Javascript must be enabled to continue!
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center: New 2014 WIPO Rules; WIPO FRAND Arbitration
View through CrossRef
The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (WIPO Center) is a neutral, international and non-profit dispute resolution provider that offers time- and cost-efficient alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options. The mediation, arbitration and expert determination procedures offered by the WIPO Center are widely recognized as particularly appropriate for technology, entertainment and other disputes involving intellectual property. With twenty years of experience handling such disputes, about 40% of the WPO Center's cases involve patents, and 33 % concern information and communication technology. Effective on June 1, 2014, the WIPO Center amended its Mediation, (Expedited) Arbitration and Expert Determination Rules. Informed by WIPO case experience and the global evolution of ADR practices, the new WIPO Rules introduce several novelties, notably with a view to multiparty arbitration and emergency relief. In a separate development, the WIPO Center recently made available tailored model agreements that companies involved in the telecom industry may use to refer a dispute concerning the fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms to WIPO Mediation and (Expedited) Arbitration. Aiming to facilitate cost- and time-effective FRAND adjudication, these model agreements were developed in consultation with patent law, standardization and arbitration experts from various jurisdictions, including the Secretariat of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI).
Title: WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center: New 2014 WIPO Rules; WIPO FRAND Arbitration
Description:
The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (WIPO Center) is a neutral, international and non-profit dispute resolution provider that offers time- and cost-efficient alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options.
The mediation, arbitration and expert determination procedures offered by the WIPO Center are widely recognized as particularly appropriate for technology, entertainment and other disputes involving intellectual property.
With twenty years of experience handling such disputes, about 40% of the WPO Center's cases involve patents, and 33 % concern information and communication technology.
Effective on June 1, 2014, the WIPO Center amended its Mediation, (Expedited) Arbitration and Expert Determination Rules.
Informed by WIPO case experience and the global evolution of ADR practices, the new WIPO Rules introduce several novelties, notably with a view to multiparty arbitration and emergency relief.
In a separate development, the WIPO Center recently made available tailored model agreements that companies involved in the telecom industry may use to refer a dispute concerning the fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms to WIPO Mediation and (Expedited) Arbitration.
Aiming to facilitate cost- and time-effective FRAND adjudication, these model agreements were developed in consultation with patent law, standardization and arbitration experts from various jurisdictions, including the Secretariat of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI).
Related Results
WIPO Mediation
WIPO Mediation
Abstract
With offices in Geneva, Switzerland and in Singapore, the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (WIPO Center), established in 1994, is a neutral, internatio...
The Mass Arbitration Illusion
The Mass Arbitration Illusion
Mass arbitration has emerged as the latest battleground in the ongoing tug-of-war between corporations and their consumers and employees regarding binding mandatory arbitration cla...
The genesis of the concept of international commercial arbitration
The genesis of the concept of international commercial arbitration
This article is dedicated to the study and disclosure of the legal essence of international commercial arbitration as a legal phenomenon representing an alternative method of resol...
The Arbitration Clause as Super Contract
The Arbitration Clause as Super Contract
It is widely acknowledged that the purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act was to place arbitration clauses on “equal footing” with other contracts. Nonetheless, federal and state c...
International Investment Arbitration
International Investment Arbitration
International investment arbitration is heterogeneous. At its core, it represents the settlement of international investment disputes between foreign investors and host States by a...
Offensive Arbitration
Offensive Arbitration
The standard critique of binding arbitration for consumer and employment disputes is that arbitration favors defendants. Arbitration often has reduced discovery, shortened statutes...
Building a Global International Arbitration Center of China: Independence, Internationalism and Immunity
Building a Global International Arbitration Center of China: Independence, Internationalism and Immunity
This paper explores contemporary issues and provides insights into arbitration as practiced in China’s cross border business and commercial domains. It employs a qualitative method...
Arbitration Effect
Arbitration Effect
Arbitration is changing American law and its justice system. Critics argue that arbitration leads to claim suppression. Proponents contend that it is cheaper and less formal. These...

