Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Cultural Explanations of Individual Preferences for Influence Tactics in Cross Cultural Encounters
View through CrossRef
This study explored if, and how, cultural values affected the types of organizational goals pursued in work-related influence attempts, and which influence tactics were used to achieve these goals. A scenario-based field study of 223 part-time MBAs from three countries - the United States, Romania, and Japan - showed that similar organizational goals were sought in these countries in upward, lateral, and downward influence attempts. In general, respondents preferred using rational explanations, inspirational appeals, and consultation tactics, and disliked using pressure tactics. In simulated work situations, respondents' choices of influence tactics differed, depending on their cultural values. National culture had a significant influence on ingratiation, exchange, personal appeals, and coalition tactics. Within each culture, gender had a significant influence on ingratiation tactics, and the type of organizational goal pursued had a significant influence on rational explanation, inspirational appeals, consultation, and ingratiation tactics.
Title: Cultural Explanations of Individual Preferences for Influence Tactics in Cross Cultural Encounters
Description:
This study explored if, and how, cultural values affected the types of organizational goals pursued in work-related influence attempts, and which influence tactics were used to achieve these goals.
A scenario-based field study of 223 part-time MBAs from three countries - the United States, Romania, and Japan - showed that similar organizational goals were sought in these countries in upward, lateral, and downward influence attempts.
In general, respondents preferred using rational explanations, inspirational appeals, and consultation tactics, and disliked using pressure tactics.
In simulated work situations, respondents' choices of influence tactics differed, depending on their cultural values.
National culture had a significant influence on ingratiation, exchange, personal appeals, and coalition tactics.
Within each culture, gender had a significant influence on ingratiation tactics, and the type of organizational goal pursued had a significant influence on rational explanation, inspirational appeals, consultation, and ingratiation tactics.
Related Results
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
TAKTIK RETORIS NAJWA SHIHAB PADA PROGRAM TALK SHOW MATA NAJWA DI METRO TV
TAKTIK RETORIS NAJWA SHIHAB PADA PROGRAM TALK SHOW MATA NAJWA DI METRO TV
The research aims to describe the rhetorical tactics used by Najwa Shihab on the Mata Najwa talk show program that aired on one of Indonesia’s private television stations, Metro TV...
Multivariate Mate Choice Constrains Mate Preference Evolution
Multivariate Mate Choice Constrains Mate Preference Evolution
Mate preferences are ideals or standards believed to guide our mate choices, which are crucial to an individual’s inclusive fitness. In evolutionary psychology, many specific mate ...
Cross-cultural Encounters in Urban Festivals: Between Liberation and Domination
Cross-cultural Encounters in Urban Festivals: Between Liberation and Domination
This paper is part of a wider research project on Paradoxical Spaces: Encountering the Other in Public Space that explores how cultural difference is practiced and negotiated in di...
Explanation in history and social science
Explanation in history and social science
Historians and social scientists explain at least two sorts of things: (a) those individual human actions that have historical or social significance, such as Stalin’s decision to ...
Biasing Rule-Based Explanations Towards User Preferences
Biasing Rule-Based Explanations Towards User Preferences
With the growing prevalence of Explainable AI (XAI), the effectiveness, transparency, usefulness, and trustworthiness of explanations have come into focus. However, recent work in ...
Eliciting Single-Peaked Preferences Using Comparison Queries
Eliciting Single-Peaked Preferences Using Comparison Queries
Voting is a general method for aggregating the preferences of multiple agents. Each agent ranks all the possible alternatives, and based on this, an aggregate ranking of the alter...
Counterfactual Models for Fair and Adequate Explanations
Counterfactual Models for Fair and Adequate Explanations
Recent efforts have uncovered various methods for providing explanations that can help interpret the behavior of machine learning programs. Exact explanations with a rigorous logic...

