Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Sustainability, risk management and governance: towards an integrative approach

View through CrossRef
Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to present a granulated governance perspective to face sustainability risks and challenges that our planet is facing. The authors argue that sustainability challenges should be addressed simultaneously at the individual, organizational, sectorial, national and supranational level. Financial institutions have a systemic impact on the economy, and on the functioning of our societies. Therefore, a culture of profit maximization and unbridled risk-taking, notwithstanding the external costs and impacts, contaminates not only the financial system and the economy, but also individual norms of responsibility. In this line of reasoning, the global financial crisis revealed the destabilizing effects on the economy, society and corporations and forms a serious impediment for sustainable business. This is a huge challenge for sustainability business and corporate governance; however, it is an illusion to think that managers can prevent scandals and moral norm deterioration without support from other social players.Design/methodology/approach– This paper offers a conceptual analysis on the past financial crisis (2008-2012). It questions the focus on sustainability at the corporate level, and suggests a more comprehensive method for governance. The authors argue in favour of sustainability implementation, combining different governance levels.Findings– The double-dip financial crisis 2008-2012 showed the failure of an unsustainable global system. It becomes clear that corporate responsibility and corporate governance are limited in their contribution to sustainable business in a sustainable economy. Hence, it is important to have a more integrated approach to address sustainability risks, with a solution at individual, sectorial, national and supranational governance levels.Research limitations/implications– This contribution advances five different levels of governance to mitigate risks for sustainable business, arguing in favour of integrated governance for sustainability risks. However, an empirical validation of these ideas still needs to be developed. Future empirical research is needed to validate the five levels of governance. Future research is also needed to better grasp the mechanisms in support of governance.Practical implications– Corporate responsibility and corporate governance are necessary but not sufficient conditions to address the sustainability risks one faces. All actors in the economy recognize that governance for sustainable business in a sustainable economy is a collaborative effort for which neither legislative nor institutional or behavioural norms are developed in an integrated way. They should also recognize that integrated governance is not only imperative for the common good, but also in the direct interest of shareholders and other stakeholders.Originality/value– This paper contributes to the literature on corporate responsibility and corporate governance with the identification of specific roles for regulators, sector representatives and individuals, which are complementary to the role of the companies in creating the conditions for sustainable business in a sustainable economy.
Title: Sustainability, risk management and governance: towards an integrative approach
Description:
Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to present a granulated governance perspective to face sustainability risks and challenges that our planet is facing.
The authors argue that sustainability challenges should be addressed simultaneously at the individual, organizational, sectorial, national and supranational level.
Financial institutions have a systemic impact on the economy, and on the functioning of our societies.
Therefore, a culture of profit maximization and unbridled risk-taking, notwithstanding the external costs and impacts, contaminates not only the financial system and the economy, but also individual norms of responsibility.
In this line of reasoning, the global financial crisis revealed the destabilizing effects on the economy, society and corporations and forms a serious impediment for sustainable business.
This is a huge challenge for sustainability business and corporate governance; however, it is an illusion to think that managers can prevent scandals and moral norm deterioration without support from other social players.
Design/methodology/approach– This paper offers a conceptual analysis on the past financial crisis (2008-2012).
It questions the focus on sustainability at the corporate level, and suggests a more comprehensive method for governance.
The authors argue in favour of sustainability implementation, combining different governance levels.
Findings– The double-dip financial crisis 2008-2012 showed the failure of an unsustainable global system.
It becomes clear that corporate responsibility and corporate governance are limited in their contribution to sustainable business in a sustainable economy.
Hence, it is important to have a more integrated approach to address sustainability risks, with a solution at individual, sectorial, national and supranational governance levels.
Research limitations/implications– This contribution advances five different levels of governance to mitigate risks for sustainable business, arguing in favour of integrated governance for sustainability risks.
However, an empirical validation of these ideas still needs to be developed.
Future empirical research is needed to validate the five levels of governance.
Future research is also needed to better grasp the mechanisms in support of governance.
Practical implications– Corporate responsibility and corporate governance are necessary but not sufficient conditions to address the sustainability risks one faces.
All actors in the economy recognize that governance for sustainable business in a sustainable economy is a collaborative effort for which neither legislative nor institutional or behavioural norms are developed in an integrated way.
They should also recognize that integrated governance is not only imperative for the common good, but also in the direct interest of shareholders and other stakeholders.
Originality/value– This paper contributes to the literature on corporate responsibility and corporate governance with the identification of specific roles for regulators, sector representatives and individuals, which are complementary to the role of the companies in creating the conditions for sustainable business in a sustainable economy.

Related Results

Integrated Water Resources Management Approaches to Improve Water Resources Governance
Integrated Water Resources Management Approaches to Improve Water Resources Governance
The water crisis can alternatively be called a governance crisis. Thus, the demand for good water governance to ensure effective water resources management and to attain specific w...
How Should College Physical Education (CPE) Conduct Collaborative Governance? A Survey Based on Chinese Colleges
How Should College Physical Education (CPE) Conduct Collaborative Governance? A Survey Based on Chinese Colleges
Background and Aim: College physical education (CPE) is a Key Stage in the transition from school physical education to national sports. Collaborative governance is an effective ne...
Evaluating Change and Innovation of Marine Governance Arrangements under the European Green Deal
Evaluating Change and Innovation of Marine Governance Arrangements under the European Green Deal
Marine ecosystems are facing substantial stress due to global environmental challenges that have escalated in magnitude and impact. The European Green Deal (EGD) is acting as a dri...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Exploring the Path of Modernization of Urban Community Governance
Exploring the Path of Modernization of Urban Community Governance
China has entered a new journey of building a modern socialist country in an all-round way. As the basic unit of urban grassroots governance and the spatial organisation of social ...
Differentiating clinical governance, clinical management and clinical practice
Differentiating clinical governance, clinical management and clinical practice
PurposeThis paper seeks to review prior definitions of the umbrella term “clinical governance”. The research question is: do clinical governance definitions adequately distinguish ...

Back to Top