Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Ancient Egyptian Warfare (3000 BCE–332 BCE)

View through CrossRef
The culture of Egyptian history spans millennia. Hence, we can see major changes (developments, innovations, borrowings from abroad) as well as the persistence of organizational stability. Add to this the slow growth in corporate identity of the state’s army as well as its technological changes. The latter is most clearly revealed in the use of horses for the elite segment of the pharaonic army in the New Kingdom, the chariotry. It was roughly around the same time that the Egyptians had an independent army, whereas earlier such had not been the case. The war materiel, especially axes and maceheads in fighting, had slowly but effectively been replaced by the use of more effective swords—note the advance through the sickle-shaped types—and shields. Then, too, the introduction of bronze technology in the late third millennium bce had effectively altered the earlier reliance upon stone and copper. During the Middle Kingdom (c. 2008 bce–1775 bce), massive fortress building took place at the Second Cataract in the south in Nubia. Furthermore, permanent military duty was established and some type of cursus honorum for high-ranking soldiers is discernible. Egyptian history is separated into unified periods, called Kingdoms, from those in between when disunity was prevalent and warfare frequent. The latter eras are called Intermediate Periods. This bibliography commences with Dynasties I and II, often called the Early State, and then follows on to the fully developed archaic state of the Old Kingdom, covering Dynasties III–VIII. Subsequent is the First Intermediate Period, which ended with the second unification of the Middle Kingdom (Dynasties XII–XIII). The Second Intermediate Period comes afterward, to be succeeded in turn by the New Kingdom (Dynasties XVIII–XX). That was the era of Egypt’s great empire in Asia (Palestine especially, but also southern Syria) and Nubia in the south up to the Fourth Cataract. A third period of disunity then occurred (Dynasties XXI–XXV). The Saite Period of Dynasty XXVI (664 bce–525 bce) is often recognized as the final epoch of a strong independent Egypt. But due to outside invasions, the Egyptians of the Delta came to rely upon northern Ionian mercenaries. This is particularly evident during the reign of the first Saite ruler, Psammetichus I (664 bce–610 bce), but became stable thereafter. Then came the domination of Persia, which, despite some independent royal houses, effectively concludes the history owing to Alexander the Great’s invasion of Egypt in 332 bce.
Oxford University Press
Title: Ancient Egyptian Warfare (3000 BCE–332 BCE)
Description:
The culture of Egyptian history spans millennia.
Hence, we can see major changes (developments, innovations, borrowings from abroad) as well as the persistence of organizational stability.
Add to this the slow growth in corporate identity of the state’s army as well as its technological changes.
The latter is most clearly revealed in the use of horses for the elite segment of the pharaonic army in the New Kingdom, the chariotry.
It was roughly around the same time that the Egyptians had an independent army, whereas earlier such had not been the case.
The war materiel, especially axes and maceheads in fighting, had slowly but effectively been replaced by the use of more effective swords—note the advance through the sickle-shaped types—and shields.
Then, too, the introduction of bronze technology in the late third millennium bce had effectively altered the earlier reliance upon stone and copper.
During the Middle Kingdom (c.
2008 bce–1775 bce), massive fortress building took place at the Second Cataract in the south in Nubia.
Furthermore, permanent military duty was established and some type of cursus honorum for high-ranking soldiers is discernible.
Egyptian history is separated into unified periods, called Kingdoms, from those in between when disunity was prevalent and warfare frequent.
The latter eras are called Intermediate Periods.
This bibliography commences with Dynasties I and II, often called the Early State, and then follows on to the fully developed archaic state of the Old Kingdom, covering Dynasties III–VIII.
Subsequent is the First Intermediate Period, which ended with the second unification of the Middle Kingdom (Dynasties XII–XIII).
The Second Intermediate Period comes afterward, to be succeeded in turn by the New Kingdom (Dynasties XVIII–XX).
That was the era of Egypt’s great empire in Asia (Palestine especially, but also southern Syria) and Nubia in the south up to the Fourth Cataract.
A third period of disunity then occurred (Dynasties XXI–XXV).
The Saite Period of Dynasty XXVI (664 bce–525 bce) is often recognized as the final epoch of a strong independent Egypt.
But due to outside invasions, the Egyptians of the Delta came to rely upon northern Ionian mercenaries.
This is particularly evident during the reign of the first Saite ruler, Psammetichus I (664 bce–610 bce), but became stable thereafter.
Then came the domination of Persia, which, despite some independent royal houses, effectively concludes the history owing to Alexander the Great’s invasion of Egypt in 332 bce.

Related Results

Tracing the Genesis of Hybrid Warfare
Tracing the Genesis of Hybrid Warfare
The literature on hybrid warfare is relatively new as the term was only coined in 2006 and the subject remains open for new findings and research. The combination of tactics used i...
Review Essays
Review Essays
Book reviewed in this article:HOMOSEXUALITY, QUEER THEORY, AND CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY: THE LESBIAN AND GAY STUDIES READER Edited by Henry Abe love, Michèle Aina Barale, and David M. Ha...
Egyptian Mathematics Disclosure
Egyptian Mathematics Disclosure
Some fundamental mathematical researches have been carried out about mathematical certainties based on ancient Egyptian mathematical sources and their problems following ancient Eg...
Russian Hybrid Warfare: Not New, Well-Accomplished, and Limited in Scope
Russian Hybrid Warfare: Not New, Well-Accomplished, and Limited in Scope
Hybrid warfare is actually nothing new, despite the fact that observers were initially surprised at the coordinated and disciplined political-military approach that encompassed Rus...
10. Geography and Strategy
10. Geography and Strategy
This chapter examines how geographical setting shapes the conduct of war. It first provides an overview of the ways that physical geography influences the tactical identities of ar...
15. Geography and Strategy
15. Geography and Strategy
This chapter examines how geographical setting shapes the conduct of war. It first provides an overview of the ways that physical geography influences the tactical identities of ar...
Asymetric Warfare: Slogan or Reality?
Asymetric Warfare: Slogan or Reality?
In the United States, the title asymmetric warfare was popular in the years following the attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. While still used by some senior membe...
Nomadic Warfare before Firearms
Nomadic Warfare before Firearms
Nomadic warfare in the Eurasian steppes centered on a mobile horse-archer whose composite bow was surpassed by firearms only in the 17th and 18th centuries. Until the rise of effec...

Back to Top