Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center: New 2014 WIPO Rules; WIPO FRAND Arbitration

View through CrossRef
The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (WIPO Center) is a neutral, international and non-profit dispute resolution provider that offers time- and cost-efficient alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options. The mediation, arbitration and expert determination procedures offered by the WIPO Center are widely recognized as particularly appropriate for technology, entertainment and other disputes involving intellectual property. With twenty years of experience handling such disputes, about 40% of the WPO Center's cases involve patents, and 33 % concern information and communication technology. Effective on June 1, 2014, the WIPO Center amended its Mediation, (Expedited) Arbitration and Expert Determination Rules. Informed by WIPO case experience and the global evolution of ADR practices, the new WIPO Rules introduce several novelties, notably with a view to multiparty arbitration and emergency relief. In a separate development, the WIPO Center recently made available tailored model agreements that companies involved in the telecom industry may use to refer a dispute concerning the fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms to WIPO Mediation and (Expedited) Arbitration. Aiming to facilitate cost- and time-effective FRAND adjudication, these model agreements were developed in consultation with patent law, standardization and arbitration experts from various jurisdictions, including the Secretariat of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI).
Title: WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center: New 2014 WIPO Rules; WIPO FRAND Arbitration
Description:
The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (WIPO Center) is a neutral, international and non-profit dispute resolution provider that offers time- and cost-efficient alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options.
The mediation, arbitration and expert determination procedures offered by the WIPO Center are widely recognized as particularly appropriate for technology, entertainment and other disputes involving intellectual property.
With twenty years of experience handling such disputes, about 40% of the WPO Center's cases involve patents, and 33 % concern information and communication technology.
Effective on June 1, 2014, the WIPO Center amended its Mediation, (Expedited) Arbitration and Expert Determination Rules.
Informed by WIPO case experience and the global evolution of ADR practices, the new WIPO Rules introduce several novelties, notably with a view to multiparty arbitration and emergency relief.
In a separate development, the WIPO Center recently made available tailored model agreements that companies involved in the telecom industry may use to refer a dispute concerning the fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms to WIPO Mediation and (Expedited) Arbitration.
Aiming to facilitate cost- and time-effective FRAND adjudication, these model agreements were developed in consultation with patent law, standardization and arbitration experts from various jurisdictions, including the Secretariat of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI).

Related Results

Evolution of Arbitration System under the China FTZ Template
Evolution of Arbitration System under the China FTZ Template
The construction of China’s free trade zones (FTZs) has levered the evolution of the arbitration regime in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Under the FTZ template, breakthroug...
MEDIATION AS A TOOL FOR ADDRESSING GAPS IN CIVIL LEGISLATION AMID ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION
MEDIATION AS A TOOL FOR ADDRESSING GAPS IN CIVIL LEGISLATION AMID ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION
In the contemporary context, the provision of legal support for innovative processes affecting the economic, political and social development of society is becoming increasingly si...
АЛЬТЕРНАТИВНОЕ РАЗРЕШЕНИЕ СПОРА (ADR) В ТУРЦИИ
АЛЬТЕРНАТИВНОЕ РАЗРЕШЕНИЕ СПОРА (ADR) В ТУРЦИИ
В статье рассмотрен опыт альтернативного разрешения споров в Турции. Рассмотрены как правовые нормы, так и практический механизм действия разрешения споров на территории рассматрив...
An Interactional Perspective on Interpreting as Mediation
An Interactional Perspective on Interpreting as Mediation
The importance of mediation in dialogue interpreting has been highlighted in a number of recent studies. Franz Pöchhacker has outlined three analytical dimensions to look at interp...
Application of Precedents in International Arbitration
Application of Precedents in International Arbitration
In spite of the extensive development and use of arbitration, there is a lack of clarity on the application of precedent in international arbitration. It has been commonly accepted...
Mediation in Family Disputes: An Appraisal of the Role of Arbitration Councils
Mediation in Family Disputes: An Appraisal of the Role of Arbitration Councils
Arbitration is a form of alternate dispute resolution (ADR) in which the matters are settled outside the court. In Family matters,arbitration plays a vital role in overcoming the d...
ARBITRATION IN CHINA AND ASEAN: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES
ARBITRATION IN CHINA AND ASEAN: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES
This paper seeks to explore key issues and challenges impacting trade and business disputes between China and ASEAN countries. Arbitration has become increasingly popular as a disp...
The Impact of International Commercial Arbitration Treaties on Legal System of Pakistan: A Focus on Foreign Arbitral Awards
The Impact of International Commercial Arbitration Treaties on Legal System of Pakistan: A Focus on Foreign Arbitral Awards
Objectives: This study examined the impact of international commercial arbitration treaties on Pakistan's legal system with a specific focus on the enforcement and recognition of f...

Back to Top