Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Working Paper Series: Therapeutic Communities in Brazil
View through CrossRef
Spread across Brazil and attaining an unparalleled political force, therapeutic communities are as inescapable in the debate on drug policy as they are complex to define. Although they are not a Brazilian creation, they have been operating in that country for decades, and their dissemination intensified in the 1990s. In 2011, they were officially incorporated into Brazil's Psychosocial Care Network (Rede de Atenção Psicossocial, or RAPS). Since then, therapeutic communities have been at the center of public debates about their regulation; about how they should—or even if they should—be a part of the healthcare system; about the level of supervision to which they should be submitted; about their sources of funding, particularly whether or not they should have access to public funding; and, most importantly, about the quality of the services they offer and the many reports of rights violation that have been made public. However, a well-informed public debate can only flourish if the available information is based on sound evidence. The SSRC’s Drugs, Security and Democracy Program is concerned with the policy relevance of the research projects it supports, and the debate around therapeutic communities in Brazil points to a clear need for impartial research that addresses different cross-cutting aspects of this topic in its various dimensions: legal, regulatory, health, and observance of human rights, among others. It is in this context that we publish this working paper series on therapeutic communities in Brazil. The eight articles that compose this series offer a multidisciplinary view of the topic, expanding and deepening the existing literature and offering powerful contributions to a substantive analysis of therapeutic communities as instruments of public policy. Although they can be read separately, it is as a whole that the strength of the eight articles that make up this series becomes more evident. Even though they offer different perspectives, they are complementary works in—and already essential for—delineating and understanding the phenomenon of therapeutic communities in Brazil.
Drugs, Security and Democracy Program, Social Science Research Council
Title: Working Paper Series: Therapeutic Communities in Brazil
Description:
Spread across Brazil and attaining an unparalleled political force, therapeutic communities are as inescapable in the debate on drug policy as they are complex to define.
Although they are not a Brazilian creation, they have been operating in that country for decades, and their dissemination intensified in the 1990s.
In 2011, they were officially incorporated into Brazil's Psychosocial Care Network (Rede de Atenção Psicossocial, or RAPS).
Since then, therapeutic communities have been at the center of public debates about their regulation; about how they should—or even if they should—be a part of the healthcare system; about the level of supervision to which they should be submitted; about their sources of funding, particularly whether or not they should have access to public funding; and, most importantly, about the quality of the services they offer and the many reports of rights violation that have been made public.
However, a well-informed public debate can only flourish if the available information is based on sound evidence.
The SSRC’s Drugs, Security and Democracy Program is concerned with the policy relevance of the research projects it supports, and the debate around therapeutic communities in Brazil points to a clear need for impartial research that addresses different cross-cutting aspects of this topic in its various dimensions: legal, regulatory, health, and observance of human rights, among others.
It is in this context that we publish this working paper series on therapeutic communities in Brazil.
The eight articles that compose this series offer a multidisciplinary view of the topic, expanding and deepening the existing literature and offering powerful contributions to a substantive analysis of therapeutic communities as instruments of public policy.
Although they can be read separately, it is as a whole that the strength of the eight articles that make up this series becomes more evident.
Even though they offer different perspectives, they are complementary works in—and already essential for—delineating and understanding the phenomenon of therapeutic communities in Brazil.
Related Results
GEOSPATIAL ASPECTS OF FINANCIAL CAPACITY OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF TERNOPIL REGION
GEOSPATIAL ASPECTS OF FINANCIAL CAPACITY OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF TERNOPIL REGION
In the article geospatial aspects of the financial capacity of territorial communities of Ternopil region are described. The need to conduct such a study has been updated, since no...
FUNCTIONAL FEATURES AND TYPOLOGY OF SUBURBAN TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF TERNOPOL
FUNCTIONAL FEATURES AND TYPOLOGY OF SUBURBAN TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF TERNOPOL
Peculiarities of the timing of suburban (in relation to the city of Ternopil) territorial communities are considered. Such parameters as the area of suburban territorial communitie...
Unraveling the assembly mechanisms and differentiated ecological functions of protist cell-associated and free-living bacterial communities during two
Prorocentrum shikokuense
blooms
Unraveling the assembly mechanisms and differentiated ecological functions of protist cell-associated and free-living bacterial communities during two
Prorocentrum shikokuense
blooms
ABSTRACT
Free-living and cell-associated microbial communities are crucial in the development, maintenance, and decline of harmfu...
FUNCTIONAL FEATURES AND TYPOLOGY OF URBAN TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF THE TERNOPIL REGION
FUNCTIONAL FEATURES AND TYPOLOGY OF URBAN TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF THE TERNOPIL REGION
The problems of the development of territorial communities have become particularly relevant at the current stage. Important features of development are the coherence of economic, ...
Joint responsibility as an attitude of mind (working alongside) a letter by David Wills in the PETT archives
Joint responsibility as an attitude of mind (working alongside) a letter by David Wills in the PETT archives
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to present a previously unpublished letter from children’s therapeutic community pioneer David Wills to his younger colleague...
Therapeutic communities and the local community: isolation or integration?
Therapeutic communities and the local community: isolation or integration?
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to test the feasibility of utilising an Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD) model in the context of an Alcohol and Other...
Common Goods in Uncommon Times: Water, Droughts, and the Sustainability of Ancestral Pueblo Communities in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico, AD 1100-1700
Common Goods in Uncommon Times: Water, Droughts, and the Sustainability of Ancestral Pueblo Communities in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico, AD 1100-1700
Adapting our infrastructure and institutions to climate change is a crucial dilemma for modern society. Archaeologists should be well positioned to address this issue with examples...
Soil Enzyme Stoichiometry and Its Influencing Factors in Different Mangrove Communities in Xinying Bay, Hainan
Soil Enzyme Stoichiometry and Its Influencing Factors in Different Mangrove Communities in Xinying Bay, Hainan
To investigate the differences in soil hydrolytic enzyme activity and enzyme stoichiometry among different mangrove communities, as well as the driving factors behind these variati...

