Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Leuprolide and triptorelin treatment in children with idiopathic central precocious puberty: an efficacy/tolerability comparison study
View through CrossRef
IntroductionCentral precocious puberty (CPP) results from premature activation of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, with the consequent increase of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH); GnRH agonists (GnRHa) represent the gold-standard therapy in children with CPP although their use might be responsible for pituitary GnRH receptors down-regulation, that in turn suppresses luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and blocks of gonadal sex hormones release. The most prescribed GnRHa in the clinical practice are leuprolide and triptorelin, whose use is generally safe and well tolerated; however, mild menopausal-like side effects could appear. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the efficacy and tolerability profile of leuprolide and triptorelin in CPP patients.Methods110 girls affected by CPP were enrolled in this retrospective study, carried out from 2018 to 2020. The enrolled patients received leuprolide (n = 48) or triptorelin (n = 62). Efficacy was investigated by the means of clinical parameters and radiological changes and side effects were also recorded to evaluate the possible relationship between the two GnRHa treatments and side effects appearance.ResultsAt baseline triptorelin patients had significantly higher LH and LH peak levels than leuprolide patients, whereas no significant difference in other patient characteristics was observed between the two groups. The leuprolide treatment lasted 971 days [790–1,171 days] while the duration of triptorelin administration was 792 days [760–1,003 days] (p < 0.001). Overall 46 (41.8%) of the studied patients reported mild menopausal-like symptoms: among these 27 were treated with triptorelin and 19 with leuprolide (p = 0.558). Patients treated with triptorelin, or leuprolide showed headache (27.4% vs. 16.7%), mood swings (12.9% vs. 16.7%), increased appetite (12.9% vs. 18.8%) and nausea (1.6% vs. 10.4%) respectively. Moreover, the onset of side effects appearance related to GnRHa therapy significantly reduces with the increase of the initial bone age (p = 0.038).ConclusionLeuprolide and triptorelin treatment appear to be effective and safe without significant difference between the two drugs in term of efficacy and tolerability, making both good options for treating CPP.
Title: Leuprolide and triptorelin treatment in children with idiopathic central precocious puberty: an efficacy/tolerability comparison study
Description:
IntroductionCentral precocious puberty (CPP) results from premature activation of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, with the consequent increase of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH); GnRH agonists (GnRHa) represent the gold-standard therapy in children with CPP although their use might be responsible for pituitary GnRH receptors down-regulation, that in turn suppresses luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and blocks of gonadal sex hormones release.
The most prescribed GnRHa in the clinical practice are leuprolide and triptorelin, whose use is generally safe and well tolerated; however, mild menopausal-like side effects could appear.
The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the efficacy and tolerability profile of leuprolide and triptorelin in CPP patients.
Methods110 girls affected by CPP were enrolled in this retrospective study, carried out from 2018 to 2020.
The enrolled patients received leuprolide (n = 48) or triptorelin (n = 62).
Efficacy was investigated by the means of clinical parameters and radiological changes and side effects were also recorded to evaluate the possible relationship between the two GnRHa treatments and side effects appearance.
ResultsAt baseline triptorelin patients had significantly higher LH and LH peak levels than leuprolide patients, whereas no significant difference in other patient characteristics was observed between the two groups.
The leuprolide treatment lasted 971 days [790–1,171 days] while the duration of triptorelin administration was 792 days [760–1,003 days] (p < 0.
001).
Overall 46 (41.
8%) of the studied patients reported mild menopausal-like symptoms: among these 27 were treated with triptorelin and 19 with leuprolide (p = 0.
558).
Patients treated with triptorelin, or leuprolide showed headache (27.
4% vs.
16.
7%), mood swings (12.
9% vs.
16.
7%), increased appetite (12.
9% vs.
18.
8%) and nausea (1.
6% vs.
10.
4%) respectively.
Moreover, the onset of side effects appearance related to GnRHa therapy significantly reduces with the increase of the initial bone age (p = 0.
038).
ConclusionLeuprolide and triptorelin treatment appear to be effective and safe without significant difference between the two drugs in term of efficacy and tolerability, making both good options for treating CPP.
Related Results
Leuprolide acetate treatment of adrenocortical disease in ferrets
Leuprolide acetate treatment of adrenocortical disease in ferrets
Abstract
Objective—To determine the effects of leuprolide
acetate, a long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone
analog, in ferrets with adrenocortical diseases.
...
Puberty, but not precocious puberty is influenced by weight gain in the first years of life
Puberty, but not precocious puberty is influenced by weight gain in the first years of life
Abstract
Introduction
Factors favouring the secular trend of decreasing average age of puberty include eating habits, environmental endocrine dis...
Time of puberty in females and cognitive performance
Time of puberty in females and cognitive performance
Biological processes associated with puberty have been researched extensively. However, the relationship between time of puberty in females and cognitive performance remains unclea...
The experience of puberty in adolescent boys: an Iranian perspective
The experience of puberty in adolescent boys: an Iranian perspective
Background: The process of puberty is a normal physiological event for adolescents. Studies show that there is not enough knowledge about boys' puberty experiences. In spite of ph...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract
A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Screening for central precocious puberty by single basal Luteinizing Hormone levels
Screening for central precocious puberty by single basal Luteinizing Hormone levels
Abstract
Purpose
To identify cut-off for basal LH levels and for pelvic ultrasound uterine and ovarian parameters indicating an Hypotalamic–Pituitar...
Central Precocious Puberty – Management and Long-term Outcomes
Central Precocious Puberty – Management and Long-term Outcomes
Central precocious puberty (CPP) results from premature re-activation of the gonadotropic axis. CPP is much more common in girls than in boys and is idiopathic in most cases. In bo...
Abnormal Puberty and Amenorrhea: A Review
Abnormal Puberty and Amenorrhea: A Review
Puberty marks the development of secondary sexual characteristics and reproductive capacity, with normal onset ranging from age 8 to 13 years in female children. Precocious puberty...

