Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Male and female bees show large differences in floral preference
View through CrossRef
AbstractIntraspecific variation in foraging niche can drive food web dynamics and ecosystem processes. Field studies and theoretical analysis of plant-pollinator interaction networks typically focus on the partitioning of the floral community between pollinator species, with little attention paid to intraspecific variation among plants or foraging bees. In other systems, male and female animals exhibit different, cascading, impacts on interaction partners. Although the foraging ecology of male bees is little known, we expect foraging preferences to differ between male and female bees, which could strongly impact plant-pollinator interaction outcomes.We designed an observational study to evaluate the strength and prevalence of sexually dimorphic foraging preferences in bees.We observed bees visiting flowers in semi-natural meadows in New Jersey, USA. To detect differences in flower use against a shared background resource availability, we maximized the number of interactions observed within narrow spatio-temporal windows. To distinguish observed differences in bee use of flower species, which can reflect abundance patterns and sampling effects, from underlying differences in bee preferences, we analyzed our data with both a permutation-based null model and random effects models.We found that the diets of male and female bees of the same species were often as dissimilar as the diets of bees of different species. Furthermore, we demonstrate differences in preference between male and female bees, and identify plant species that are particularly attractive to each sex. We show that intraspecific differences in preference can be robustly identified within interactions between hundreds of species, without precisely quantifying resource availability, and despite high phenological turnover.Given the large differences in flower use and preference between male and female bees, ecological sex differences should be integrated into studies of bee demography, plant pollination, and coevolutionary relationships between flowers and insects.
Title: Male and female bees show large differences in floral preference
Description:
AbstractIntraspecific variation in foraging niche can drive food web dynamics and ecosystem processes.
Field studies and theoretical analysis of plant-pollinator interaction networks typically focus on the partitioning of the floral community between pollinator species, with little attention paid to intraspecific variation among plants or foraging bees.
In other systems, male and female animals exhibit different, cascading, impacts on interaction partners.
Although the foraging ecology of male bees is little known, we expect foraging preferences to differ between male and female bees, which could strongly impact plant-pollinator interaction outcomes.
We designed an observational study to evaluate the strength and prevalence of sexually dimorphic foraging preferences in bees.
We observed bees visiting flowers in semi-natural meadows in New Jersey, USA.
To detect differences in flower use against a shared background resource availability, we maximized the number of interactions observed within narrow spatio-temporal windows.
To distinguish observed differences in bee use of flower species, which can reflect abundance patterns and sampling effects, from underlying differences in bee preferences, we analyzed our data with both a permutation-based null model and random effects models.
We found that the diets of male and female bees of the same species were often as dissimilar as the diets of bees of different species.
Furthermore, we demonstrate differences in preference between male and female bees, and identify plant species that are particularly attractive to each sex.
We show that intraspecific differences in preference can be robustly identified within interactions between hundreds of species, without precisely quantifying resource availability, and despite high phenological turnover.
Given the large differences in flower use and preference between male and female bees, ecological sex differences should be integrated into studies of bee demography, plant pollination, and coevolutionary relationships between flowers and insects.
Related Results
Red mason bees cannot compete with honey bees for floral resources in a cage experiment
Red mason bees cannot compete with honey bees for floral resources in a cage experiment
AbstractIntensive beekeeping to mitigate crop pollination deficits and habitat loss may cause interspecific competition between bees. Studies show negative correlations between flo...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED]Rhino XL Reviews, NY USA: Studies show that testosterone levels in males decrease constantly with growing age. There are also many other problems that males face due ...
Patch Size, Pollinator Behavior, and Pollinator Limitation in Catnip
Patch Size, Pollinator Behavior, and Pollinator Limitation in Catnip
We examined the effects of the patch size of catnip, Nepeta cataria, on pollinator visitation rates and pollinator limitation. The most important floral visitors were honey bees (A...
Pollination ecology of Brownlowia tersa (Malvaceae), a Near Threatened non-viviparous true mangrove shrub
Pollination ecology of Brownlowia tersa (Malvaceae), a Near Threatened non-viviparous true mangrove shrub
Brownlowia tersa is a low-ground semi-evergreen shrub species. The phenological events occur sequentially—leaf fall, leaf flushing, flowering and fruiting from April to November. ...
Use of Bee-Borne Attractants for Pollination of Nonrewarding Flowers: Model System of Male-Sterile Tomato Flowers
Use of Bee-Borne Attractants for Pollination of Nonrewarding Flowers: Model System of Male-Sterile Tomato Flowers
The use of bee natural product for enhancing pollination is especially valuable in problematic crops that are generally avoided by bees. In the present research we attempted to enh...
Tissue-specific transcriptional patterns underlie seasonal phenotypes in honey bees (Apis mellifera)
Tissue-specific transcriptional patterns underlie seasonal phenotypes in honey bees (Apis mellifera)
Faced with adverse conditions, such as winter in temperate regions or
hot and dry conditions in tropical regions, many insect species enter a
state of diapause, a period of dormanc...
Tissue-specific transcriptional patterns underlie seasonal phenotypes in honey bees (Apis mellifera)
Tissue-specific transcriptional patterns underlie seasonal phenotypes in honey bees (Apis mellifera)
Faced with adverse conditions, such as winter in temperate regions or
hot and dry conditions in tropical regions, many insect species enter a
state of diapause, a period of dormanc...

