Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Institutional Differences in Carotid Artery Duplex Diagnostic Criteria Result in Significant Variability in Classification of Carotid Artery Stenoses and Likely Lead to Disparities in Care
View through CrossRef
Background—
The indications for carotid revascularization are based almost exclusively on the results of carotid duplex ultrasonography. Noninvasive vascular laboratories show large variation in the diagnostic criteria used to classify degree of carotid artery stenosis. We hypothesize that variability of these diagnostic criteria causes significant variation in stenosis classification directly affecting the number of revascularizations and associated costs.
Methods and Results—
The diagnostic criteria to interpret carotid duplex ultrasounds were obtained from 10 New England institutions. All carotid duplex scans performed at our institution were reviewed from 2008 to 2012. Using the diagnostic criteria from each institution, the degree of stenosis that would have been reported was classified as 70% to 99% asymptomatic, 80% to 99% asymptomatic, and 50% to 99% symptomatic. We then calculated the theoretical number of carotid revascularization procedures that this cohort would be offered using each institution’s diagnostic criteria and the costs of these procedures based on reimbursement rates. Among 10 614 patients who underwent 15 534 carotid duplex scans, 31 025 arteries were reviewed. Application of the 10 institutions’ criteria to the patients from our institution yielded marked variation in the number classified as 70% to 99% asymptomatic (range, 186–2201), 80% to 99% asymptomatic (range, 78–426), and 50% to 99% symptomatic (range, 157–781). If revascularizations were based on these results, costs would range from $2.2 to $26 million, $0.9 to $5.0 million, and $1.9 to $9.2 million, respectively.
Conclusions—
Differences in diagnostic criteria to interpret carotid ultrasound result in significant variation in classification of carotid artery stenosis, likely leading to differences in the number and subsequent costs of revascularizations. This theoretical model highlights the need for standardization of carotid duplex criteria.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Institutional Differences in Carotid Artery Duplex Diagnostic Criteria Result in Significant Variability in Classification of Carotid Artery Stenoses and Likely Lead to Disparities in Care
Description:
Background—
The indications for carotid revascularization are based almost exclusively on the results of carotid duplex ultrasonography.
Noninvasive vascular laboratories show large variation in the diagnostic criteria used to classify degree of carotid artery stenosis.
We hypothesize that variability of these diagnostic criteria causes significant variation in stenosis classification directly affecting the number of revascularizations and associated costs.
Methods and Results—
The diagnostic criteria to interpret carotid duplex ultrasounds were obtained from 10 New England institutions.
All carotid duplex scans performed at our institution were reviewed from 2008 to 2012.
Using the diagnostic criteria from each institution, the degree of stenosis that would have been reported was classified as 70% to 99% asymptomatic, 80% to 99% asymptomatic, and 50% to 99% symptomatic.
We then calculated the theoretical number of carotid revascularization procedures that this cohort would be offered using each institution’s diagnostic criteria and the costs of these procedures based on reimbursement rates.
Among 10 614 patients who underwent 15 534 carotid duplex scans, 31 025 arteries were reviewed.
Application of the 10 institutions’ criteria to the patients from our institution yielded marked variation in the number classified as 70% to 99% asymptomatic (range, 186–2201), 80% to 99% asymptomatic (range, 78–426), and 50% to 99% symptomatic (range, 157–781).
If revascularizations were based on these results, costs would range from $2.
2 to $26 million, $0.
9 to $5.
0 million, and $1.
9 to $9.
2 million, respectively.
Conclusions—
Differences in diagnostic criteria to interpret carotid ultrasound result in significant variation in classification of carotid artery stenosis, likely leading to differences in the number and subsequent costs of revascularizations.
This theoretical model highlights the need for standardization of carotid duplex criteria.
Related Results
Correlation Between Carotid Plaque Location And Carotid Blood Flow Dynamics
Correlation Between Carotid Plaque Location And Carotid Blood Flow Dynamics
Abstract
Purpose: This study was aimed to investigate the influence of carotid hemodynamics in common carotid artery (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) on carotid plaq...
Joint Full-Duplex/Half-Duplex Transmission-Switching Scheduling and Transmission-Energy Allocation in Cognitive Radio Networks with Energy Harvesting
Joint Full-Duplex/Half-Duplex Transmission-Switching Scheduling and Transmission-Energy Allocation in Cognitive Radio Networks with Energy Harvesting
The full-duplex transmission protocol has been widely investigated in the literature in order to improve radio spectrum usage efficiency. Unfortunately, due to the effect of imperf...
Determinants of Cerebrovascular Reserve in Patients with Significant Carotid Stenosis
Determinants of Cerebrovascular Reserve in Patients with Significant Carotid Stenosis
Abstract
Introduction
In patients with 70% to 99% diameter carotid artery stenosis cerebral blood flow reserve may be protectiv...
CORRELATION STUDY OF CAROTID ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND SERUM HIGH SENSITIVITY C-REACTIVE PROTEIN LEVELS IN ELDERLY HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
CORRELATION STUDY OF CAROTID ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND SERUM HIGH SENSITIVITY C-REACTIVE PROTEIN LEVELS IN ELDERLY HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
Objectives
To investigate the correlation of carotid atherosclerosis and serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in elderly hypertensive patients
...
A Preliminary Study of Wall Shear Stress in Carotid Artery Stenting
A Preliminary Study of Wall Shear Stress in Carotid Artery Stenting
Abstract
Objective: To characterize carotid wall shear stress (WSS)following carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with carotid stenosis.
Methods: Twenty-eight patient...
Blood Flow Acoustics in Carotid Artery
Blood Flow Acoustics in Carotid Artery
This paper aims to identify and study the blood flow and acoustics characteristics of different degrees of stenosis in the carotid artery. Blood flow will produce acoustics, but th...
Subclinical arterial stiffness in prehypertensives
Subclinical arterial stiffness in prehypertensives
Objective
To assess the difference of arterial stiffness in prehypertensive subjects in comparison to normotensive subjects.
...
Stenting of ultraembolic hazardous carotid stenotic lesions using the technique of triple antiembolic protection
Stenting of ultraembolic hazardous carotid stenotic lesions using the technique of triple antiembolic protection
Objective ‒ to develop a technique of triple antiembolic protection with the simultaneous use of proximal antiembolic protection systems, distal antiembolic filters and two-layer m...

