Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Size and Shape Constancy are Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Size Constancy Illusion and Linton Shape Constancy Illusion

View through CrossRef
We present two new illusions that challenges our understanding of size and shape constancy, with implications for how we should think about feedback to the primary visual cortex (V1), the perception/cognition distinction, and the neural correlates of visual experience. Size constancy is traditionally thought to affect the perceived angular (2D) size of objects (Murray et al., 2006, Nat. Neurosci. 9 429-434). Indeed, observers are often surprised to find that size constancy stimuli are the same size in image pixels. This affect is now typically attributed to feedback to the primary visual cortex (V1) (Ni et al., 2015, Curr. Biol., 24(14) 1653-1658). A similar claim has been made about shape constancy (Thouless, 1931, Brit. J. Psych., 21 339-359). However, if size and shape constancy really do affect perceived angular (2D) size, then any rectangular frame placed in the same 2D region of the image should also be equally distorted. However, this is not what we find. Instead, pictorial size constancy, stereo size constancy, and stereo shape constancy all persist without distorting the bounding boxes placed around them. This leads us to four conclusions: First, size and shape constancy do not affect our visual experience (the perceived angular size of objects), but merely our judgment of their perceived angular size. Second, size and shape constancy become important paradigms for understanding just how low-level, and automatic, involuntary, and resistant to revision, ‘cognition’ can be. It also provides a clear demonstration of how ‘cognition’ can be mistaken for ‘perception’. Third, since size constancy is thought to rely on feedback processing to the Primary Visual Cortex (V1), we conclude that top-down processing to V1 is ‘cognitive’ rather than ‘perceptual’ (Linton, 2021, Neurosci. Conscious., 2 niab017). Fourth, this suggests that feedforward (rather than feedback) V1 must be the site for the neural correlates of visual experience.
Center for Open Science
Title: Size and Shape Constancy are Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Size Constancy Illusion and Linton Shape Constancy Illusion
Description:
We present two new illusions that challenges our understanding of size and shape constancy, with implications for how we should think about feedback to the primary visual cortex (V1), the perception/cognition distinction, and the neural correlates of visual experience.
Size constancy is traditionally thought to affect the perceived angular (2D) size of objects (Murray et al.
, 2006, Nat.
Neurosci.
9 429-434).
Indeed, observers are often surprised to find that size constancy stimuli are the same size in image pixels.
This affect is now typically attributed to feedback to the primary visual cortex (V1) (Ni et al.
, 2015, Curr.
Biol.
, 24(14) 1653-1658).
A similar claim has been made about shape constancy (Thouless, 1931, Brit.
J.
Psych.
, 21 339-359).
However, if size and shape constancy really do affect perceived angular (2D) size, then any rectangular frame placed in the same 2D region of the image should also be equally distorted.
However, this is not what we find.
Instead, pictorial size constancy, stereo size constancy, and stereo shape constancy all persist without distorting the bounding boxes placed around them.
This leads us to four conclusions: First, size and shape constancy do not affect our visual experience (the perceived angular size of objects), but merely our judgment of their perceived angular size.
Second, size and shape constancy become important paradigms for understanding just how low-level, and automatic, involuntary, and resistant to revision, ‘cognition’ can be.
It also provides a clear demonstration of how ‘cognition’ can be mistaken for ‘perception’.
Third, since size constancy is thought to rely on feedback processing to the Primary Visual Cortex (V1), we conclude that top-down processing to V1 is ‘cognitive’ rather than ‘perceptual’ (Linton, 2021, Neurosci.
Conscious.
, 2 niab017).
Fourth, this suggests that feedforward (rather than feedback) V1 must be the site for the neural correlates of visual experience.

Related Results

On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background:#f9f9f4"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><b><spa...
Hubungan Perilaku Pola Makan dengan Kejadian Anak Obesitas
Hubungan Perilaku Pola Makan dengan Kejadian Anak Obesitas
<p><em><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-langua...
Depth Cue Integration is Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Un-Hollow Face Illusion and Linton Morphing Face Illusion
Depth Cue Integration is Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Un-Hollow Face Illusion and Linton Morphing Face Illusion
We present two new versions of the Hollow Face Illusion that challenge our understanding of depth cue integration. Traditional accounts of depth cue integration operate at the leve...
Depth Cue Integration is Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Un-Hollow Face Illusion and Linton Morphing Face Illusion
Depth Cue Integration is Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Un-Hollow Face Illusion and Linton Morphing Face Illusion
We present two new versions of the Hollow Face Illusion that challenge our understanding of depth cue integration. Traditional accounts of depth cue integration operate at the leve...
Size and Shape Constancies Do Not Affect Perceived Angular Size: Linton Size Constancy and Shape Constancy Illusions
Size and Shape Constancies Do Not Affect Perceived Angular Size: Linton Size Constancy and Shape Constancy Illusions
We present three new illusions that challenge our understanding of shape and size constancies. Traditional accounts of size constancy suggest that it distorts the perceived angular...
Linton Stereo Illusion: Response on Johnston (1991)
Linton Stereo Illusion: Response on Johnston (1991)
In (Linton, 2024) I present a new illusion (the ‘Linton Stereo Illusion’) that challenges our understanding of stereo vision. A vision scientist has shared their own analysis of th...
Changes in intentional binding effect during a novel perceptual-motor task
Changes in intentional binding effect during a novel perceptual-motor task
Perceptual-motor learning describes the process of improving the smoothness and accuracy of movements. Intentional binding (IB) is a phenomenon whereby the length of time between p...
Midlife Marital Status and Subsequent Cognitive Decline over 20 Years: Discovery from ARIC
Midlife Marital Status and Subsequent Cognitive Decline over 20 Years: Discovery from ARIC
Background — Recent studies show that marriage is associated with a protective effect against cognitive decline among older adults. However, definite evidence from large prospectiv...

Back to Top