossRef
To report our experience with milk gastroesophageal scintigraphy and the management of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in children. In 251 pediatric patients we recorded age, underlying disease, central nervous system (CNS) disorders, and GER management. GER management was classified based on treatment plans: grade 0, non-pharmacological treatment; grade 1, non-pharmacological but using a nasogastric tube; grade 2, pharmacological treatment; grade 3, transpyloric feeding; and grade 4, Nissen fundoplication surgery. Patients were included in classified groups with (grades 2, 3, and 4) and without (grades 0 and 1) GER treatment. We evaluated the GER height (classified based on the height of GER, grade 0; no GER, 1; GER in the lower esophagus, 2; GER in the upper esophagus), GER duration in the lower and upper esophagus, presence or absence of massive GER amounts in the lower and upper esophagus, and gastric emptying time. We compared milk scintigraphy results and patient characteristics between groups with (grades 2, 3, and 4) and without (grades 0 and 1) GER treatment. We treated 121 patients for GER. CNS disorders (presence/absence: 46/74 with vs 21/110 without treatment, P < .001). The GER height grade (1.7 ± 0.5 [range, 0–2] with vs 1.5 ± 0.7 [range, 0–2] without treatment, P = .002), massive GER amount (present/absent: 21/99 with vs 9/122 without treatment, P = .011), and duration of GER (seconds) (324.5 ± 508.3 [range, 0–1800] vs 125.0 ± 291.9 [range, 0–1750], P < .001) in the upper esophageal half differed significantly. Similarly massive GER amount (present/absent: 54/66 with vs 34/97 without treatment, P = .002) and GER duration (621.3 ± 601.0 [range, 0–1800] vs 349.8 ± 452.4 [range, 0–1800], P < .001) in the lower esophageal half differed significantly. Additionally, CNS disorders, age, and massive GER in the upper esophageal half differed significantly among grades 2 and 4 in treated patients (P < .05, P < .001, P < .05, respectively). Milk scintigraphy is useful for deciding whether GER treatment is indicated. However, the treatment plan needs to be decided based on each patient’s condition.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: A single-center experience of using milk scintigraphy in 251 pediatric patients: A retrospective study
Description:
To report our experience with milk gastroesophageal scintigraphy and the management of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in children.
In 251 pediatric patients we recorded age, underlying disease, central nervous system (CNS) disorders, and GER management.
GER management was classified based on treatment plans: grade 0, non-pharmacological treatment; grade 1, non-pharmacological but using a nasogastric tube; grade 2, pharmacological treatment; grade 3, transpyloric feeding; and grade 4, Nissen fundoplication surgery.
Patients were included in classified groups with (grades 2, 3, and 4) and without (grades 0 and 1) GER treatment.
We evaluated the GER height (classified based on the height of GER, grade 0; no GER, 1; GER in the lower esophagus, 2; GER in the upper esophagus), GER duration in the lower and upper esophagus, presence or absence of massive GER amounts in the lower and upper esophagus, and gastric emptying time.
We compared milk scintigraphy results and patient characteristics between groups with (grades 2, 3, and 4) and without (grades 0 and 1) GER treatment.
We treated 121 patients for GER.
CNS disorders (presence/absence: 46/74 with vs 21/110 without treatment, P < .
001).
The GER height grade (1.
7 ± 0.
5 [range, 0–2] with vs 1.
5 ± 0.
7 [range, 0–2] without treatment, P = .
002), massive GER amount (present/absent: 21/99 with vs 9/122 without treatment, P = .
011), and duration of GER (seconds) (324.
5 ± 508.
3 [range, 0–1800] vs 125.
0 ± 291.
9 [range, 0–1750], P < .
001) in the upper esophageal half differed significantly.
Similarly massive GER amount (present/absent: 54/66 with vs 34/97 without treatment, P = .
002) and GER duration (621.
3 ± 601.
0 [range, 0–1800] vs 349.
8 ± 452.
4 [range, 0–1800], P < .
001) in the lower esophageal half differed significantly.
Additionally, CNS disorders, age, and massive GER in the upper esophageal half differed significantly among grades 2 and 4 in treated patients (P < .
05, P < .
001, P < .
05, respectively).
Milk scintigraphy is useful for deciding whether GER treatment is indicated.
However, the treatment plan needs to be decided based on each patient’s condition.
Related Results
A2 milk: a new way to offer a flat white?
A2 milk: a new way to offer a flat white?
This research sought feedback from professional baristas on their views and experiences of A2 milk use in café coffee production. Their views are important because Aotearoa New Zea...
British Food Journal Volume 45 Issue 6 1943
British Food Journal Volume 45 Issue 6 1943
In 1934 the Milk Marketing Board came into being, and with it the “Milk in Schools Scheme.” and all its promises to provide millions of school children with milk “approved” by Coun...
Technological study of Paneer prepared from Cow, Buffalo, mixed and standardized milk
Technological study of Paneer prepared from Cow, Buffalo, mixed and standardized milk
Paneer, an indigenous acid-heat coagulated fresh cheese, holds significant importance in Indian cuisine and the dairy industry as a primary protein source for vegetarian population...
Thyroid Hemiagenesis: A Single-Center Case Series
Thyroid Hemiagenesis: A Single-Center Case Series
Abstract
Introduction: Thyroid hemiagenesis (TH) is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by the complete absence of one thyroid lobe, with or without absence of the isthmus. Its...
Determination of milk quality indicators and first streams depending on the stage of lactation and daily milk yield
Determination of milk quality indicators and first streams depending on the stage of lactation and daily milk yield
The relevance of the study is to solve the problem of cow's milk quality and the influence of factors of lactation stage and daily milk yield on milk parameters, and to establish l...
Sensitization to Human Milk
Sensitization to Human Milk
Schulmeister U, Swoboda I, Quirce S, et al. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38(1):60–68
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY. To analyze the specificity and possible biological relevance of ...
Effect of Suckling Cow's Milk or Milk Replacer on Abomasal Luminal pH in Dairy Calves
Effect of Suckling Cow's Milk or Milk Replacer on Abomasal Luminal pH in Dairy Calves
Abstract
Abomasal ulceration occurs commonly in suckling calves, and the cause for the high prevalence of abomasal ulceration is unknown. We hypothesized that die...
Relationship of milk intake and physical activity to abdominal obesity among adolescents
Relationship of milk intake and physical activity to abdominal obesity among adolescents
Summary
What is already known about this subject
Diet and physical activity (PA) are recognized as important factors to prevent abdominal obesity (AO).
Studies have found an invers...

