Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Tumor sideness and mutational status: The potential effects on mCRC pts survival and treatment outcomes.

View through CrossRef
682 Background: The treatment of mCRC has been changed with identification of different clinical behaviour of right and left sided tumors. Right-sided primary was associated with high mutational burden, worse prognosis and poor anti-EGFR response. We aimed to investigate the association between tumor site and survival, mutational status and treatment outcome of mCRC pts. Methods: The data of mCRC pts in two-cancer center in South Anatolia were retrospectively analyzed. The effects of tumor sidedness, treatment, braf on survival of mCRC pts were investigated using the log rank test. The Kaplan- Meier survival estimates were calculated. Results: A total of 210 (F/M=128/82) pts were included to study. Median age was 59.5 (range: 23-88) years. Right and left-sided tumour rates were 45 (21.7%) and 153 (72.9%), respectively. Kras, nras and braf mutation rates were 32.9, 5.5 and 6.7 %, respectively. Median follow-up was 27.5 (range: 1.3-274.3) months. In the right-sided tumors, kras (52.5 vs. 33.8 %, p=0.0034) and braf (33.3 vs. 11.1%, p=0.022) mutation rates were more than left-sided ones. Median PFS (15.1 vs. 14.2 months) and OS (27.5 vs. 23.9 months) were higher in the pts with left-sided tumors, the difference was not significant. First line bevacizumab was used in 76 (55%) in left, 15 (36%) in right, anti-EGFR was used in 27 (20%) in left, 11 (25%) in right-sided tumors. According to tumor side, there was no significant survival difference between treatment arms. In the pts with left-sided tumors, median OS was 39.3 months with anti-EGFR, 27.3 months with bevacizumab. Right-sided primary was associated with worse survival. Median OS was similar between braf wild and mutant tumours. Conclusions: Our mutation rates were similar with the literature. Braf mutations were more frequent in right-side tumors. Right-sided primary was associated with poor prognosis. However, the survival difference was not significant. Best survival rates were found with first-line anti-EGFR treatment in the pts with left-sided tumors, but only 20% pts used anti-EGFR at first line in this group. Due to low anti-EGFR usage at first line, survival rates were similar between treatment arms.
Title: Tumor sideness and mutational status: The potential effects on mCRC pts survival and treatment outcomes.
Description:
682 Background: The treatment of mCRC has been changed with identification of different clinical behaviour of right and left sided tumors.
Right-sided primary was associated with high mutational burden, worse prognosis and poor anti-EGFR response.
We aimed to investigate the association between tumor site and survival, mutational status and treatment outcome of mCRC pts.
Methods: The data of mCRC pts in two-cancer center in South Anatolia were retrospectively analyzed.
The effects of tumor sidedness, treatment, braf on survival of mCRC pts were investigated using the log rank test.
The Kaplan- Meier survival estimates were calculated.
Results: A total of 210 (F/M=128/82) pts were included to study.
Median age was 59.
5 (range: 23-88) years.
Right and left-sided tumour rates were 45 (21.
7%) and 153 (72.
9%), respectively.
Kras, nras and braf mutation rates were 32.
9, 5.
5 and 6.
7 %, respectively.
Median follow-up was 27.
5 (range: 1.
3-274.
3) months.
In the right-sided tumors, kras (52.
5 vs.
33.
8 %, p=0.
0034) and braf (33.
3 vs.
11.
1%, p=0.
022) mutation rates were more than left-sided ones.
Median PFS (15.
1 vs.
14.
2 months) and OS (27.
5 vs.
23.
9 months) were higher in the pts with left-sided tumors, the difference was not significant.
First line bevacizumab was used in 76 (55%) in left, 15 (36%) in right, anti-EGFR was used in 27 (20%) in left, 11 (25%) in right-sided tumors.
According to tumor side, there was no significant survival difference between treatment arms.
In the pts with left-sided tumors, median OS was 39.
3 months with anti-EGFR, 27.
3 months with bevacizumab.
Right-sided primary was associated with worse survival.
Median OS was similar between braf wild and mutant tumours.
Conclusions: Our mutation rates were similar with the literature.
Braf mutations were more frequent in right-side tumors.
Right-sided primary was associated with poor prognosis.
However, the survival difference was not significant.
Best survival rates were found with first-line anti-EGFR treatment in the pts with left-sided tumors, but only 20% pts used anti-EGFR at first line in this group.
Due to low anti-EGFR usage at first line, survival rates were similar between treatment arms.

Related Results

High-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) for KRAS mutational study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC pts).
High-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) for KRAS mutational study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC pts).
515 Background: The use of anti EGFR monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab is restricted to KRAS wild-type (WT) mCRC pts. Standard method for KRAS testing is direct sequ...
Dynamics of Mutations in Patients with ET Treated with Imetelstat
Dynamics of Mutations in Patients with ET Treated with Imetelstat
Abstract Background: Imetelstat, a first in class specific telomerase inhibitor, induced hematologic responses in all patients (pts) with essential thrombocythemia (...
Pilot Study with Lenalidomide in Patients with POEMS Syndrome
Pilot Study with Lenalidomide in Patients with POEMS Syndrome
Abstract Abstract 4612 Introduction: POEMS syndrome is a rare multisystemic disease. Vascular endothelial growth ...
Olverembatinib As Second-Line (2L) Therapy in Patients (pts) with Chronic Phase-Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML)
Olverembatinib As Second-Line (2L) Therapy in Patients (pts) with Chronic Phase-Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML)
Introduction Olverembatinib (HQP1351), a third-generation BCR-ABL1 TKI, has demonstrated remarkable efficacy and a favorable safety profile in CML pts resistant a...

Back to Top