Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Property rights in martial law
View through CrossRef
The right to property is one of the fundamental human rights, guaranteed by both national legislation and international regulatory legal acts. In conditions of martial law or a state of emergency, certain restrictions on the rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen may be established, indicating the period of validity of these restrictions. The Constitution of Ukraine and other regulatory acts allow for the possibility of restricting the right to property in the interests of national security, which necessitates the need to determine the balance between the private interest of the owner and the public interest of the state. During the legal regime of martial law, this balance of interests plays an important role and affects the procedure for the owner to exercise the powers granted to him and the exercise of the right to property.
The right to property is inviolable. No one may be unlawfully deprived of this right or restricted in its exercise. A person may be deprived of the right to property or restricted in its exercise only in cases and in accordance with the procedure established by law.
Although international law is designed to protect human rights, including the right to property, it nevertheless allows for certain restrictions. Thus, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms stipulates that every natural or legal person has the right to peaceful possession of his property. No one may be deprived of his property except in the interests of society and on the conditions provided for by law and the general principles of international law.
The right to property in times of martial law is subject to significant influence from the side of the state, which is due to the needs of national security and defense. Restrictions on the right to property must be clearly regulated by law. This necessitates the need to adapt civil legislation to the operation of the legal regime of martial law, including the creation of compensation mechanisms and simplification of procedures for the protection of property rights.
Requisition of property in times of war must be clearly regulated, have a justified and temporary nature, and be accompanied by fair compensation. Therefore, it is advisable to develop a single methodology for assessing property subject to compulsory alienation and establish clear deadlines for full compensation for its value.
Title: Property rights in martial law
Description:
The right to property is one of the fundamental human rights, guaranteed by both national legislation and international regulatory legal acts.
In conditions of martial law or a state of emergency, certain restrictions on the rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen may be established, indicating the period of validity of these restrictions.
The Constitution of Ukraine and other regulatory acts allow for the possibility of restricting the right to property in the interests of national security, which necessitates the need to determine the balance between the private interest of the owner and the public interest of the state.
During the legal regime of martial law, this balance of interests plays an important role and affects the procedure for the owner to exercise the powers granted to him and the exercise of the right to property.
The right to property is inviolable.
No one may be unlawfully deprived of this right or restricted in its exercise.
A person may be deprived of the right to property or restricted in its exercise only in cases and in accordance with the procedure established by law.
Although international law is designed to protect human rights, including the right to property, it nevertheless allows for certain restrictions.
Thus, Article 1 of Protocol No.
1 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms stipulates that every natural or legal person has the right to peaceful possession of his property.
No one may be deprived of his property except in the interests of society and on the conditions provided for by law and the general principles of international law.
The right to property in times of martial law is subject to significant influence from the side of the state, which is due to the needs of national security and defense.
Restrictions on the right to property must be clearly regulated by law.
This necessitates the need to adapt civil legislation to the operation of the legal regime of martial law, including the creation of compensation mechanisms and simplification of procedures for the protection of property rights.
Requisition of property in times of war must be clearly regulated, have a justified and temporary nature, and be accompanied by fair compensation.
Therefore, it is advisable to develop a single methodology for assessing property subject to compulsory alienation and establish clear deadlines for full compensation for its value.
Related Results
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Property rights in martial law
Property rights in martial law
The article is devoted to the study of property rights in martial law, the definition of «forced alienation of property» and «seizure of property», reveals their characteristics.
...
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
531Human rights — Rights of women in Northern Ireland — Pregnant women and girls — Autonomy and bodily integrity — Right to respect for private and family life — Rights of persons ...
Implications Of Legal Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights For Obtaining Economic Benefits
Implications Of Legal Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights For Obtaining Economic Benefits
Intellectual property rights are an implication of the development of international trade, especially in industrial countries. In developing countries, the understanding and protec...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Regina (Keyu) and Others v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another
Regina (Keyu) and Others v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another
Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Effect in municipal law — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 2 of Convention — Human Rights Act 19...
Non-Martial and Martial Methods to an Ultimate Political Goal of the Tiger Movement in Sri Lanka
Non-Martial and Martial Methods to an Ultimate Political Goal of the Tiger Movement in Sri Lanka
The Tiger Movement had one ultimate political goal, and two main alternating methods to reach this goal, which was to obtain recognition by world community for the right of self-de...

