Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Ayesha Siddiqa. Military Inc.: Inside Pakistan’s Military Economy. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2007. 292 pages. Paperback. Rs 450.00

View through CrossRef
The book is about business interests of the military in Pakistan. It looks at the political economy of military’s business activities and the personal economic stakes of military personnel as the driver of political ambitions of the armed forces. The author has coined the term ‘Milbus’ for military’s business activities. She defines ‘Milbus’ as ‘military capital used for the personal benefit of military fraternity’. Apart from the Introduction, the book has ten chapters. Chapter 1, ‘Milbus: A Theoretical Concept’, argues that Milbus prevails in most militaries around the world. The extent to which Milbus prevails in a military depends upon the civil-military relations and the strength of political institutions in the country. The chapter outlines six distinct categories of civil-military relations along a continuum of the strength of civil institutions. Polity’s that boast of strong civil institutions, see political forces rule over the country with military playing a subservient role. As the strength of civil institutions declines, militaries penetrate, with the role military becoming complete when the state fails. This is the state where warlords rule. Chapter 2, ‘The Pakistan Military: The Development of Praetorianism’, argues that certain structural lacunae in Pakistan’s political system, dating back to 1947, brought the military to fore. Governments of the day, having failed to promote socioeconomic development, promoted the national security paradigm, to retain their political legitimacy. This brought the military to the forefront. The ascent of military is owed on the one hand to the weak political leadership, that gave the military an opportunity to assert itself, and on the other hand to the authoritarian inclination of civil governments, that compelled these governments to partner with the military. Thus the seed of praetorianism were sown from the very beginning.
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics
Title: Ayesha Siddiqa. Military Inc.: Inside Pakistan’s Military Economy. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2007. 292 pages. Paperback. Rs 450.00
Description:
The book is about business interests of the military in Pakistan.
It looks at the political economy of military’s business activities and the personal economic stakes of military personnel as the driver of political ambitions of the armed forces.
The author has coined the term ‘Milbus’ for military’s business activities.
She defines ‘Milbus’ as ‘military capital used for the personal benefit of military fraternity’.
Apart from the Introduction, the book has ten chapters.
Chapter 1, ‘Milbus: A Theoretical Concept’, argues that Milbus prevails in most militaries around the world.
The extent to which Milbus prevails in a military depends upon the civil-military relations and the strength of political institutions in the country.
The chapter outlines six distinct categories of civil-military relations along a continuum of the strength of civil institutions.
Polity’s that boast of strong civil institutions, see political forces rule over the country with military playing a subservient role.
As the strength of civil institutions declines, militaries penetrate, with the role military becoming complete when the state fails.
This is the state where warlords rule.
Chapter 2, ‘The Pakistan Military: The Development of Praetorianism’, argues that certain structural lacunae in Pakistan’s political system, dating back to 1947, brought the military to fore.
Governments of the day, having failed to promote socioeconomic development, promoted the national security paradigm, to retain their political legitimacy.
This brought the military to the forefront.
The ascent of military is owed on the one hand to the weak political leadership, that gave the military an opportunity to assert itself, and on the other hand to the authoritarian inclination of civil governments, that compelled these governments to partner with the military.
Thus the seed of praetorianism were sown from the very beginning.

Related Results

Why Do Indians Experience Less Happiness Than Pakistanis?
Why Do Indians Experience Less Happiness Than Pakistanis?
This study explores the enigma of happiness inequality between India and Pakistan, despite India’s economic prowess. Employing inequality regression models, the study pinpoints cru...
Pakistan and Global Economy
Pakistan and Global Economy
The global economy is a complex and interconnected system that encompasses the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services on a worldwide scale. The exchange of...
NEXUS BETWEEN REMITTANCES AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OF PAKISTAN: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
NEXUS BETWEEN REMITTANCES AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OF PAKISTAN: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Purpose: This study is crucial because countries like Pakistan are facing the major problem of insufficient financial capital since they appear on the world map and they have to ta...
(originally published in December 1998)
(originally published in December 1998)
This paper is included in the First Monday Special Issue #3: Internet banking, e-money, and Internet gift economies, published in December 2005. Special Issue editor Mark A. Fox as...
What is Analytic Philosophy
What is Analytic Philosophy
Special Issue: What is Analytic PhilosophyReferencesHaaparantaG. P. Baker and P. M. S. Hacker. Frege: Logical Excavations. Oxford, Blackwell, 1984.M. Dummett. The Interpretation of...
Balancing Trade and Competition in Pakistan
Balancing Trade and Competition in Pakistan
High tariff rates have increased the overall cost of production in Pakistan, and the domestic prices of many products have become much higher than the international market prices. ...
Can Constitutional Change Transform Society?
Can Constitutional Change Transform Society?
This essay reviews the following works:Constitutional Change and Transformation in Latin America. Edited by Richard Albert, Carlos Bernal, and Juliano Zaiden Benvindo. Chicago: Har...

Back to Top