Javascript must be enabled to continue!
8. Opinion evidence
View through CrossRef
The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offers the best preparation for tackling exam questions. Each book includes typical questions, bullet-pointed answer plans and suggested answers, author commentary and diagrams and flow charts. This chapter explores an area of evidence law dominated by expert witness evidence and the extent to which flawed testimony leads to miscarriages of justice. Expert evidence is now commonplace in criminal and civil trials, and the courts and Parliament have developed procedures to ensure that it is of high quality. These are an eclectic mix of common law and statute and their development reflects the importance of scientific expertise. It is necessary to be familiar with the differences between expert and non-expert opinion evidence and on when and in what circumstances both types are admissible and questions that can be asked of the expert whilst giving evidence. The approach depends on whether the question relates to civil or criminal trials.
Title: 8. Opinion evidence
Description:
The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offers the best preparation for tackling exam questions.
Each book includes typical questions, bullet-pointed answer plans and suggested answers, author commentary and diagrams and flow charts.
This chapter explores an area of evidence law dominated by expert witness evidence and the extent to which flawed testimony leads to miscarriages of justice.
Expert evidence is now commonplace in criminal and civil trials, and the courts and Parliament have developed procedures to ensure that it is of high quality.
These are an eclectic mix of common law and statute and their development reflects the importance of scientific expertise.
It is necessary to be familiar with the differences between expert and non-expert opinion evidence and on when and in what circumstances both types are admissible and questions that can be asked of the expert whilst giving evidence.
The approach depends on whether the question relates to civil or criminal trials.
Related Results
Navigating Public Opinio
Navigating Public Opinio
Abstract
Do politicians listen to the public? How often and when? Or are the views of the public manipulated or used strategically by political and economic elite...
Following Leaders
Following Leaders
The question of leadership is connected to many central debates in democratic theory. In this chapter, the focus is on leadership in terms of beliefs, not desires. Opinion leaders’...
17. Corroboration, the ‘Turnbull Guidelines’ and Opinion Evidence
17. Corroboration, the ‘Turnbull Guidelines’ and Opinion Evidence
This chapter considers the nature of corroborative evidence; the situations where corroborative evidence is required as a matter of law; the situations where a corroboration warnin...
17. Corroboration, the ‘Turnbull Guidelines’ and Opinion Evidence
17. Corroboration, the ‘Turnbull Guidelines’ and Opinion Evidence
This chapter considers the nature of corroborative evidence; the situations where corroborative evidence is required as a matter of law; the situations where a corroboration warnin...
Evidence-Based Practice in Exercise Science
Evidence-Based Practice in Exercise Science
Evidence-Based Practice in Exercise Science: The Six-Step Approach equips readers with the basic skills and competencies for discerning the value of scientific research. Using a me...
Evidence-Based Public Health
Evidence-Based Public Health
Abstract
Ideally, public health practitioners always incorporate scientific evidence in making management decisions, developing policies, and implementing programs. ...
Roberts & Zuckerman's Criminal Evidence
Roberts & Zuckerman's Criminal Evidence
Abstract
Roberts & Zuckerman's Criminal Evidence gives an authoritative commentary on the fundamental principles and underlying logic of criminal evidence laws. ...

