Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Physician mergers involve 38% of doctors, substantial health system participation, and frequent serial acquisition

View through CrossRef
Abstract We describe the incidence of mergers between US physician firms. We considered the role of health systems in physician merger activity and the extent to which individual firms engage in multiple acquisitions, or “roll-up” behavior. We used a unique collection of subpoenaed data from 6 insurers in 15 states, which account for approximately 80% of commercially insured members in those states between 2015 and 2020. Over 6 years, we observed 2019 mergers between physician firms that spanned from small single-specialty practices to large groups affiliated with health systems. Approximately 20% of the roughly 15 000 firms were involved in a merger. Of the nearly 400 000 doctors in our sample, 38% were employed by firms involved in a merger, although only 3.8% of the doctors were part of an acquired group. Sixty-three firms made more than 5 acquisitions, and 3 made more than 20 acquisitions. Health care systems, responsible for approximately 40% of mergers, frequently engaged in serial acquisitions. Acquired physician firms are typically small (<10 doctors), and much smaller than the acquiring firm. We document that many physician mergers occurred in 15 states over 5 years. A significant fraction of the physician mergers we identified, especially those involving health systems, exhibited characteristics that could indicate the potential for competitive harm. Our results suggest that researchers should examine the degree to which these competitively suspect mergers have affected competition.
Title: Physician mergers involve 38% of doctors, substantial health system participation, and frequent serial acquisition
Description:
Abstract We describe the incidence of mergers between US physician firms.
We considered the role of health systems in physician merger activity and the extent to which individual firms engage in multiple acquisitions, or “roll-up” behavior.
We used a unique collection of subpoenaed data from 6 insurers in 15 states, which account for approximately 80% of commercially insured members in those states between 2015 and 2020.
Over 6 years, we observed 2019 mergers between physician firms that spanned from small single-specialty practices to large groups affiliated with health systems.
Approximately 20% of the roughly 15 000 firms were involved in a merger.
Of the nearly 400 000 doctors in our sample, 38% were employed by firms involved in a merger, although only 3.
8% of the doctors were part of an acquired group.
Sixty-three firms made more than 5 acquisitions, and 3 made more than 20 acquisitions.
Health care systems, responsible for approximately 40% of mergers, frequently engaged in serial acquisitions.
Acquired physician firms are typically small (<10 doctors), and much smaller than the acquiring firm.
We document that many physician mergers occurred in 15 states over 5 years.
A significant fraction of the physician mergers we identified, especially those involving health systems, exhibited characteristics that could indicate the potential for competitive harm.
Our results suggest that researchers should examine the degree to which these competitively suspect mergers have affected competition.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Depersonalised doctors: a cross-sectional study of 564 doctors, 760 consultations and 1876 patient reports in UK general practice
Depersonalised doctors: a cross-sectional study of 564 doctors, 760 consultations and 1876 patient reports in UK general practice
ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to assess burnout in a sample of general practitioners (GPs), to determine factors associated with depersonalisation and to investigate ...
Doctors’ Pride and Ethics: Time to Introspect
Doctors’ Pride and Ethics: Time to Introspect
A doctor’s role in society is unique. Over years, medical science has advanced; publics’ expectations have changed; recentpandemic challenged it. Doctors’ face is blemished by accu...
IDENTIFICATION AND RANKING OF EMPLOYEES’ PHYSICAL BEHAVIORS CRITICAL TO MERGERS
IDENTIFICATION AND RANKING OF EMPLOYEES’ PHYSICAL BEHAVIORS CRITICAL TO MERGERS
This study aims to investigate employees’ physical behaviors under the environment of mergers. Chaotic recognition and disorderly hierarchicalization of critical physical behaviors...
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash ABSTRACT Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below: RTD: Beyond Hospit...
Assessment of Quality of Life of Doctors during Corona Pandemic in a Tertiary Hospital in Dhaka City
Assessment of Quality of Life of Doctors during Corona Pandemic in a Tertiary Hospital in Dhaka City
Background: Corona pandemic is an event where there is a rupture of the normal life pattern. The healthcare professionals specially doctors had faced an unknown potential threat to...

Back to Top