Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Professors in Humanities at Vilnius University and the Doctrine in the Period of Activities of Donatas Sauka

View through CrossRef
The analysis of professors in Humanities at Vilnius University in 1948–1956, the period of studies and post-graduate course of Donatas Sauka, established that professors who had not accepted the doctrine of Marxism-Leninism and who had obtained their academic titles in independent Lithuania or pre-revolutionary Russia had left the university. During the first year of Soviet rule, a group of persons who had contributed to Lithuania’s incorporation into the USSR and undertaken to establish the doctrine at the university became professors. They were active in the 1940s and 1950s and created a climate of fear. Some lecturers who were neutral towards the doctrine had been granted the title of professors for their contribution to the science in order to raise the prestige of the university. A cluster of lecturers who attempted to interpret literature without applying primitive sociologisation was formed in the Department of Lithuanian Literature in mid 1950s. At the initiative of the Central Committee of the Lithuanian Communist Party, actions were taken (1956–1961) to force the group of young lecturers to follow the requirements of the doctrine. Having defied the requirements, they were dismissed. D. Sauka belonged to the group, but had retained his job as a lecturer without changing his views towards the doctrine. Some professors, associate professors, and students at the university participated in the ideological cleansing of the Department of Lithuanian Literature. They were later promoted. During the 1960s, among literary scholars only Jurgis Lebedys became a professor. At that time, high qualification requirements for obtaining a professor’s title were set in the USSR. Those who had obtained the titles of professors had different approaches towards the doctrine of Marxism-Leninism. Some showed support only formally and expanded the scope of analysed issues by slowly validating new fields of knowledge and developed individual thinking; others attained high qualification and performed the actions of implementing the doctrine required by the party leaders; still others sought their personal goals by using maintenance of the doctrine as a pretext. The guardians of the doctrine created obstacles for unwanted persons in becoming professors by trying to prevent them from defending their doctoral (post-doctoral) theses and publishing their articles and works; they tried to create a wall of silence around them. In the 1970s, D. Sauka and Vytautas Kubilius defended their doctoral (post-doctoral) theses; both of them had surpassed the topics defined by the doctrine and opened new fields of knowledge in Lithuanian literature and culture. Attempts were made to prevent them from defending their theses, but thanks to the vigilance of his colleagues, D. Sauka defended his thesis and became a professor after four years. The approval of V. Kubilius’s doctoral (post-doctoral) title lasted six years, yet one of the strongest literary critics and scholars was not granted the title of professor from the Soviet university. In the 1980s, a number of students at Vilnius University obtained titles of professors. The doctrine itself had changed at that time, the communist government avoided scandals, the level of mentality was higher at the university, and simultaneously, the behaviour of lecturers themselves was self-censored; some of the guardians of the doctrine had voluntarily abandoned their position and those who appreciated the works of their talented colleagues appeared. At the juncture of the 1980s and 1990s, professors of Vilnius University became more prominent in the society: these were personalities that developed individual thinking of their own and others, done valuable work for the culture of Lithuania, retained relations with the nation and had the goal of creating an independent state of Lithuania.
Vilnius University Press
Title: Professors in Humanities at Vilnius University and the Doctrine in the Period of Activities of Donatas Sauka
Description:
The analysis of professors in Humanities at Vilnius University in 1948–1956, the period of studies and post-graduate course of Donatas Sauka, established that professors who had not accepted the doctrine of Marxism-Leninism and who had obtained their academic titles in independent Lithuania or pre-revolutionary Russia had left the university.
During the first year of Soviet rule, a group of persons who had contributed to Lithuania’s incorporation into the USSR and undertaken to establish the doctrine at the university became professors.
They were active in the 1940s and 1950s and created a climate of fear.
Some lecturers who were neutral towards the doctrine had been granted the title of professors for their contribution to the science in order to raise the prestige of the university.
A cluster of lecturers who attempted to interpret literature without applying primitive sociologisation was formed in the Department of Lithuanian Literature in mid 1950s.
At the initiative of the Central Committee of the Lithuanian Communist Party, actions were taken (1956–1961) to force the group of young lecturers to follow the requirements of the doctrine.
Having defied the requirements, they were dismissed.
D.
Sauka belonged to the group, but had retained his job as a lecturer without changing his views towards the doctrine.
Some professors, associate professors, and students at the university participated in the ideological cleansing of the Department of Lithuanian Literature.
They were later promoted.
During the 1960s, among literary scholars only Jurgis Lebedys became a professor.
At that time, high qualification requirements for obtaining a professor’s title were set in the USSR.
Those who had obtained the titles of professors had different approaches towards the doctrine of Marxism-Leninism.
Some showed support only formally and expanded the scope of analysed issues by slowly validating new fields of knowledge and developed individual thinking; others attained high qualification and performed the actions of implementing the doctrine required by the party leaders; still others sought their personal goals by using maintenance of the doctrine as a pretext.
The guardians of the doctrine created obstacles for unwanted persons in becoming professors by trying to prevent them from defending their doctoral (post-doctoral) theses and publishing their articles and works; they tried to create a wall of silence around them.
In the 1970s, D.
Sauka and Vytautas Kubilius defended their doctoral (post-doctoral) theses; both of them had surpassed the topics defined by the doctrine and opened new fields of knowledge in Lithuanian literature and culture.
Attempts were made to prevent them from defending their theses, but thanks to the vigilance of his colleagues, D.
Sauka defended his thesis and became a professor after four years.
The approval of V.
Kubilius’s doctoral (post-doctoral) title lasted six years, yet one of the strongest literary critics and scholars was not granted the title of professor from the Soviet university.
In the 1980s, a number of students at Vilnius University obtained titles of professors.
The doctrine itself had changed at that time, the communist government avoided scandals, the level of mentality was higher at the university, and simultaneously, the behaviour of lecturers themselves was self-censored; some of the guardians of the doctrine had voluntarily abandoned their position and those who appreciated the works of their talented colleagues appeared.
At the juncture of the 1980s and 1990s, professors of Vilnius University became more prominent in the society: these were personalities that developed individual thinking of their own and others, done valuable work for the culture of Lithuania, retained relations with the nation and had the goal of creating an independent state of Lithuania.

