Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Linton Scale Illusion
View through CrossRef
We present a new illusion that challenges our understanding of visual scale. Since Helmholtz’s ‘telestereoscope’ (1857), we’ve known that stereo vision governs visual scale, turning a real-world scene into a miniature scene despite all other depth cues being present. This effect is attributed to vergence and/or vertical disparities (Howard & Rogers, 2012). By contrast, Linton (2018) BioRxiv, attributes the effect to horizontal disparities. To adjudicate between these two accounts, we build a virtual reality ‘telestereoscope’ that can decouple changes in vergence and vertical disparity from changes in horizontal disparity. First, when horizontal disparity is ramped-up, but vergence and vertical disparity are normal, the scene looks miniature. This is an astounding effect, given all other distance cues indicate a normal scene. Second, when vergence and vertical disparity are ramped-up, but horizontal disparity is normal, the scene looks normal, challenging the role that vergence and vertical disparity play in visual scale. Third, ramping-up horizontal disparity also changes the slope of the ground-plane. Fourth, keeping vergence and vertical disparity fixed whilst ramping-up horizontal disparity creates a startling illusion. We judge the scene as a whole to reduce in scale, even though all that changes in our visual experience is a distortion of 3D shape (of the scene and its objects). The illusion changes our concept of ‘visual scale’ from being something that we directly perceive (vision having a range-finder, like vergence or vertical disparity) to something we merely cognitively infer on the basis of an association between accentuated 3D shape and closer distances.
Title: Linton Scale Illusion
Description:
We present a new illusion that challenges our understanding of visual scale.
Since Helmholtz’s ‘telestereoscope’ (1857), we’ve known that stereo vision governs visual scale, turning a real-world scene into a miniature scene despite all other depth cues being present.
This effect is attributed to vergence and/or vertical disparities (Howard & Rogers, 2012).
By contrast, Linton (2018) BioRxiv, attributes the effect to horizontal disparities.
To adjudicate between these two accounts, we build a virtual reality ‘telestereoscope’ that can decouple changes in vergence and vertical disparity from changes in horizontal disparity.
First, when horizontal disparity is ramped-up, but vergence and vertical disparity are normal, the scene looks miniature.
This is an astounding effect, given all other distance cues indicate a normal scene.
Second, when vergence and vertical disparity are ramped-up, but horizontal disparity is normal, the scene looks normal, challenging the role that vergence and vertical disparity play in visual scale.
Third, ramping-up horizontal disparity also changes the slope of the ground-plane.
Fourth, keeping vergence and vertical disparity fixed whilst ramping-up horizontal disparity creates a startling illusion.
We judge the scene as a whole to reduce in scale, even though all that changes in our visual experience is a distortion of 3D shape (of the scene and its objects).
The illusion changes our concept of ‘visual scale’ from being something that we directly perceive (vision having a range-finder, like vergence or vertical disparity) to something we merely cognitively infer on the basis of an association between accentuated 3D shape and closer distances.
Related Results
Depth Cue Integration is Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Un-Hollow Face Illusion and Linton Morphing Face Illusion
Depth Cue Integration is Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Un-Hollow Face Illusion and Linton Morphing Face Illusion
We present two new versions of the Hollow Face Illusion that challenge our understanding of depth cue integration. Traditional accounts of depth cue integration operate at the leve...
Depth Cue Integration is Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Un-Hollow Face Illusion and Linton Morphing Face Illusion
Depth Cue Integration is Cognitive Rather than Perceptual: Linton Un-Hollow Face Illusion and Linton Morphing Face Illusion
We present two new versions of the Hollow Face Illusion that challenge our understanding of depth cue integration. Traditional accounts of depth cue integration operate at the leve...
Linton Stereo Illusion: Response on Johnston (1991)
Linton Stereo Illusion: Response on Johnston (1991)
In (Linton, 2024) I present a new illusion (the ‘Linton Stereo Illusion’) that challenges our understanding of stereo vision. A vision scientist has shared their own analysis of th...
Visual Scale is Governed by Horizontal Disparities: Linton Scale Illusion
Visual Scale is Governed by Horizontal Disparities: Linton Scale Illusion
We present a new illusion that challenges our understanding of visual scale. Since Helmholtz’s ‘telestereoscope’ (1857), we’ve known that stereo vision governs visual scale, turnin...
Visual Scale is Governed by Horizontal Disparities: Linton Scale Illusion
Visual Scale is Governed by Horizontal Disparities: Linton Scale Illusion
We present a new illusion that challenges our understanding of visual scale. Since Helmholtz’s ‘telestereoscope’ (1857), we’ve known that stereo vision governs visual scale, turnin...
Configural Processing Hypothesis and Face-Inversion Effect
Configural Processing Hypothesis and Face-Inversion Effect
Perception and recognition of faces presented upright are better than Perception and recognition of faces presented inverted. The difference between upright and inverted orientatio...
A static paradigm based on illusion-induced VEP for brain-computer interfaces
A static paradigm based on illusion-induced VEP for brain-computer interfaces
Abstract
Objective. Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) have been commonly applied in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) due to their satisfactory class...
Linton Stereo Illusion
Linton Stereo Illusion
We present a new illusion that challenges our understanding of stereo vision. The illusion consists of a larger circle at 50cm, and smaller circle in front of it at 40cm, with cons...


