Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Requirements of informed‐consent to xenotransplantation: a qualitative interview study
View through CrossRef
BackgroundThe aim is to establish xenotransplantation as a possible alternative to allotransplantation. The clinical application requires that patients give their informed consent before the transfer of the xenograft. The first informed‐consent‐documents have already been developed. The International Xenotransplantation Association has formulated recommendations for the informed consent process [1]. Nevertheless, up to now it has not yet been examined empirically under which conditions people are ready to consent to a xenotransplantation and how these can be implemented appropriately in the informed consent process.Aims of the qualitatve study: The aims of the study include:
to find out which information patients need to be able to make a decision for or against a xenotransplantation;
to investigate how the partners and other family members of possible xenotransplantation patients handle their role and the responsibilites linked to it;
to ask physicians about their attitude to xenotransplantations and their opinion about which information patients need to be able to make a decision for or against a xenotransplantation;
to contribute to improving informed‐ consent‐documents for xenotransplantation patients.
Concept and methodology of the study: People should receive the possibility to express their personal considerations and appraisals of the possibility of a xenotransplantation. Hence, we have chose a qualitative study design. Members of the following groups will be interviewed:
patients who are waiting for a suitable organ
their family members
patients who have already received an organ
healthy subjects
healthy care providers (especially transplant surgeons)
On the one hand, the composition of the sample allows us to gather different perspectives on the requirements of participating in a xenotranplantation trial. On the other hand, we include groups which so far have played a minor role in the socio‐empirical research in the field of xenotransplantation (physicians and members).Prior to the interview, the study participants receive an informed‐consent document for a xenotransplantation. The interview guide covers the following questions:
How do people get along with the informed‐consent‐document? What do they think about the possibilities and restrictions linked to the xenotransplantation?
Which questions are relevant for potential xenotransplantation patients to make an informed decision?
What do family members think about the possibility of a xenotransplantation? How do they handle the restrictions? (e.g. lifelong monitoring)
What attitudes have physicians and nursing staff to xenotransplantations?
DiscussionThe study is still in the conceptual phase. To improve the study design and the interview guide, a discussion with experts from the field of xenotransplantation is important.Reference[1] Vanderpool H. Y. The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes‐ Chapter 7: Informed consent and xenotransplantation clinical trials. Xenotransplantation 2009; 16: 255–262.
Title: Requirements of informed‐consent to xenotransplantation: a qualitative interview study
Description:
BackgroundThe aim is to establish xenotransplantation as a possible alternative to allotransplantation.
The clinical application requires that patients give their informed consent before the transfer of the xenograft.
The first informed‐consent‐documents have already been developed.
The International Xenotransplantation Association has formulated recommendations for the informed consent process [1].
Nevertheless, up to now it has not yet been examined empirically under which conditions people are ready to consent to a xenotransplantation and how these can be implemented appropriately in the informed consent process.
Aims of the qualitatve study: The aims of the study include:
to find out which information patients need to be able to make a decision for or against a xenotransplantation;
to investigate how the partners and other family members of possible xenotransplantation patients handle their role and the responsibilites linked to it;
to ask physicians about their attitude to xenotransplantations and their opinion about which information patients need to be able to make a decision for or against a xenotransplantation;
to contribute to improving informed‐ consent‐documents for xenotransplantation patients.
Concept and methodology of the study: People should receive the possibility to express their personal considerations and appraisals of the possibility of a xenotransplantation.
Hence, we have chose a qualitative study design.
Members of the following groups will be interviewed:
patients who are waiting for a suitable organ
their family members
patients who have already received an organ
healthy subjects
healthy care providers (especially transplant surgeons)
On the one hand, the composition of the sample allows us to gather different perspectives on the requirements of participating in a xenotranplantation trial.
On the other hand, we include groups which so far have played a minor role in the socio‐empirical research in the field of xenotransplantation (physicians and members).
Prior to the interview, the study participants receive an informed‐consent document for a xenotransplantation.
The interview guide covers the following questions:
How do people get along with the informed‐consent‐document? What do they think about the possibilities and restrictions linked to the xenotransplantation?
Which questions are relevant for potential xenotransplantation patients to make an informed decision?
What do family members think about the possibility of a xenotransplantation? How do they handle the restrictions? (e.
g.
lifelong monitoring)
What attitudes have physicians and nursing staff to xenotransplantations?
DiscussionThe study is still in the conceptual phase.
To improve the study design and the interview guide, a discussion with experts from the field of xenotransplantation is important.
Reference[1] Vanderpool H.
Y.
The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes‐ Chapter 7: Informed consent and xenotransplantation clinical trials.
Xenotransplantation 2009; 16: 255–262.
Related Results
Xenotransplantation public perceptions: rather cells than organs
Xenotransplantation public perceptions: rather cells than organs
Omnell Persson M, Persson NH, Ranstam J, Hermerén G. Xenotransplantation public perceptions, rather cells than organs. Xenotransplantation 2003; 10: 72–79. © Blackwell Munksgaard, ...
How should cardiac xenotransplantation be initiated in Japan?
How should cardiac xenotransplantation be initiated in Japan?
AbstractThe world's first clinical cardiac xenotransplantation, using a genetically engineered pig heart with 10 gene modifications, prolonged the life of a 57-year-old man with no...
Complement networks in gene-edited pig xenotransplantation: enhancing transplant success and addressing organ shortage
Complement networks in gene-edited pig xenotransplantation: enhancing transplant success and addressing organ shortage
AbstractThe shortage of organs for transplantation emphasizes the urgent need for alternative solutions. Xenotransplantation has emerged as a promising option due to the greater av...
Clinical Islet Xenotransplantation: Development of Isolation Protocol, Anti-Rejection Strategies, and Clinical Outcomes
Clinical Islet Xenotransplantation: Development of Isolation Protocol, Anti-Rejection Strategies, and Clinical Outcomes
Allogeneic islet transplantation has become a standard therapy for unstable type 1 diabetes. However, considering the large number of type 1 diabetic patients, the shortage of dono...
Development, Piloting and Evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): A protocol for a mixed methods study
Development, Piloting and Evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): A protocol for a mixed methods study
Abstract
Background: Practitioners frequently use informed consent forms to support the physician-patient communication and the informed consent process. Informed consent f...
Development, piloting, and evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): a protocol for a mixed methods study
Development, piloting, and evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): a protocol for a mixed methods study
AbstractBackgroundPractitioners frequently use informed consent forms to support the physician-patient communication and the informed consent process. Informed consent for surgery ...
Current Aspects of Xenotransplantation in Human
Current Aspects of Xenotransplantation in Human
Xenotransplantation is an approach which will be able to support the increasing demand of organ donation since the organ does not need to come from humans. Up till now, xenotranspl...
Informed consent in pediatric anesthesiology
Informed consent in pediatric anesthesiology
SummaryBackgroundInformed consent for pediatric anesthesia is unique because it is (1) obtained from surrogates (ie, parents) rather than from the patient and (2) sought after pare...


