Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Using multiple hydrological data sources to reduce uncertainty in soil drainage modeling

View through CrossRef
<p>Soil drainage flux is crucial for determining agrochemical loading and groundwater recharge. Because soil drainage is difficult to measure, it is typically predicted using soil moisture models. However, different soil moisture models have been shown to produce different drainage values although they all respected the same soil measurements well, leading to a non-uniqueness problem. To address this issue, this study used groundwater level, stream flow, and tile drainage measurements along with soil moisture data to constraint soil drainage estimation through a coupled soil and groundwater modeling framework in the Cross River watershed in Prince Edward Island, Canada. A 1D Richards equation model, LEACHM, was developed to predict soil drainage and calibrated using soil moisture data. A 3D watershed-scale MODFLOW model was built and calibrated against groundwater level data. The two models were loosely coupled using the soil drainage predicted by LEACHM as recharge. Forward coupled LEACHM and MODFLOW simulations were performed until simulated daily soil moisture, groundwater level, baseflow, and tile drainage values simultaneously matched the 2011–2014 observed values within prescribed error ranges by fine tuning the hydraulic parameters in coupled models. The coupled models were then verified using 2015–2016 data. The resulting LEACHM simulations matched the soil moisture data with less than 15% error, and MODFLOW simulations matched the groundwater level and base flow data, except for a few short periods when LEACHM overestimated soil drainage under deep snow cover. Although the timing of simulated soil drainage corresponded with the occurrence of tile drainage, the simulated soil drainage was generally higher than the tile drainage, which is considered reasonable because tiles intercept only a portion of the overall soil drainage. This exercise demonstrates that the coupled modeling respected multiple hydrological data sources instead of soil moisture alone, and thus enhanced soil moisture estimation.</p>
Copernicus GmbH
Title: Using multiple hydrological data sources to reduce uncertainty in soil drainage modeling
Description:
<p>Soil drainage flux is crucial for determining agrochemical loading and groundwater recharge.
Because soil drainage is difficult to measure, it is typically predicted using soil moisture models.
However, different soil moisture models have been shown to produce different drainage values although they all respected the same soil measurements well, leading to a non-uniqueness problem.
To address this issue, this study used groundwater level, stream flow, and tile drainage measurements along with soil moisture data to constraint soil drainage estimation through a coupled soil and groundwater modeling framework in the Cross River watershed in Prince Edward Island, Canada.
A 1D Richards equation model, LEACHM, was developed to predict soil drainage and calibrated using soil moisture data.
A 3D watershed-scale MODFLOW model was built and calibrated against groundwater level data.
The two models were loosely coupled using the soil drainage predicted by LEACHM as recharge.
Forward coupled LEACHM and MODFLOW simulations were performed until simulated daily soil moisture, groundwater level, baseflow, and tile drainage values simultaneously matched the 2011–2014 observed values within prescribed error ranges by fine tuning the hydraulic parameters in coupled models.
The coupled models were then verified using 2015–2016 data.
The resulting LEACHM simulations matched the soil moisture data with less than 15% error, and MODFLOW simulations matched the groundwater level and base flow data, except for a few short periods when LEACHM overestimated soil drainage under deep snow cover.
Although the timing of simulated soil drainage corresponded with the occurrence of tile drainage, the simulated soil drainage was generally higher than the tile drainage, which is considered reasonable because tiles intercept only a portion of the overall soil drainage.
This exercise demonstrates that the coupled modeling respected multiple hydrological data sources instead of soil moisture alone, and thus enhanced soil moisture estimation.
</p>.

Related Results

Reserves Uncertainty Calculation Accounting for Parameter Uncertainty
Reserves Uncertainty Calculation Accounting for Parameter Uncertainty
Abstract An important goal of geostatistical modeling is to assess output uncertainty after processing realizations through a transfer function, in particular, to...
Hydrology models DRAINMOD and SWIM applied to large soil lysimeters with artificial drainage
Hydrology models DRAINMOD and SWIM applied to large soil lysimeters with artificial drainage
Two hydrological models, which used different methods to determine the soil water distribution in a soil profile, were evaluated against 4 years of data from large soil lysimeters....
Hydrological model adaptivity to inputs of varied quality 
Hydrological model adaptivity to inputs of varied quality 
<p>Hydrological models serve as useful tools to describe current conditions and to predict future conditions in a catchment. However, the errors from input data inclu...
Analysis of Soil Erodibility Factor for Hydrologic Processes in Kereke Watershed, North Central Nigeria
Analysis of Soil Erodibility Factor for Hydrologic Processes in Kereke Watershed, North Central Nigeria
: Soil erodibility factor plays essential role in determining how susceptible soil is to hydrological processes such as detachment and removal by rainfall and runoff that could inf...
Sampling Space of Uncertainty Through Stochastic Modelling of Geological Facies
Sampling Space of Uncertainty Through Stochastic Modelling of Geological Facies
Abstract The way the space of uncertainty should be sampled from reservoir models is an essential point for discussion that can have a major impact on the assessm...
Eco-hydrological characterisation of live pole drains (LPDs) for slope drainage and stability
Eco-hydrological characterisation of live pole drains (LPDs) for slope drainage and stability
Live pole drain (LPD) is an innovative, plant-based, drainage system designed to drain surface water, regulate the soil water budget, and facilitate ecological succession and lands...
Drainage reorganization disrupts scaling between drainage area and valley width
Drainage reorganization disrupts scaling between drainage area and valley width
Valley width is a fundamental morphologic property of rivers that plays a key role in drainage networks' hydrology, ecology, and geomorphology. In many cases, defining and measurin...
Research progresses and trends of hydrological connectivity based on bibliometrics
Research progresses and trends of hydrological connectivity based on bibliometrics
<p>Water is the main factor restricting and maintaining biological activities, and hydrological connectivity is closely related to many ecological processes. As a pro...

Back to Top