Javascript must be enabled to continue!
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center: New 2014 WIPO Rules; WIPO FRAND Arbitration
View through CrossRef
The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (WIPO Center) is a neutral, international and non-profit dispute resolution provider that offers time- and cost-efficient alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options. The mediation, arbitration and expert determination procedures offered by the WIPO Center are widely recognized as particularly appropriate for technology, entertainment and other disputes involving intellectual property. With twenty years of experience handling such disputes, about 40% of the WPO Center's cases involve patents, and 33 % concern information and communication technology. Effective on June 1, 2014, the WIPO Center amended its Mediation, (Expedited) Arbitration and Expert Determination Rules. Informed by WIPO case experience and the global evolution of ADR practices, the new WIPO Rules introduce several novelties, notably with a view to multiparty arbitration and emergency relief. In a separate development, the WIPO Center recently made available tailored model agreements that companies involved in the telecom industry may use to refer a dispute concerning the fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms to WIPO Mediation and (Expedited) Arbitration. Aiming to facilitate cost- and time-effective FRAND adjudication, these model agreements were developed in consultation with patent law, standardization and arbitration experts from various jurisdictions, including the Secretariat of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI).
Title: WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center: New 2014 WIPO Rules; WIPO FRAND Arbitration
Description:
The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (WIPO Center) is a neutral, international and non-profit dispute resolution provider that offers time- and cost-efficient alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options.
The mediation, arbitration and expert determination procedures offered by the WIPO Center are widely recognized as particularly appropriate for technology, entertainment and other disputes involving intellectual property.
With twenty years of experience handling such disputes, about 40% of the WPO Center's cases involve patents, and 33 % concern information and communication technology.
Effective on June 1, 2014, the WIPO Center amended its Mediation, (Expedited) Arbitration and Expert Determination Rules.
Informed by WIPO case experience and the global evolution of ADR practices, the new WIPO Rules introduce several novelties, notably with a view to multiparty arbitration and emergency relief.
In a separate development, the WIPO Center recently made available tailored model agreements that companies involved in the telecom industry may use to refer a dispute concerning the fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms to WIPO Mediation and (Expedited) Arbitration.
Aiming to facilitate cost- and time-effective FRAND adjudication, these model agreements were developed in consultation with patent law, standardization and arbitration experts from various jurisdictions, including the Secretariat of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI).
Related Results
WIPO Mediation
WIPO Mediation
Abstract
With offices in Geneva, Switzerland and in Singapore, the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (WIPO Center), established in 1994, is a neutral, internatio...
International Investment Arbitration
International Investment Arbitration
International investment arbitration is heterogeneous. At its core, it represents the settlement of international investment disputes between foreign investors and host States by a...
Azərbaycan Respublikasinda arbitraj mübahisələrin həllinin alternativ üsulu kimi
Azərbaycan Respublikasinda arbitraj mübahisələrin həllinin alternativ üsulu kimi
The article analyses in detail the recently adopted Law on Arbitration in the Republic of Azerbaijan, which was intended to replace the Law on International Arbitration. The Law se...
THE IMPORTANCE OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN WRITING: INTERNATIONAL, INDONESIA, AND NEW ZEALAND
THE IMPORTANCE OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN WRITING: INTERNATIONAL, INDONESIA, AND NEW ZEALAND
International commercial arbitration has been one of the popular means to solve a dispute, including in Indonesia and New Zealand. In the event the cross-border commercial parties ...
Huawei/ZTE, een nieuwe standaard in FRAND-zaken?
Huawei/ZTE, een nieuwe standaard in FRAND-zaken?
Huawei/ZTE, een nieuwe standaard in FRAND-zaken?
Standaard-essentiële octrooien (‘SEP’s’) zijn octrooien die essentieel zijn voor de toepassing van een bepaalde industrie...
The Ping-Pong Olympics of Antisuit Injunction in FRAND Litigation
The Ping-Pong Olympics of Antisuit Injunction in FRAND Litigation
In the past two years, antisuit injunctions (ASIs) and subsequent legal proceedings associated with standard-essential patents (SEPs) subject to fair, reasonable, and nondiscrimina...
Evolution of Arbitration System under the China FTZ Template
Evolution of Arbitration System under the China FTZ Template
The construction of China’s free trade zones (FTZs) has levered the evolution of the arbitration regime in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Under the FTZ template, breakthroug...
PITFALLS IN THE DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION IN PAKISTAN
PITFALLS IN THE DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION IN PAKISTAN
Arbitration is a well-known and increasingly popular alternative dispute resolution method. It is a safe, cost-effective, and time-efficient alternative dispute resolution method. ...

