Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abstract 687: Implementation of inter-patient variability in semi-mechanistic model of melanoma treatment with vemurafenib

View through CrossRef
Abstract Introduction: The number of parameters in quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP), mechanistic and semi-mechanistic models is greater than in conventional PK/PD models. That is why it is not possible to implement inter-patient variability using only clinical data. The objective of this study was to describe inter-patient variability in the semi-mechanistic model of melanoma treatment with vemurafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, on the basis of published human in vitro, in vivo and clinical data, and to predict overall response from phase 2 clinical trial. Methods: Model described melanoma progression and its treatment with vemurafenib. It includes (i) proliferation, apoptosis, and transition between states (c-MET negative/positive and sensitive/resistant to BRAF inhibitor) of cancer cells; (ii) HGF effect on proliferation of melanoma cells; (iii) PK/PD of vemurafenib. Various types of data were used to extract inter-patient variability, for example: (a) in vitro data on effect of vemurafenib on melanoma cell lines [1]; (b) in vivo data on tumor growth in melanoma patients without treatment [2]; (c) in vivo data on HGF level in blood plasma of melanoma patients [3]. Results: Different virtual patients developed by the model reproduce all types of tumor response to vemurafenib monotherapy according to RECIST criteria: complete response, partial response, stable disease and progressive disease. To evaluate the predictive ability of the model in a quantitative manner we compared results of simulation of virtual patients population with clinical outcomes. An overall response rate was 70% in the model versus 53% (95% CI, 44 to 62) observed in phase 2 clinical trial [4]. Overestimation can be explained by intermittent administration and dose reduction in case of adverse events in clinical trials which were not taken into account in the model. Conclusions: Our work establishes the benefit of using of in vitro and in vivo data in addition to clinical data to predict the variability in treatment outcomes of cancer patients. [1] Stones et al. Front Genet. 2013 May 8;4:66 [2] Hartung et al. PLoS One. 2017 May 4;12(5):e0176080 [3] Hügel et al. Melanoma Res. 2016 Aug;26(4):354-60 [4] Sosman et al. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):707-14 Citation Format: Dmitry Shchelokov, Oleg Demin Jr, Oleg Demin. Implementation of inter-patient variability in semi-mechanistic model of melanoma treatment with vemurafenib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 687.
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Title: Abstract 687: Implementation of inter-patient variability in semi-mechanistic model of melanoma treatment with vemurafenib
Description:
Abstract Introduction: The number of parameters in quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP), mechanistic and semi-mechanistic models is greater than in conventional PK/PD models.
That is why it is not possible to implement inter-patient variability using only clinical data.
The objective of this study was to describe inter-patient variability in the semi-mechanistic model of melanoma treatment with vemurafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, on the basis of published human in vitro, in vivo and clinical data, and to predict overall response from phase 2 clinical trial.
Methods: Model described melanoma progression and its treatment with vemurafenib.
It includes (i) proliferation, apoptosis, and transition between states (c-MET negative/positive and sensitive/resistant to BRAF inhibitor) of cancer cells; (ii) HGF effect on proliferation of melanoma cells; (iii) PK/PD of vemurafenib.
Various types of data were used to extract inter-patient variability, for example: (a) in vitro data on effect of vemurafenib on melanoma cell lines [1]; (b) in vivo data on tumor growth in melanoma patients without treatment [2]; (c) in vivo data on HGF level in blood plasma of melanoma patients [3].
Results: Different virtual patients developed by the model reproduce all types of tumor response to vemurafenib monotherapy according to RECIST criteria: complete response, partial response, stable disease and progressive disease.
To evaluate the predictive ability of the model in a quantitative manner we compared results of simulation of virtual patients population with clinical outcomes.
An overall response rate was 70% in the model versus 53% (95% CI, 44 to 62) observed in phase 2 clinical trial [4].
Overestimation can be explained by intermittent administration and dose reduction in case of adverse events in clinical trials which were not taken into account in the model.
Conclusions: Our work establishes the benefit of using of in vitro and in vivo data in addition to clinical data to predict the variability in treatment outcomes of cancer patients.
[1] Stones et al.
Front Genet.
2013 May 8;4:66 [2] Hartung et al.
PLoS One.
2017 May 4;12(5):e0176080 [3] Hügel et al.
Melanoma Res.
2016 Aug;26(4):354-60 [4] Sosman et al.
N Engl J Med.
2012 Feb 23;366(8):707-14 Citation Format: Dmitry Shchelokov, Oleg Demin Jr, Oleg Demin.
Implementation of inter-patient variability in semi-mechanistic model of melanoma treatment with vemurafenib [abstract].
In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 687.

Related Results

Targeting PEAK1 sensitizes anaplastic thyroid carcinoma 8505C cells to BRAFV600E inhibitor Vemurafenib in vitro
Targeting PEAK1 sensitizes anaplastic thyroid carcinoma 8505C cells to BRAFV600E inhibitor Vemurafenib in vitro
Vemurafenib, one of the selective BRAF inhibitor, is less effective in BRAF-mutant thyroid cancer, including anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), the mechanisms of which are still lack...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition with Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib for Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition with Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib for Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Acquired resistance is the most common cause of BRAF inhibitor monotherapy treatment failure, with the majority of patients experiencing disease progression with a median progressi...
Precursors of skin melanoma (melanoma-sensitive nevi)
Precursors of skin melanoma (melanoma-sensitive nevi)
Interest in melanoma precursors, or melanoma-sensitive skin nevi, has not lost its relevance for many years due to the steady increase of skin melanoma morbidity in recent decades ...
Abstract 1631: Cav1 is a key mediator of tumor-stromal interactions in melanoma.
Abstract 1631: Cav1 is a key mediator of tumor-stromal interactions in melanoma.
Abstract Several lines of experimental evidence have demonstrated the importance of the tumor microenvironment in controlling melanoma tumor growth and melanoma meta...
YY1-induced lncRNA00511 promotes melanoma progression via the miR-150- 5p/ADAM19 axis
YY1-induced lncRNA00511 promotes melanoma progression via the miR-150- 5p/ADAM19 axis
Abstract Background Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are key regulators of oncogenic processes, and one such lncRNA is lncRNA511 (LINC00511), which is associated with breast,...
Pivotal factors associated with the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and melanoma metastasis
Pivotal factors associated with the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and melanoma metastasis
AbstractBackgroundConsidering melanoma is the deadliest malignancy among dermatoma and presently lacks effective therapies, there is an urgent need to investigate the potential mec...

Back to Top