Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Institutional Differences in Carotid Artery Duplex Diagnostic Criteria Result in Significant Variability in Classification of Carotid Artery Stenoses and Likely Lead to Disparities in Care

View through CrossRef
Background— The indications for carotid revascularization are based almost exclusively on the results of carotid duplex ultrasonography. Noninvasive vascular laboratories show large variation in the diagnostic criteria used to classify degree of carotid artery stenosis. We hypothesize that variability of these diagnostic criteria causes significant variation in stenosis classification directly affecting the number of revascularizations and associated costs. Methods and Results— The diagnostic criteria to interpret carotid duplex ultrasounds were obtained from 10 New England institutions. All carotid duplex scans performed at our institution were reviewed from 2008 to 2012. Using the diagnostic criteria from each institution, the degree of stenosis that would have been reported was classified as 70% to 99% asymptomatic, 80% to 99% asymptomatic, and 50% to 99% symptomatic. We then calculated the theoretical number of carotid revascularization procedures that this cohort would be offered using each institution’s diagnostic criteria and the costs of these procedures based on reimbursement rates. Among 10 614 patients who underwent 15 534 carotid duplex scans, 31 025 arteries were reviewed. Application of the 10 institutions’ criteria to the patients from our institution yielded marked variation in the number classified as 70% to 99% asymptomatic (range, 186–2201), 80% to 99% asymptomatic (range, 78–426), and 50% to 99% symptomatic (range, 157–781). If revascularizations were based on these results, costs would range from $2.2 to $26 million, $0.9 to $5.0 million, and $1.9 to $9.2 million, respectively. Conclusions— Differences in diagnostic criteria to interpret carotid ultrasound result in significant variation in classification of carotid artery stenosis, likely leading to differences in the number and subsequent costs of revascularizations. This theoretical model highlights the need for standardization of carotid duplex criteria.
Title: Institutional Differences in Carotid Artery Duplex Diagnostic Criteria Result in Significant Variability in Classification of Carotid Artery Stenoses and Likely Lead to Disparities in Care
Description:
Background— The indications for carotid revascularization are based almost exclusively on the results of carotid duplex ultrasonography.
Noninvasive vascular laboratories show large variation in the diagnostic criteria used to classify degree of carotid artery stenosis.
We hypothesize that variability of these diagnostic criteria causes significant variation in stenosis classification directly affecting the number of revascularizations and associated costs.
Methods and Results— The diagnostic criteria to interpret carotid duplex ultrasounds were obtained from 10 New England institutions.
All carotid duplex scans performed at our institution were reviewed from 2008 to 2012.
Using the diagnostic criteria from each institution, the degree of stenosis that would have been reported was classified as 70% to 99% asymptomatic, 80% to 99% asymptomatic, and 50% to 99% symptomatic.
We then calculated the theoretical number of carotid revascularization procedures that this cohort would be offered using each institution’s diagnostic criteria and the costs of these procedures based on reimbursement rates.
Among 10 614 patients who underwent 15 534 carotid duplex scans, 31 025 arteries were reviewed.
Application of the 10 institutions’ criteria to the patients from our institution yielded marked variation in the number classified as 70% to 99% asymptomatic (range, 186–2201), 80% to 99% asymptomatic (range, 78–426), and 50% to 99% symptomatic (range, 157–781).
If revascularizations were based on these results, costs would range from $2.
2 to $26 million, $0.
9 to $5.
0 million, and $1.
9 to $9.
2 million, respectively.
Conclusions— Differences in diagnostic criteria to interpret carotid ultrasound result in significant variation in classification of carotid artery stenosis, likely leading to differences in the number and subsequent costs of revascularizations.
This theoretical model highlights the need for standardization of carotid duplex criteria.

Related Results

Correlation Between Carotid Plaque Location And Carotid Blood Flow Dynamics
Correlation Between Carotid Plaque Location And Carotid Blood Flow Dynamics
Abstract Purpose: This study was aimed to investigate the influence of carotid hemodynamics in common carotid artery (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) on carotid plaq...
Determinants of Cerebrovascular Reserve in Patients with Significant Carotid Stenosis
Determinants of Cerebrovascular Reserve in Patients with Significant Carotid Stenosis
Abstract Introduction In patients with 70% to 99% diameter carotid artery stenosis cerebral blood flow reserve may be protectiv...
A Preliminary Study of Wall Shear Stress in Carotid Artery Stenting
A Preliminary Study of Wall Shear Stress in Carotid Artery Stenting
Abstract Objective: To characterize carotid wall shear stress (WSS)following carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with carotid stenosis. Methods: Twenty-eight patient...
Blood Flow Acoustics in Carotid Artery
Blood Flow Acoustics in Carotid Artery
This paper aims to identify and study the blood flow and acoustics characteristics of different degrees of stenosis in the carotid artery. Blood flow will produce acoustics, but th...
Subclinical arterial stiffness in prehypertensives
Subclinical arterial stiffness in prehypertensives
Objective To assess the difference of arterial stiffness in prehypertensive subjects in comparison to normotensive subjects. ...
Stenting of ultraembolic hazardous carotid stenotic lesions using the technique of triple antiembolic protection
Stenting of ultraembolic hazardous carotid stenotic lesions using the technique of triple antiembolic protection
Objective ‒ to develop a technique of triple antiembolic protection with the simultaneous use of proximal antiembolic protection systems, distal antiembolic filters and two-layer m...

Back to Top