Related Results

Folkloristics without Illusions. Some Thoughts on the Contexts of Folklore Research by Donatas Sauka
Folkloristics without Illusions. Some Thoughts on the Contexts of Folklore Research by Donatas Sauka
The 90th anniversary of birth of the famous Lithuanian literary scholar and folklorist, professor of the Vilnius University Donatas Sauka (1929–2015) is celebrated in 2019. The art...
The Interpretation of Tomas Venclova‘s Vilnius Text
The Interpretation of Tomas Venclova‘s Vilnius Text
The article examines the concept of Vilnius text in Tomas Venclova’s cultural works. Venclova wrote a variety of texts dedicated to Vilnius in various genres, such as poems, the we...
Donatas Sauka’s Project of Comparative Literature: “Programme Maximum“
Donatas Sauka’s Project of Comparative Literature: “Programme Maximum“
The article discusses Donatas Sauka’s study An Epilogue of Faust’s Age (1998) in order to assess the reference to “comparative literature science” expressed in the introduction to ...
VILNIAUS AKADEMINĖ BENDRUOMENĖ IR JOS BIBLIOTEKA XIX AMŽIAUS PIRMOJOJE PUSĖJE: IMPERINIO VALDYMO ĮTAKA
VILNIAUS AKADEMINĖ BENDRUOMENĖ IR JOS BIBLIOTEKA XIX AMŽIAUS PIRMOJOJE PUSĖJE: IMPERINIO VALDYMO ĮTAKA
The subject of the research depending to the his­tory of the librarianship of Lithuania is directly connected to the political and social situation in the state in the beginning of...
The Importance of Donatas Sauka‘s Book Apie laiką ir save
The Importance of Donatas Sauka‘s Book Apie laiką ir save
Donatas Sauka, Apie laiką ir save, sudarė, įvadą ir komentarus parašė Saulė Matulevičienė, Vilnius: Lietuvių literatūros ir tautosakos institutas, 2019, 294 p., ISBN 978-609-425-24...
Military Aspects of the Lithuanian-Polish Conflict of 1918-1920
Military Aspects of the Lithuanian-Polish Conflict of 1918-1920
After restoration of independence in 1918 the Lithuanian state from the very beginning of its activities had to defend the recognition of its very existence and territory by means ...
Why Americans (Dis)trust Professors: Identity, Stereotypes, and the Case of Religion Professors
Why Americans (Dis)trust Professors: Identity, Stereotypes, and the Case of Religion Professors
Americans’ confidence in higher education is falling, almost exclusively among the political and religious right. Though this is typically framed as perceptions of anti-conservativ...
The Gift of Vilnius University to the Burnt Library of Åbo Academy (1827–1829)
The Gift of Vilnius University to the Burnt Library of Åbo Academy (1827–1829)
Expanding the research about the old Vilnius University Library launched by L. Vladimirovas, this article discusses the fact (which has never been mentioned in historiography), abo...

Back to Top