Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Internal fixation of the femoral neck carries a risk of perforation due to the presence of the isthmus of the femoral neck. At present, there are few studies on the safe and risk zones of the femoral neck system (FNS) implantation. This study aimed to recommend the safe range of injection of FNS in the lateral wall of the proximal femur, parallel to the axis of the femoral neck, during FNS treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF). Methods Femoral computed tomography (CT) data of 80 patients (male: 40; female: 40) who met the inclusion criteria were collected. Mimics 21.0 software was used to complete the modeling. 3-Matic 13.0 software was used to establish the axis of the femoral neck and its vertical plane, perform the cutting of the femoral neck, and project it on the vertical plane of the femoral neck axis. After matching a rectangle for each projection map, all sample sizes (80 cases) were standardized and superimposed to obtain gradient maps of the safe zone (SZ) and dangerous zone (RZ), thereby securing edge key points and safe FNS insertion range. Results In the 80 samples, the mean diameter of the smallest femoral neck section was 33.87 ± 2.32 mm for men and 29.36 ± 1.92 mm for women. All 80 femoral necks had safe and risky areas. The SZ/S × 100% was 77.59 (± 2.22%), and the RS/S ×100% was 22.39% (± 2.22%). The risk area was composed of four parts: (1), (2), (3), and (4), respectively, corresponding to 3.45 ± 1.74%, 5.51 ± 2.63%, 6.22 ± 1.41%, and 7.22 ± 1.39%. Four marginal key points, perforation risk, and safe ranges (SR) of FNS were analyzed on the lateral wall of the femoral neck. Conclusions The SR of FNS placement was recommended by digital simulation. In addition, Regions (3) and (4) posed a higher risk of penetrating the cortex. Using the gradient map of RZ for preoperative evaluation is recommended to avoid iatrogenic perforation.
Title: Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation
Description:
Abstract Background Internal fixation of the femoral neck carries a risk of perforation due to the presence of the isthmus of the femoral neck.
At present, there are few studies on the safe and risk zones of the femoral neck system (FNS) implantation.
This study aimed to recommend the safe range of injection of FNS in the lateral wall of the proximal femur, parallel to the axis of the femoral neck, during FNS treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF).
Methods Femoral computed tomography (CT) data of 80 patients (male: 40; female: 40) who met the inclusion criteria were collected.
Mimics 21.
0 software was used to complete the modeling.
3-Matic 13.
0 software was used to establish the axis of the femoral neck and its vertical plane, perform the cutting of the femoral neck, and project it on the vertical plane of the femoral neck axis.
After matching a rectangle for each projection map, all sample sizes (80 cases) were standardized and superimposed to obtain gradient maps of the safe zone (SZ) and dangerous zone (RZ), thereby securing edge key points and safe FNS insertion range.
Results In the 80 samples, the mean diameter of the smallest femoral neck section was 33.
87 ± 2.
32 mm for men and 29.
36 ± 1.
92 mm for women.
All 80 femoral necks had safe and risky areas.
The SZ/S × 100% was 77.
59 (± 2.
22%), and the RS/S ×100% was 22.
39% (± 2.
22%).
The risk area was composed of four parts: (1), (2), (3), and (4), respectively, corresponding to 3.
45 ± 1.
74%, 5.
51 ± 2.
63%, 6.
22 ± 1.
41%, and 7.
22 ± 1.
39%.
Four marginal key points, perforation risk, and safe ranges (SR) of FNS were analyzed on the lateral wall of the femoral neck.
Conclusions The SR of FNS placement was recommended by digital simulation.
In addition, Regions (3) and (4) posed a higher risk of penetrating the cortex.
Using the gradient map of RZ for preoperative evaluation is recommended to avoid iatrogenic perforation.

Related Results

Angiographic evaluation of femoral bifurcation in Chinese population
Angiographic evaluation of femoral bifurcation in Chinese population
Objective Common femoral artery (CFA) access has been proved to be safe with lower risk of complications in percutaneous catheterisation. The femoral head can be ...
MONGOLIAN AND HAN NATIONALITY RIGHT FEMORAL ARTERY BIFURCATION ANALYSIS BY ANGIOGRAPHY
MONGOLIAN AND HAN NATIONALITY RIGHT FEMORAL ARTERY BIFURCATION ANALYSIS BY ANGIOGRAPHY
Objectives To analyze the variation of Mongolian and Han nationality in the site of femoral artery bifurcation relying on the femoral head and the pulic symphysis...
What Role Does a Colored Under Glove Have in Detecting Glove Perforation in Foot and Ankle Procedures?
What Role Does a Colored Under Glove Have in Detecting Glove Perforation in Foot and Ankle Procedures?
Abstract Background Many orthopaedic surgical teams practice double gloving or use colored indicator gloving techniques to reduce contamination i...
Risk Factors of Intestinal Perforation Associated with Peritonitis
Risk Factors of Intestinal Perforation Associated with Peritonitis
Perforation is known as an abnormal opening in an empty organ. It is copied from the Latin word perforatus, meaning “to bore through.” In western world the estimated frequency of i...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...

Back to Top