Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Rajput Kingship

View through CrossRef
The term Rajput kingship designates the sociocultural ideals and practices that inform sovereignty among the erstwhile kingdoms of northern India. Originating from the mixture of South Asian peasant societies and Central Asian invaders in the second half of the 1st millennium ce, the Rajputs (literally, “sons of kings”) propagated a composite image of sovereignty that conjoined the autochthonous beliefs of agro-pastoralists with Brahmanical (Sanskritic) mores. By the early modern era, Rajput kingship came to be embodied in the image of the heroic warrior-king. This ideal manifested in martial valor, attachment to territory, fidelity to kin and allies, and was epitomized through the notion of self-sacrifice. Having played an integral part in the administration of the Mughal Empire, Rajput rulers adopted additional tastes and customs from the Persian cosmopolis. The consolidation of Rajput kingship in the modern era saw the assimilation of local rulers into the framework of the British Indian Empire as autonomous subjects, becoming the emblematic icons of Indian kingship familiar today.
Title: Rajput Kingship
Description:
The term Rajput kingship designates the sociocultural ideals and practices that inform sovereignty among the erstwhile kingdoms of northern India.
Originating from the mixture of South Asian peasant societies and Central Asian invaders in the second half of the 1st millennium ce, the Rajputs (literally, “sons of kings”) propagated a composite image of sovereignty that conjoined the autochthonous beliefs of agro-pastoralists with Brahmanical (Sanskritic) mores.
By the early modern era, Rajput kingship came to be embodied in the image of the heroic warrior-king.
This ideal manifested in martial valor, attachment to territory, fidelity to kin and allies, and was epitomized through the notion of self-sacrifice.
Having played an integral part in the administration of the Mughal Empire, Rajput rulers adopted additional tastes and customs from the Persian cosmopolis.
The consolidation of Rajput kingship in the modern era saw the assimilation of local rulers into the framework of the British Indian Empire as autonomous subjects, becoming the emblematic icons of Indian kingship familiar today.

Related Results

Kāyam Khā̃ Rāso and Image of Muslim Rajput Rulers
Kāyam Khā̃ Rāso and Image of Muslim Rajput Rulers
The article aims to analyse Kāyam Khā̃ Rāso and to contextualize it against the interplay of cultural influences in early modern India. While earlier research showcased that Jān ch...
Management and Investigation of Drug Utilization Case behind the Death of Bollywood Actor Sushant Singh Rajput
Management and Investigation of Drug Utilization Case behind the Death of Bollywood Actor Sushant Singh Rajput
On 14 June 2020, Indian actor Sushant Singh Rajput was found dead hanging from the ceiling fan at his home in Bandra, Mumbai, with the cause ruled assuicide. The official postmorte...
“Cyrus appeared both great and good”
“Cyrus appeared both great and good”
In this chapter, Atack argues that Xenophon’s depiction of the performance of kingship by Cyrus (Cyropaedia), Agesilaus (Hellenica, Agesilaus), and other kings contains an evaluati...
The Destruction of Achaemenid Persia and the Creation of Seleucid Iran
The Destruction of Achaemenid Persia and the Creation of Seleucid Iran
Chapter 3 offer a new approach to the evidence that takes into account not just continuities with Persian practice, but also the Seleucid Empire’s breaks with Achaemenid traditions...
A Pathology of Sacral Kingship: Putrefaction in the Body of Charles Xi of Sweden
A Pathology of Sacral Kingship: Putrefaction in the Body of Charles Xi of Sweden
Abstract This article uses the ailing body of King Charles XI of Sweden (1655–97) to explore how the king’s physicality was intimately connected not only with the na...
Die Unterdrückung von Uruk: Einwände gegen die Deutung als „mythical history“
Die Unterdrückung von Uruk: Einwände gegen die Deutung als „mythical history“
AbstractIn this article the thesis is defended that the mythical tales about Gilgameš and other heroes of the past, are not concerned with telling or evaluating history, but that f...
The Ptolemies
The Ptolemies
Abstract This article explores the character(s) of Ptolemaic kingship in Egypt. A special focus is placed on the legitimation of kingship and the different forms ...
1 Henry IV : Nation and Self Divided
1 Henry IV : Nation and Self Divided
The next history play in the sequence of four, 1 Henry IV, dramatizes how the demystification of kingship in Richard II has fragmented the nation into rival camps, each with dubiou...

Back to Top