Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Lexicography

View through CrossRef
Lexicography is concerned with dictionaries, both with the processes of compilation and with the study of the finished products. The latter is sometimes called “metalexicography” or “dictionary research.” The distinction is also drawn by referring to the compilation of dictionaries as “practical lexicography” and to the study of dictionaries as “theoretical lexicography.” The focus of this bibliography is on theoretical lexicography, but in many publications the distinction is not finely drawn. Dictionaries come in many shapes and sizes, in many forms and formats; and the study of them reflects that diversity. Academic lexicographers will often specialize and focus their research on some aspect of lexicography, which may be either a particular type of dictionary (e.g., dictionaries for learners, bilingual dictionaries, historical dictionaries, sign language dictionaries, slang dictionaries) or a particular facet of dictionary compilation (e.g., defining styles, usage notes, treatment of pronunciation). Lexicography has seen wide-ranging and radical changes in the last couple of decades, as it has been heavily influenced by the electronic revolution. Not only are most current dictionaries now available in a digital version, but many older dictionaries have also been digitized and made accessible via the Internet. Electronic lexicography, or e-lexicography, is a fast-moving area, as dictionary makers grapple with the potential opened up by digital formats. In this Google age, dictionaries have to find their place among a plethora of information resources on the Internet; consequently, considerable attention is being paid by academic lexicographers to the future of dictionaries. Lexicography, both practical and theoretical, has a long history, which predates the development of modern linguistics and has developed independently of it. Samuel Johnson’s “Plan of a Dictionary” (1747) is an example of an early contribution to theoretical lexicography, and Philip Gove, editor-in-chief of Webster’s Third New International Dictionary (1961) was the first dictionary editor to acknowledge explicitly the influence of modern linguistics on his lexicographical practice. This raises the question whether lexicography can be considered as a sub-discipline of linguistics. Some academic lexicographers do view lexicography as an applied linguistic practice; but some would argue that lexicography sits more comfortably within the broader remit of reference science, since it has much in common with other reference disciplines. The development of e-lexicography pushes lexicography further in this direction, as electronic dictionaries take their place among a plethora of reference resources on the Internet, all of which may be accessed by a single Google search.
Oxford University Press
Title: Lexicography
Description:
Lexicography is concerned with dictionaries, both with the processes of compilation and with the study of the finished products.
The latter is sometimes called “metalexicography” or “dictionary research.
” The distinction is also drawn by referring to the compilation of dictionaries as “practical lexicography” and to the study of dictionaries as “theoretical lexicography.
” The focus of this bibliography is on theoretical lexicography, but in many publications the distinction is not finely drawn.
Dictionaries come in many shapes and sizes, in many forms and formats; and the study of them reflects that diversity.
Academic lexicographers will often specialize and focus their research on some aspect of lexicography, which may be either a particular type of dictionary (e.
g.
, dictionaries for learners, bilingual dictionaries, historical dictionaries, sign language dictionaries, slang dictionaries) or a particular facet of dictionary compilation (e.
g.
, defining styles, usage notes, treatment of pronunciation).
Lexicography has seen wide-ranging and radical changes in the last couple of decades, as it has been heavily influenced by the electronic revolution.
Not only are most current dictionaries now available in a digital version, but many older dictionaries have also been digitized and made accessible via the Internet.
Electronic lexicography, or e-lexicography, is a fast-moving area, as dictionary makers grapple with the potential opened up by digital formats.
In this Google age, dictionaries have to find their place among a plethora of information resources on the Internet; consequently, considerable attention is being paid by academic lexicographers to the future of dictionaries.
Lexicography, both practical and theoretical, has a long history, which predates the development of modern linguistics and has developed independently of it.
Samuel Johnson’s “Plan of a Dictionary” (1747) is an example of an early contribution to theoretical lexicography, and Philip Gove, editor-in-chief of Webster’s Third New International Dictionary (1961) was the first dictionary editor to acknowledge explicitly the influence of modern linguistics on his lexicographical practice.
This raises the question whether lexicography can be considered as a sub-discipline of linguistics.
Some academic lexicographers do view lexicography as an applied linguistic practice; but some would argue that lexicography sits more comfortably within the broader remit of reference science, since it has much in common with other reference disciplines.
The development of e-lexicography pushes lexicography further in this direction, as electronic dictionaries take their place among a plethora of reference resources on the Internet, all of which may be accessed by a single Google search.

Related Results

Whither Chinese–English lexicography? – From a historical perspective
Whither Chinese–English lexicography? – From a historical perspective
2020 marked the 200th anniversary of the publication of the second part of Robert Morrison’s A Dictionary of the Chinese Language which has been widely recognized as the first Chin...
First International Conference on Lexicography at Ilia State University
First International Conference on Lexicography at Ilia State University
The I International Conference Lexicography in the XXI Century was held at Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia from 10 to 12 November 2023. The conference was established in 20...
Bilingual Lexicography from a Communicative Perspective
Bilingual Lexicography from a Communicative Perspective
This stimulating new book, as the premier work introducing bilingual lexicography from a communicative perspective, is launched to represent original thinking and innovative theori...
Chinese Lexicography
Chinese Lexicography
Abstract This comprehensive account of the history of Chinese lexicography is the first book on the subject to be published in English. It traces the development of ...
Lexicography in the 21st Century
Lexicography in the 21st Century
This is a state-of-the-art volume on lexicography at the beginning of the 21st century. It also offers proposals for future theoretical and practical work. The contributions, inspi...
The Future of Metalexicography: Reaching for the Mesosphere
The Future of Metalexicography: Reaching for the Mesosphere
In this research article, a quantified look is taken at the metalexicographic endeavours of the past half century, starting in 1971. It is argued that the year 2021 represents a ti...
Lexikos and AFRILEX — A Perfect Lexicographic Liaison
Lexikos and AFRILEX — A Perfect Lexicographic Liaison
After in-depth discussions with interested parties in 1991 the Bureau of the Woorde­boek van die Afrikaanse Taal (WAT) realized that the future of Afrikaans is inextricably connect...
Manual of Specialised Lexicography
Manual of Specialised Lexicography
From 1990–1994 the Danish Research Council for the Humanities granted a research project entitled “translation of LSP texts”, which was initially split up into five part-projects, ...

Back to Top