Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Patient-reported outcome measures in congenital heart surgery: a systematic review

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackground:Patient-reported outcome measures are commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments. CHD remains the most common congenital malformation. There has been a gradual shift in evaluating the outcome of surgery for CHD from mortality to morbidity and now to self-reported outcomes.Aims:We aimed to review studies assessing patient-reported outcome measures as a useful marker of outcome for patients, both children and adults, who underwent surgery for CHD.Methods:A systematic database search was conducted of original articles that explored the application of patient-reported outcome measures in the CHD surgical setting in PubMed and SCOPUS from inception to February 2022.Results:Our search yielded 1511 papers, of which six studies were included in this review after screening abstract and full-text, with a total sample size of 5734 patients. The main areas of discussion were the utility of patient-reported outcome measures, determinants of patient-reported outcome measures, and the need for a congenital cardiac surgery-specific patient-reported outcome measure for paediatric patients and their parents/guardians and adult patients.Conclusion:This systematic review reports the use of patient-reported outcome measures to be a useful indicator to gain insight into the patients’ perspective to provide holistic and patient-centred management. However, further studies are required to assess the utility of patient-reported outcome measures in a congenital cardiac surgical setting.
Title: Patient-reported outcome measures in congenital heart surgery: a systematic review
Description:
AbstractBackground:Patient-reported outcome measures are commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments.
CHD remains the most common congenital malformation.
There has been a gradual shift in evaluating the outcome of surgery for CHD from mortality to morbidity and now to self-reported outcomes.
Aims:We aimed to review studies assessing patient-reported outcome measures as a useful marker of outcome for patients, both children and adults, who underwent surgery for CHD.
Methods:A systematic database search was conducted of original articles that explored the application of patient-reported outcome measures in the CHD surgical setting in PubMed and SCOPUS from inception to February 2022.
Results:Our search yielded 1511 papers, of which six studies were included in this review after screening abstract and full-text, with a total sample size of 5734 patients.
The main areas of discussion were the utility of patient-reported outcome measures, determinants of patient-reported outcome measures, and the need for a congenital cardiac surgery-specific patient-reported outcome measure for paediatric patients and their parents/guardians and adult patients.
Conclusion:This systematic review reports the use of patient-reported outcome measures to be a useful indicator to gain insight into the patients’ perspective to provide holistic and patient-centred management.
However, further studies are required to assess the utility of patient-reported outcome measures in a congenital cardiac surgical setting.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
GENETIC PERSPECTIVE OF THE CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE
GENETIC PERSPECTIVE OF THE CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE
Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) are the structural abnormalities that may occur in the heart, greater veins and arteries or may include the septum between the ventricles and atria...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Presentation and Management of Cervical Thoracic Duct Cyst: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Presentation and Management of Cervical Thoracic Duct Cyst: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Abstract Introduction Thoracic duct cysts are an uncommon phenomenon, especially within the cervical region. Due to its limited reported cases, very little is known about its etiol...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction  Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

Back to Top